An effort to help some members get out of the worst gambing fallacy

[Skakus]

Sorry, but I also use a picture of my real self.




Hey, did any of you see flat's post on VLS a couple of days ago accusing Bayes & superman of being online rng casino agents?

Well now the shoe's on the other foot and he's jumping up and down like a baby! Ha! It's laughable.

[monaco]

hey Skakus, I'm not one to judge, but your photographer maybe didn't catch your best side 

[speed]

Hey, did any of you see flat's post on VLS a couple of days ago accusing Bayes & superman of being online rng casino agents?

Skakus can u post  link?


Flatino once asked me for some illegal way to win roulette, i knew that I could not trust him and i refused.
(somebody who can win with  legal way he dont need ilegal way)

I belive it's possible that he actually has his own casino or is somehow connected to casino.

I see that there are some newcomers who believe him i advises them to believe only evidence, not words.

[Skakus]

hey Skakus, I'm not one to judge, but your photographer maybe didn't catch your best side 

hey monaco, sorry mate, I had the wrong picture uploaded. All fixed now!

[monaco]

The old Skakus seemed less scary..

[Drazen]

@ skakus and speed

Yeah we know both of you like to kindle the fire. Your statements are just childish.

Man is 73,  give him a break...

Regards

Drazen

[TwoCatSam]

I know you find it hard to believe, but this really is my cat!

[Skakus]

@ skakus and speed

Yeah we know both of you like to kindle the fire. Your statements are just childish.

Man is 73,  give him a break...

Regards

Drazen

What is childish about pointing out that someone is complaining about being treated exactly the same way they have treated others?

[albertojonas]

Some events are DUE to happen. Black after a streak of Reds is more certain than death.



Ibboba is a gambler for long time. He does not need to prove anything.

[F_LAT_INO]

Sorry, but I also use a picture of my real self.




Hey, did any of you see flat's post on VLS a couple of days ago accusing Bayes & superman of being online rng casino agents?

Well now the shoe's on the other foot and he's jumping up and down like a baby! Ha! It's laughable.

--I think you have lost your tyres somewhere on the road and woke up.
--When somebody forces RNG numbers instead of real roulette numbers
  repeatedly saying how they are easier to beat then real numbers,that
  those are random while real not.....What should one suppose to think
  about that.....thats my thoughs about the matter based on constant
  observance....couple years same story.....and I bet JL and Skakus will
  beat RNG numbers to prove theirs point....If it wasn't sad it would be
  ridiculous.
   

[F_LAT_INO]

Skakus can you post  link?


F_LAT_INO once asked me for some illegal way to win roulette, i knew that I could not trust him and i refused.
(somebody who can win with  legal way he don't need ilegal way)

I belive it's possible that he actually has his own casino or is somehow connected to casino.

I see that there are some newcomers who believe him i advises them to believe only evidence, not words.
[/quot


---You talking science fiction....

[Skakus]

--I think you have lost your tyres somewhere on the road and woke up.
--When somebody forces RNG numbers instead of real roulette numbers
repeatedly saying how they are easier to beat then real numbers,that
those are random while real not.....What should one suppose to think
about that.....that's my thoughs about the matter based on constant
observance....couple years same story.....and I bet JL and Skakus will
beat RNG numbers to prove theirs point....If it wasn't sad it would be
ridiculous.
   

You know, even though I test and play around with rng, like you I only ever put real money down on real wheels. That could change one day though because there is little or no difference in the results.

[superman]

That could change one day though because there is little or no difference in the results

[Skakus]

 
---You talking science fiction....


Ok, mcmonaco. 

[woods101]

Some events are DUE to happen. Black after a streak of Reds is more certain than death.
 

Getting back on topic - I'll second that. I thought that was THE gamblers fallacy - that something is due based on past results. I have to say that the truth as I see it is the original 'fallacy' is not fallacy at all. Based on law of large numbers the gamblers belief that something is due is entirely correct. the problem is not knowing when it is due.
As far as testing for thousands of spins etc. Should this be a 'sub-fallacy' or fallacy no 23b or something like that? I'm sure there's prob quite a few more (debatedly) miss-held beliefs....?

Woods