Speedy Gonzalez!

[Priyanka]

Here I bring you Speedy González ! Those who have read Quad cycle from Turner would be aware of Quads and how ingenious the idea is. Inspired by that and inspired by Flat_ino's LvF, Greatgrampa's triple shooter and the authors system in the book that GLC gave me, comes Speedy Gonzalez. It started as an attempt to speed up quad cycle and then evolved into a full blown system, that I am using regularly now.

Hey! As with any other system, it loses. But the important part is, it also wins. I play it with +50/-50 targets. But I advice you to plan your own targets based on what suits you. Here goes the method!

link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt_eM1kUYTY

Enjoy him dancing the streets of roulette while I work on the background for trackers, spin results, analysis presentations and if time permits a bot for BV. Ariba! Ariba!

[Tomla021]

very well done--thank you

[agesta]

Thank`s a lot for the video, great job!!
Agesta

[Sakura616]

I try to look the video, but it didn't work.

[Smoczoor]

Video is very nice but system...

[Priyanka]

Nice art! Would you like to explain more on why you felt that way, may be that will help us more!

[joiner29]

could u explain the system in more detail please
tom

[GLC]

I guess from now on verbal explanations are old fashioned!

[Sakura616]

The vidio is not available for me. I live in Germany and I think this could be the reason.
Can you/someone explain me the System?
Thank you

[biagle]

Video is very nice but system...

I agree. I dont write here much, but im playing for real few years. So i played many systems here and looking from the outside it is just 6 streets bet. No mater you will bet 123 + 10 11 12 or 1 5 7 and 2 8 12. It is the same shit just in other hand. So maybe you are now lucky, but test 100 or 1000 sessions and you will be very deep down. sorry for my english.

biagle (and beleave me i tryed this)

[Turner]

every system is the same really...we just try to make different pretty patterns to convince ourselves we are doing something different.
I am making tests on systems...here and my own and replace bet selection with random choice using random.org

I did this...for example...with Flatinos 4 line for/against system. i let random select the 4 lines.

It gave same results. I even picked 5 numbers random, with an upward graph over 200 spins.

Why not? bet selection doesnt predict anything. Its random.

If it was doable....then 150 people in 3 years here would of found one.

[Spin4Fun]

every system is the same really...we just try to make different pretty patterns to convince ourselves we are doing something different.
I am making tests on systems...here and my own and replace bet selection with random choice using random.org

I did this...for example...with Flatinos 4 line for/against system. i let random select the 4 lines.

It gave same results. I even picked 5 numbers random, with an upward graph over 200 spins.

Why not? bet selection doesn't predict anything. Its random.

If it was doable....then 150 people in 3 years here would of found one.

I do have a random EC strategy in my bot... but how i turn it.... it even worse as other strategies... so fighting random with random is not a good solution.... or it would mean... 1 of them is not SO random...

[Priyanka]

looking from the outside it is just 6 streets bet.

Biagle, Let me try explaining why it is different than a 6 streets bet.

Theoritically 18 straights = 9 splits = 6 streets = 4 quads = 3 lines = 1EC. Well theoretically.

In reality, they are different and behave differently. Let me explain why. This is a very important lesson I learnt from Sam and I want all of us to understand the significance of it. Or tell me that I am wrong so that I can correct myself.

Let’s assume 1u = 18$.You can place 18$ on red EC or 1$ on all 18 red numbers. It is essentially the same.  The difference starts to come in when you place those 1$ on a combination of red and black numbers. 

Let me take two sets of three spins  1,4,9 and 1, 36, 13. Let us talk in street language first. Both the sets consist of 3 unique streets. There were 9 streets which slept through this 3 spin cycle. Now lets talk quad language. First set has 1 quad and 2nd set has 3 quads. First set had 3 quads that were sleeping and the second set had only 1 quad that was sleeping. Let’s talk EC language now. If you consider H/L ECs, first set has only one EC whereas the second set has both the ECs.

That collection of outcomes to be rolled up into a single event is the fundamental difference between both the approaches. That makes your betselection different and the odds different. In one case you are dealing with a collection of 1/12 odds and in other case you are dealing with a collection of ¼ odds. Hope am able to convey my message here. One might argue that the collective odds are 50%, but the number of permutations of possible bet selections are entirely different when you chose 6 streets and 2 quads. If you chose 6 streets you have an enormous number of bet selections to chose from as you need to choose 6 from 12. But if you chose 2 quads there are only 12 bet selections to chose from. That gives you the fundamental difference between the betting positions.

but test 100 or 1000 sessions

I test every post I comment on. I do sample and hypothesis testing. I do test them against the 1Mn spins that Bayes has posted. Following is the bankroll graph of speedy Gonzalez on those 1Mn spin set from Bayes. The max unit size on the table was little over 300 units. Leaving it open for feedback to discuss what's happening there. Needless to say this was continuous betting with no defined session rules.

[Turner]

I am biased to this bet selection anyhow....lol

[Priyanka]

Just in case you are not able to read the graph, we ended up closer to 200000u in 1Mn spins. That's an ROI of ~20%.