2:1 buffered by EC

[GLC]

Here's a fun little system that has some real potential for profits.

We are going to bet the dozens along with one of the High/Low EC.

For our 2 dozen bets, we bet 1 unit on the 2 dozens that didn't hit last.

Along with these 2 dozens, we bet the H/L that is opposite the 2 dozens if the 2 dozens are either 1 & 2 or 2 & 3. 

If we are betting 1 unit on each of the dozens 1&2 we bet 3 units on the High EC.

If we are betting 1 unit on each of the dozens 2&3 we bet 3 units on the Low EC.

If we hit a dozen that is not covered by the H/L bet, we will lose 2 units.
If we hit a dozen that is covered by the H/L bet, we will win 4 units.
If we hit the H/L bet but no dozen, we will win 1 unit.
If we are betting the 1&3 dozens and a H/L that means that there are 6 numbers plus the zeros that will cause us to lose all five units.

If we are betting 1 unit on each of the dozens 1&3 we bet 3 units on the High or Low that is opposite of the last spin.  Ie. if the last spin was 15, we would bet 3 units on High EC.

If we are -10 units or more, double all three bets.  IE.  2 units on each of the dozens and 6 units on the H/L.

If we are -30 or more, double all three bets again.  IE.  4 units on each of the dozens and 12 units on the H/L.

We can set a win target and a stop loss target just in case things get out of control.

This a good system that is fun to play, easy to play and has very good potential.  There is a losing sequence so remember to set realistic stop loss.  I haven't tested enough to determine how profitable this can be, but I am having excellent results.

George,

P.S.  We could pick dozens by another means, ie. bet the last  2 to hit.  Bet the furthest 2 to hit, or use any of the other double dozen selection methods published on this forum.

[Twisteruk]

Looks like a Funn one George, Thanx for sharing 

[GLC]

Looks like a Funn one George, thanks for sharing 

Thanks Twisteruk,

Unfortunately, unless we find a way to tweak this, it's not much fun losing.  I had a couple of good test sessions winning 30 units  and 34 units.

Then I've lost the next 3 sessions. At minus 50 each.  I don't know if they were just sessions from hell, or if they're the norm and my first 2 are the exception.

As for me, there's too much else to test to waste a lot more time with this.  It was just an idea had while musing on Compa's last thread.

G

[Hermes]

It looks like hedging in Forex.
Hermes

[Twisteruk]

Thanks Twisteruk,

Unfortunately, unless we find a way to tweak this, it's not much fun losing.  I had a couple of good test sessions winning 30 units  and 34 units.

Then I've lost the next 3 sessions. At minus 50 each.  I don't know if they were just sessions from hell, or if they're the norm and my first 2 are the exception.

As for me, there's too much else to test to waste a lot more time with this.  It was just an idea had while musing on Compa's last thread.

G

Yes I agree. I gave it a small test drive, and the results were poor