Ninesector

[ignatus]

A new system. More confident this will work better. Several Reason why. From my other failed system "half moon strategy" result showed that repeats in the same sector (or half-sector) of the wheel happened many times. 10+ times even. So, this system take advantage of this.

For each number I calculated the bet: same number as last spin + 4 numbers on each side of that bet (on the wheel.) That is 9 numbers. This will get most repeats.

That WILL happen a lot of times.

Law of three, some may argue true or not, but if it's true that repeats in the same sector of the wheel will happen for once every 3 spins, (or more) this system will work pretty well.

System was ment for flatbetting 9 numbers. How effective it is time will tell, and if any progression is needed etc.

I made a simple software that calculate each bet as I described.

link:s://hotfile.com/dl/178690410/dab34d2/ninesector.exe.html

Feel free to use it.

Any comments or results of this system are welcome

Cheers   

[ignatus]

Well, tested this at a live-casino (not real play) and the results was not so good as I expected? (as usual!) LoL  Anyway it was not a complete fail, but then I wonder if the result would differ if betting random 9 numbers or any other way?... flatbetting would definitly not work. (at least from these results?) A progression is needed  9 numbers with a progression of 111 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 11 16 22 (add to this list a bad streak of 8 numbers in the beginning and the end.)

(+8 losses in the beginning)
32 win
3   win
26 win
4
35
32 win
22
24
33 win
3
19
32 win
1
11
27 win
13 win
4
6
3
7  win
14
21
5
4
34
26
19 win
0   win
22
12
12 win
26 win
23
13
2
20
24 win
(+8 losses)
3 win

[Ralph]

You can not assume the ball will land on a sector on its average chance. It is like to say, as red will come up 50% of the time on a nozero wheel that means it is every second time.

Somebody post here before a 100% winning system using 2 dozen, assuming the 2/3 bet must hit on an even rate  two hits of three.  You can expect to wait for a 9 sector up to 90 spins.

A progression will probably make you staying longer time in the play, but not sure you will win more at the end, a bust will cost.

[ignatus]

You can expect to wait for a 9 sector up to 90 spins.

A progression will probably make you staying longer time in the play, but not sure you will win more at the end, a bust will cost.

I don't think that's true,..."wait for a 9 sector for up to 90 spins"?? Results was not so good as I expected but not so bad either?  A progression would sure give better results. Chances of losing the 13 step progression COULD happen, but chances for that is not so big... System needs more testing. Will post more results later on.

Cheers

[Ralph]

Some thing which is rare will come soon or later. I have seen 90 times without nine numbers. I have seen 868 spins of sleeping number, 24 reds or black I see every month. 128 times a sleeping line.

It need some luck to not meet this outcomes using aggressive progressions, it is risky, but you can win as well, do not believe it is sure.

A large bankroll will help, but it is often buying time, you can stand longer, with a risk of losing more.
That's said, nothing says yo will lose, you can win as well.

I hope you understand what progressions do.

[Turner]

I don't think that's true......

Cheers

Unfortunatly ignatus its not about what you think is true...its about hard facts. Go in General area, about 3 pages back, i did a post called Stats. I suggest u read it. 9 Sectors isnt there but a line is and a dozen is so do the maths....its inbetween.
Turner

[ignatus]

Yes, you're right. A 13 step progression would be no good idea. New result show that loss happened 3 times in this session. It happens. But thanks to Skakus gave a very nice progression for 9 numbers that could be very useful

Playing 9 numbers you have 4 bets to break even. Play 1 unit on 9 numbers and give it up to 4 tries.

If you lose all 4 then start again with 1 unit.

If you win within 3 bets then start again with 2 units.

If you keep winning within 3 tries then continue starting each round with 2 units.

As soon as you lose a round of 4 bets drop back to 1 unit for the next round.

If you win on the fourth bet (break even) stay on the current unit level for the next round.

If you win on the fourth bet (break even) twice in a row then move to the other unit level for the next round.

I'm quite satisfied with these result...

[ignatus]

Played now again (live casino) 90 spins ended up with +250 units. Was flatbetting in the beginning, then using Skakus progression for 9 numbers....

Tried to save the graph from roulette Xtreme, (it was a weak positive trend.)

Result in text-format

[Proofreaders2000]

Nice system Ignatus. 

Consider only one neighbor on each side insted of four, flat-betting.

[TwoCatSam]

ignatus

Apply the JL logic here.  Your nine will go to sleep as Ralph said.  It's a matter of when.  Jl says it beastly hard to land in exactly the spot where the nine starts losing.  (roughly) 

I seem to have no trouble landing my parachute just where ol' Bossy took a dump.  Knowwhutimean?

As Ralph says, only luck will keep you out of this pile.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Nice system Ignatus. 

Consider only one neighbor on each side insted of four, flat-betting.

..........and we're back to Gamlet!

Sam

[Proofreaders2000]

TwoCat take your meds. 

[TwoCatSam]

Proof

Seriously, that was one of Gamlet's sectors way way way back when I spoke with him through translator.  I still have his writings.

I do take my meds daily, but the Gamlet idea was one of the strongest I've ever seen.  Kon-fu-sed wrote a tracker program for it, but he wrote it wrong.  I have that, too.  I tried to get him to write it according to Gamlet, but he left the forum.

If you remember Dairmaid, he did a similar test at Dublin.  Someone called hm a "crash test dummy" for using the size bets he did.  I think it was holyman.
Anyway, I said then that using fixed sectors was not the way to go; that we needed someone to write the Gamlet tracker and it would work better.

Gamlet's method was flat betting.  Much like the G.U.T, it bet many different size bets, from three to nine numbers.  All of the bets worked in harmony to further the cause.  The nine bets won more often; the three bets paid more.

I can't remember the number of times systems have morphed back to the original Gamlet! 

Samster
(poppin' those meds--washin' 'em down with rum and coke)

[ignatus]

Thanks.  Well, i can rewrite the program for a 3 bet sector, if that's your wish? Im thinking also of narrowing it down to a 7 sector? ....System works pretty well, and results show profits.

Cheers 

[TwoCatSam]

ignatus

You can write a Gamlet Tracker???

If you're serious, I'll dig out my notes and post the exact rules. 

Sam