Dominating 6.

[ignatus]

Well...er..no 

Can you please try to explain ? because I don't get it, how you could end up with -180 ? Perhaps you flatbetted those series of 5 (or 6), but I ask again, How many of those series of losses did you have ?

I really don't think this is fair and i demand an explanation. Seriously I've spent many HOURS of testing this system live, now you posting this saying you lost -180 without giving any further explanation, you playing it WRONG that is for sure. This is not a flatbetting system. wtf??

[Turner]

Very dangerous talk...

No its not....it how I interpreted the phrase in context. We use it all the time.


OMG
For God sake shut up
In the name of God will you stop interrupting


Lighten up.....for God sake

[ignatus]

Lighten up.....for God sake

Turner, please no I won't. I said i spent many HOURS testing this system. NOW, you, Ralph AND proof is trying to ruin this system



Now you're doing it AGAIN.


This is NOT OK.

[ddarko]

don't lighten up then.......

Oh, too late.....

& BTW post in the notepad like you were asked to do, potty mouth.....

[ignatus]

& by the way post in the notepad like you were asked to do, potty mouth.....

¨


No, why should I ? Only because you think bulling is right? Only because you think it's right to ruin EVERY system I post, including this one , which is a *working* system.


Please, do me a favor. Stop all this "intelligent" comments,....Proofreaders2000, won't answer my questions, and just post he "lost -180" without giving any further explanation.... even though he ADMIT he played it totaly wrong. Flatbetting. This is just to put me down, ? Why else would he do it? ONE HOUR now for he's reply, I even sent him a private message.

[Proofreaders2000]

Can you please try to explain ? because I don't get it, how you could end up with -180 ? Perhaps you flatbetted those series of 5 (or 6), but I ask again, How many of those series of losses did you have ?--Ignatus

I only tested it twice.  Why can't the
progression be optional for those who prefer flat-betting?

Remember it is up to the bettor whether he/she wants
to take a larger risk with a progression (and I chose not to).

[RFMAXX]

i dont understand why there is so much hate.

i like reading ignatus systems. if he weren't here, there were boring times. no new topics for days in the forum.
his systems aren't the holy grail but at least he is "inventing and trying" and sometimes worth reading. i always tweak his systems
to test them my way. its fun...and thats what it should be!

so ignatus..."switch the syle up and if they hate then let them hate and watch the money pile up".
keep posting...i will find your postings in the notepad too   

[ddarko]

¨
No, why should I ? Only because you think bulling is right? Only because you think it's right to ruin EVERY system I post, including this one , which is a *working* system.

Because you were TOLD by a mod to do that. The other 99.9% of the forum abide by the forum rules, but no not you, you can just do whatever you wish. You were told by a mod to cut out the bad language, but again no not you, F this & F that come out from your fingers as often as a Chubby Brown DVD.

You have stated you "respect" Turner & Proof.......

Turner posts something you don't like & BOOM off you go on another rant......

Proof posts that your latest H.G. was -180 & BOOM off you go again, ranting he didn't reply quickly enough to your demands.

What happened to when you banned here & said over at Vic's new place that you were ONLY going to post there ?

How about you only :-

1) post in the notepad
2) wash your mouth out with soap and water
3) Stop taking EVERYTHING so personally !!!!
4) Get your temper under control

because if you don't I'm sure Iggy will ban you for good, and your giving every reason to.

[ignatus]

Can you please try to explain ? because I don't get it, how you could end up with -180 ? Perhaps you flatbetted those series of 5 (or 6), but I ask again, How many of those series of losses did you have ?--Ignatus

I only tested it twice.  Why can't the
progression be optional for those who prefer flat-betting?

Remember it is up to the bettor whether he/she wants
to take a larger risk with a progression (and I chose not to).

OK fine. you can flatbet if you wish. I'm sorry for being upset proof OK. But I want you to answer this question i've asked three times now:


How many series of 5 (or 6?) losses in a row DID you have ?


If you answer this question, we can talk further, BECAUSE, if you had 2 series or even 3 series of losses, followed by 3 wins then that would mean you WOULD be recoverd and have a positive bankroll IF you would use the progression, as adviced.


Look;


bet

LLLLL LOSS (1u bet)
LLLLL LOSS (2u bet)
LLLLL LOSS (3u bet)
LLW  WIN (4u bet)
LW   WIN  (3u bet)
LLLW WIN (2u bet)
LW          (1u bet)

This is how the progression works.

[ignatus]

Because you were TOLD by a mod to do that. The other 99.9% of the forum abide by the forum rules, but no not you, you can just do whatever you wish. You were told by a mod to cut out the bad language, but again no not you, F this & F that come out from your fingers as often as a Chubby Brown DVD.

You have stated you "respect" Turner & Proof.......

Turner posts something you don't like & BOOM off you go on another rant......

Proof posts that your latest H.G. was -180 & BOOM off you go again, ranting he didn't reply quickly enough to your demands.

What happened to when you banned here & said over at Vic's new place that you were ONLY going to post there ?

How about you only :-

1) post in the notepad
2) wash your mouth out with soap and water
3) Stop taking EVERYTHING so personally !!!!
4) Get your temper under control

because if you don't I'm sure Iggy will ban you for good, and your giving every reason to.

Ok? I'm sorry for being upset,.... but that was not my fault, and I've tried to explain the reasons why.


1) It's NOT right with your bulling that you trying to do all the time against me, you always make funny remarks and try to put me down, and to ruin my system in one way or another.


2) I use notepad, yes, when there is something I haven't *tried* and *tested* enough to be sure if the system is solid or not.

[ddarko]

Ok? I'm sorry for being upset,.... but that was not my fault, and I've tried to explain the reasons why.

if you keep you temper out of this people will be more inclined to play nice


1) It's NOT right with your bulling that you trying to do all the time against me, you always make funny remarks and try to put me down, and to ruin my system in one way or another.

No no no, I'm not having that. IF I was bullying you I'd of got a warning from a mod. Pls post were I have tried to RUIN any of your systems. I have never tested one of your systems, you have a new one virtually every day. Why on earth would I test a system that the author doesn't have any confidence in after 48/72 hours ?


2) I use notepad, yes, when there is something I haven't *tried* and *tested* enough to be sure if the system is solid or not.

Your definition of "tried & tested" is I fear different to most here

Now unlike you I won't blow a gasket if you don't answer my question, you haven't in the past so I expect little......

[Proofreaders2000]

Ok? I'm sorry for being upset,.... but that was not my fault, and I've tried to explain the reasons why.


1) It's NOT right with your bulling that you trying to do all the time against me, you always make funny remarks and try to put me down, and to ruin my system in one way or another.


2) I use notepad, yes, when there is something I haven't *tried* and *tested* enough to be sure if the system is solid or not.

It is hard to have confidence in a system that fails on the second test. 
If it failed on the fourth or fifth test *perhaps* a small progression may be warranted.

[ignatus]

It is hard to have confidence in a system that fails on the second test. 
If it failed on the fourth or fifth test *perhaps* a small progression may be warranted.

Now, PLEASE proof, can you answer my question... God! This is the Fourth time i ask it:


How many series of losses did you have ? (In a row) at most ?

You say it "failed" eventhough you played it *wrong* if you can answer this question everything else will be clear. Because you can't claim it failed if you cannot answer this question.

[Turner]

Turner, please no I won't. I said i spent many HOURS testing this system. NOW, you, Ralph AND proof is trying to ruin this system



Now you're doing it AGAIN.


This is NOT OK.

Ignatus....it was@proofreader, and it was an example of how we use the word God in a phrase out of habit but arnt intentionally disrespecting God.... read again, but this time "reel your neck in"


I wasnt talking to you....

[ignatus]

Ignatus....it was@proofreader, and it was an example of how we use the word God in a phrase out of habit but arnt intentionally disrespecting God.... read again, but this time "reel your neck in"


I wasn't talking to you....

You are really wasting my time here with these nonsense comments, that is totally unrelated with the system. Please, can you just stop doing that???... for the last 4 hours im trying to defend myself from these nonsense-comments + proofreaders false claim "the system won't work" when he was FLATBETTING it....... God help me! (Talking about God). Try focus on the system here, NOT making these nonsense comments or false claims. .... :@