Inside bets that can win 80% or more.

[Auskaki]

Hi Warrior,

Bet using the last spin number each time. The actual no. or its opposite cousin. E.g 10 was the last spin number you choose the 16 nos in box 10 or opposite cousin  box 26. Use a different set of 16 nos. each time. Unless there is a repeat no. to the last one.

Refer to the attached file please. Print and paste it on a cardboard that can easily fit your palm, pocket. Have fun and see the correct. 9 nos. per card would be nice. I have left out the 0 here on purpose as there is no direct opposite no. to it. Unless you want to use the 10 and 5 combo which gives us 33 16 24 5 10 23 8 30 34 17 25 6 9 22 7 29. Give it a go and tell us how you are travelling.

[Nickmsi]

Hello . . .

Welcome to the forum and thanks for posting you method.

Please find enclosed a Tracker.

Simply insert the number spun in Column A (Yellow Column)and the Tracker will show you what numbers to bet and how much on each one.  There is a built in progression if you care to use it.

If you care to test this with RNG spins, then simply copy Column ET (the RNG spins) to Column A and then just press Function Key F9 for each set of new spins.

For those of you with our ExcelBot, we have enclosed a Bot Version so your bot can test this for you.

Hope this helps with your testing.

Cheers . . .

Nick

[Auskaki]

Hi Nick,

Download both files already, but MSExcel unable to open. What should I do now?

I am not very keen on RNG games, sorry.

[Nickmsi]

The Tracker was coded in Excel 2007 so it should work on that version and newer ones.

What version of Excel do you have?

Thanks

Nick

[Auskaki]

Hi Nick,

Sorry mine is 2003 ver. in my desktop pc. Will use my Windows 7 notebook to open the files, shouldnt be a problem now. Thanks.

[Auskaki]

Guys,

Check this out. I use the attached file with reference to the master list. The results will astonish you. Like I said before test this out with your own or download files of past spin results and make your own conclussion. Only use 0 wheels and no RNG on this test exercise.

Attached file is 210409Table3Spins.

Total spins = 390
Win on Last spin no. = 190
Win on Opp of last spin no. = 84
No win on both = 116
70.25% win on 390 spins.

Total bet on 390 spins x 16 units = 6240 units .
Total cost using Masterlist (274 spins x 16units) = 4384 units.
Total loss (115 x 16) = 1840 units

Summary.
Bet on 16 nos. on each spin, you win 20 units i.e 35 to 1 payout.
Total win on 190 spins x 20 = 3800 units.
Total loss on 115 spins x 16 = 1840 units.
Net profit = 3800 - 1840 = 1960 units.

Each rapid pin average 25 sec per spin.
390 spin = 390 x 25 sec = 9750 sec.

Not bad to win 1960 units in 2.7 hrs play time.

G'day.

[Spin4Fun]

What casino do you use?
Tested with a group op DB spins.. all go down very quickly...

[roulettefan]

i test also
down so quick

[Auskaki]

I use the attached file download from the forum previously. No idea where the data is from. Sorry. But use your own data to check.

All my other datas as mentioned earlier,  are from Crown Melbourne, Resort World in Malaysia, Spore Cruise ship, Marina Bay Spore .

I have revise the masterlist into Winlist to combine the last spin # and its opposite #. Some nos do repeat, so there wont be 32 nos. Print it out and take it with you to your local casinos or online. Have fun guys and winnnnnnnn....

Gday.

[Auskaki]

Will be back soon guys.

[Buffster]

Ausaki

You mention last spin number or opposite to last spin number.

190 wins was with last spin number.

if you only play that then you only won 190 spins using 16 numbers.

if you played opposite you only won 84 spins using 16 numbers.

but if you combined both for a total of 274 wins ... you no longer made bets on 16 numbers. You made bets on more than that.

So mayby you might want to review your calculations.


Buffster

[Buffster]

Auskaki

Also, forgot to mention, in your summary you don't calculate the 84 spins on other side ...

Just sayin...


Buffster

[ausguy]

Auskaki - you mention rapid. Does that mean Rapid Roulette ? I play that dealer spun interactive screen game here in Sydney.

The spin cycles here are very close to 1 per minute = 60 spins per hour. To have a 25 second spin cycle would surely mean having only a 10 second +/- bet window ?
Hardley time to get 16 inside bets down ? What NON RNG game that you play has 25 second spin cycles ?

Rapid Roulette (RR) here has a 40 second bet window + 20 seconds for the dealer spin & win processing/reset.  I think that the RR bet play program is preset & gives the same bet cycles whatever Casino it is in ?

My calc. on 390 spins for RR is 390 x 1min = 390min = 6 1/2 hours.

Even airball/slingshot games & RNG games have about a 40 second spin cycle.  To compare we calc. 390 x 40 = 15,600 divide by 3600 (60 x 60 for hours) = 4h 20min.

I don't follow some of the figures in your calculations either. Like "no win on both 116" ? adding both = 190 +84 = 274.  390 - 274 = 116 = total losses ?

Total losses "115 x 16 = 1,840" vs 116 x 16 = 1,856 ?

For things to work for real play everything must "ADD UP". On what's been so far presented it falls rather short ?


Buffster -  Auskaki calcs. the combined spins there = 190 + 84 = 274. Yes he misses the 84 in his summary & therefore short changes himself by 84 x 20 = 1,680 units.

I calc. it as total wins 274 x 20 = 5,480 - 1,856 (total losses @116 x 16 =1,856)    =  NET PROFIT 3,624.

 

[Buffster]

Ausguy

To win 274 spins he has to play both sides at the same time which equals playing more than 16 numbers.

So the calculations change enormously.

You will not be making 20 units per win ... much less.

I can tell that he will probably play between 24 and 30 numbers per spin.

Let's say 24 per spin (lowest) ... the profit just went down to 504.

At 25 even less...26 even less and so on.


Buffster

[ausguy]

Buffster - Just checked back to the start of the posts. My read on what Auskaki bets on is either 16 bets on the same side of the wheel, neighbours etc. or the same thing but centred on the number directly opposite to the last spin. Whatever side he bets on he never bets both sides simultaneously, always only 16 numbers.

I don't know how/when/why he decides to bet on the same side or opposite ? It may be in his detail there somewhere as I just quickly scanned the posts so it's easy to not pick up things doing that.

His stated 274 winning spins equaled 190 spins from the same side & 84 wins from the opposite side. The 190/84 results to me indicates a large mismatch of outcomes ?  What he doesn't reveal is what the loss share of the 116 spins was for the same side & the opposite sides ?

My experience is that within 390 spins the number distibution around the wheel would be reasonably even. So in sync. with that you would expect the same & opposite results would be 50/50 give or take a few % ? The 190/84 win % calcs. to around 69% & 31% repectively.

Independent tests would reveal the true story. Iggivs play graph explores a lot of negative territory.