Simple system II

[ignatus]

Outside betting. L-L-H repeat L-L-H. always repeat this pattern. I don't know why it works so well? Even-Even-Odd repeat Even-Even-Odd all the time! or finally Red-Red-Black repeat Red-Red-Black. Works well for me...

I use martingale progression.

Cheers!

[Drazen]

Definitely top 1 for me ! (of best systems of course)

Cheers

Drazen

[ander]

So basically the martingale system has worked for you so far. If L-L-H comes out you play that same sequence?

[Maui13]

Hi Ignatus,


So you would play...


L-L-H...L-L-H - just 1,2,4 ....1,2,4 or do you play 1,2,4...8,16,32


then switch over to E-E-O? Or is there a specific pattern you run?


Cheers
M

[TwoCatSam]

So basically the martingale system has worked for you so far. If L-L-H comes out you play that same sequence?

I understood you just playe LLH all the time.  One right after another.

So which is it?  Do you play LLH constantly, or wait for an LLH and bet for a repeat LLH?

Sam

[ignatus]

Yes, I repeat this pattern all the time, and use martingale, all the time. Simple!

Cheers!

[Paul2012]

And do you have a limit to stop at, or do you keep betting 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,and so on !!!

[TwoCatSam]

So......on BVNZ

You bet L and you have a 50% chance of winning.  You don't.
You bet L again and you have a 25% chance of winning.  You don't.
You bet H and you have a 12.5% chance of winning.
(I'm no math person, but I strongly believe if you predict three ECs in advance, this math is correct.  Would not matter what three: H E R would be the same.)

So, considering all three bets, you have an 87.5% chance of winning.

Is that the way you see it?

Sam

[HP]

Surprising simple system and good results while testing. But no stop loss? Because we all know that Martingale is a killer.  My max = 32 units loss so far, but maybe I am just lucky...?

[Kav]

I think I may have an idea why this works.
Because although simple, it is also chaotic: you do have a favorite bet (L) yet you also bet quite often on the opposite bet, forming a long series of bets that are as crazy as the roulette outcomes...

It's one of the best systems I've read.
And I admit I'm tempted to mess up its simplicity and try a variable bet (not necesarily a progression).

[Drazen]

I am sorry i put so much irony in my first post here that someone maybe got blind with it 

Martingale? Oh dear please...


Cheers

[GLC]

I have a little different take on a martingale progression.

If you cap it, it's not a "martingale" and none of the fears and phobias surrounding a martingale apply.  It's a "capped martingale" and all fears and phobias surrounding a capped martingale do apply.    

Think of it this way.  A 5 step capped martingale if lost costs you 31 units.  So really you're flat betting a cycle at 31 units.  Not 31 units each spin, but 31 units each cycle.

Remember my theory that every progression is a flat bet cycle.  Some are just more complicated than others.

[foogus]

I did a spreadsheet based on this system flat betting with actual spins.  Results attached.

[ignatus]

This is very old. Perhaps it should be removed

[GLC]

This is very old. Perhaps it should be removed

I have some systems that are 2 years old and are still on the forum.  Many are embarrassing for me to read 2 years after the fact.

Old doesn't mean worthless.

For my 2 cents worth, we definitely need a stop-loss, because this will have a long losing streak periodically.  No mechanical, repeat pattern can win in the long run with a flatbet.  And a marty alone doesn't make it a winner no matter how many steps the marty is.

Players have tested every concievable pattern for thousands of  spins and they have all tanked.

when I was new to roulette, I tested a 7 step marty betting RRBBRRBBRRBBRRBB continuously for 5,000 historic spins.  I won 1 unit for every 15 bets in the test.  I used 7 steps because it's 1-2-4-8-16-32-64 and all I could bet was 1 - 100 quarters.

I invested $100 or 400 units.  That's just over 3 losses of the 7 step marty.  The very first day, within 2 hours I had 2 losses.  Subtracting the wins in between the losses, I ended up down 207 units.  I threw in the towel.  Test over.

That was a very good lesson for me to learn early in my studies.

I hope someone can learn from my mistake.

GLC