unique ELMO method

[amk]

I was lucky to find this old ELMO method from 2009. It can challenge a dozen missing for 25-30 spins.


He did not create a thread for this method but was randomly posted within another thread.


I wanted to see what the opinions are and if anyone can figure out the progression.




UNIQUE ELMO METHOD
o.k. here we go!

Wait for the 7-12 or 25-30 to come out 4 times at least.
What must NOT come out is the 1-6 or 31-36.
If the 13-18 or 19-24 come out, just ignore them, so as an example.

11
13
19
7
14
20
25
13
30

o.k. there you have had 9 spins and the 7-12 and 25-30 have come out the required 4 times. The 1-6 and 31-36 have went missing which is excactly what we were looking for.

Now we will use an 8 step progression but in a unique way.

put 1 unit on the 1-3 street.
put 1 unit on the 4-6 street.
put 1 unit on the 13-18 double street.
put 1 unit on the 19-24 double street.
put 1 unit on the 31-33 street.
put 1 unit on the 34-36 street.

Now to make a profit, we are hoping the 1-3, 4-6, 31-33, or 34-36 street appears but if the 13-18 double street or 19-24 double street appear, we get returned our chips. So in effect we are either going to win 6 or draw even.

The only thing that can beat us is if the 7-12 double street or 25-30 double street appear, in which case we go to step 2 in the progression of a total of 8 steps.

This is a good way of playing because even if we don't hit our 1-3, 4-6, 31-33 or 34-36 street for a profit, we will many times just get our stake back and not have to move up 1 in the progression.
What this all means is that for us to lose completely, we are going to have to witness a dozen (which our 4 potential winning streets are) not coming out for something like over 20+ spins. Remember just for the qualifying in this instance, it took 9 spins and we saw no 1-3, 4-6, 31-33 or 34-36. And now we can play an 8 step progression where even if the 13-18 or 19-24 show up a lot, we are always going to be returned our chips and we do not have to move up 1 in the progression.

So it is possible you could go through 25-30 spins and still only be at level 3 or 4 in the progression when you hit your winner. It is fair to say that you will very seldom ever lose a game playing this way and you will build up some really nice profits.

[TwoCatSam]

amk

To my way of thinking, you would be waiting forever and a day for a bet.  This could have a longer wait time than Jl's "Pattern Breaker".  I assume when one of the "no-no's" appear, you start from scratch.

A bot working at BVNZ might have a chance, but I doubt it.

Sam

[amk]

Thanks for your reply and friendly insights TwoCat.


Could we perhaps just wait for a dozen to repeat 4 times? lets say 3 times : )


or maybe the dozen missing most in 10, 15 or 20 spins. I think this will actually be very strong.


We could use this sort of bet selection to our advantage. Only very rarely are bets mentioned which include a no win or loss selection..


Hopefully someone might even see other applications.




Looking forward to insights.

[amk]

Wow, just saw that mr.ore is on the thread.


Last post was in November 2011


Hello mr.ore, hope you might post some insights, would be great! 

[mr.ore]

Hello, just looking what happened after all that time  . Seems nothing new here, I was just curious...

Regarding the method, a dozen CAN realistically be missing for 60 spins. I mean, if you simulate for long enough, it will happen...

[amk]

Hello mr ore 

Wow, a dozen missing 60 spins. Have you seen this?


Just focusing on the method, what do you think the progression might be?

Might be interesting to test.

I hope someone might see the usefulness of this method as I do.


The method should not be overlooked in my opinion.