Alien Harmonica

[ignatus]

1. Wait for a number hit in the middle column.


2. place bet in a "triangle" around this bet. For an example number 5 hit, bets would be placed at 1,7,6 or 3,9,4.


3. Do 11 spins with 1u bet betting these 3 numbers.


4. Now, look at latest number hit in the middle column. Place three numbers in a horizontal line covering that number. For an example number 26 was the latest in the middle column, bets would then be placed at 26,29,32 or 23,26,29 etc..


5. Do 3 spins with 2u bet on these 6 numbers.


6. Still no hit? find a place somewhere between/away from the 6 numbers already placed, bet 3 numbers in a vertical line, covering one number in spin history. For an example number 18 was hit; Bets are placed 18,20,22.


7. Do spins beginning with 3u bet, betting these 9 nummbers, until hit.


Progression would look like this:



3 Numbers               6 No. 9 Numbers
|                                |       |
v                               v       V
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 9 12 16 22 30 40 55

[Turner]

Ive seen worse...but...i love the name

[ignatus]

I've seen worse...but...i love the name

(y)

[iggiv]

randomize it. it can be any number on any column, and any "figure" around it. and not necessary the last number. One of a few last numbers it can be. the idea is not so bad.
remember, roulette hates the same stiff patterns. If u use only middle column, u won't cover any other part of the table. Roulette will hit you right there after a while. Because it always finds your "weak" spots and hits there. That's how it is. If u use the same patterns roulette always start working against you after a while.

[iggiv]

and don't expect this method to hold for 1000 spins in a row...

[ignatus]

randomize it. it can be any number on any column, and any "figure" around it. and not necessary the last number. One of a few last numbers it can be. the idea is not so bad.
remember, roulette hates the same stiff patterns. If u use only middle column, u won't cover any other part of the table. Roulette will hit you right there after a while. Because it always finds your "weak" spots and hits there. That's how it is. If u use the same patterns roulette always start working against you after a while.

Yes, I tried to "randomize it" by betting in different patterns. first the triangle with 3 bets, then a horizontal line in the middle column, and last a vertical line.... yes, perhaps the bets can be placed not covering the last numbers in spin history... true, what that best option would be im not sure.


But this is a random progressive bet. (With good hitrate) from my short testings.... I don't know, I don't have RX so I can't make any graphs.... I'll see about that later if I can afford RX. (I didn't find any torrent or cracked versions)..anyway

[Chrisbis]

Take the free trial first............


link:://:.uxsoftware.com/pages/download.html

...and its only £25.67 to purchase now

[ignatus]

Take the free trial first............


link:://:.uxsoftware.com/pages/download.html

...and its only £25.67 to purchase now

My trial has expired. Anyway, I will buy it,when I have money. Perhaps.... Thing is, I can make a graph doin 300 spins etc, but is that really proving something ? ....

[Chrisbis]

Well...........it may prove if the bet selection is cyclic in its production of Wins/Losses.


In other words, when You know a bets cyclic nature, then You can defend the losses(drawdown) by designing a suitable negative (or sometimes positive on the winning streaks) progression.


If You know a bet lasts 50 spins before it nosedives down say 200 units, then You can either avoid that by changing unit base value, or play a different strategy whilst that formulation of results is taking place.


Graph(s) will also show U the average drawdown at the beginning of a given bet,
so You know what your max BR has to be.

I have just found this graph from our forum friend Turner, which he posted over in Betselection.cc


I'm sure he will not mind me using it as an example.! 


Anyway, have a look, and can you see how the small drawdowns that I have circled in lime green are almost Identical?


And the flat nature of the upward increase in BR, shows what U will expect from this bet.
(I don't know what the bet was, I only wanted to find U a typical graph, for illustration purposes.)