Count 5

[ignatus]

Well now...this is an EC-method. I can say it works, how well it will work time will tell. What I wish to say to the forum moderators here (iggiv) I don't want to be discriminated in this forum. Not allowing me to post in the main forum is a ridicolous threat. I've listened to the critics and i've done more testing before I post anything, from now on...

This is not a new method.

Trigger: wait for one EC not hit for 5 spins. Bet that EC, with progression.

For those who do not believe in progressions, what can i say? For this method a progression is necessary. And let's calculate with the worst kind of scenario: -12 EC repeats. This would be a seven step progression: 1-2-4-8-16-32-64-(128 This would cover 13 EC repeats).

and how often do 12 EC repeats happen? you tell me...

[ignatus]

second run (livespins);

[buffalowizard]

I expect -12 ECs occurs roughly every 128 spins, therefore wiping out profits

BW

[ignatus]

Really? as you can see in the charts i did 700 spins, and that didn't happen once

[ignatus]

third run

[buffalowizard]

Come on,

Surely you know the drill by now -

Make a system

Show some upward graphs

Realise it loses

Apologise for the wasted effort

Repeat

[iggiv]

Ignatus, if u don't understand my English language i am telling you again. As long as you post as anybody else without flooding this forum and disturbing others with filling up main boards only by yourself -- i don't mind. If u start filling it up with your threads only so after a while only your threads can be seen here one after another (and other threads are lost in the past eventually because of yours)  -- you will be banned for each thread for one day. For the beginning. And if you keep arguing with Mod -- it's gonna be worse.

I thought you understood. so i don't mind against this thread now -- it's OK with others. But don't forget that your are not better and not worse than the others -- then everything is gonna be OK. But you forget about it sometimes and think that main board is FOR YOU ONLY.
and that's a mistake. And i will try to help making this forum readable and normal for everyone.

[iggiv]

Ignatus, and that's a last time i told u that.

Next time you start flooding the main board with one thread after another -- you gonna get banned for a while. you are stubborn and don't like to listen to anyone but yourself. How many times did i have to explain those simple things? I warned you, next time don't  say i didn't.

[ignatus]

I come with facts. and still you want to argue and put me down? The results are obvious... that you have some personal agenda against me is not my problem, it's yours.

[Skakus]

Are you kidding?

Wait for an EC not to hit for 5 spins then bet a martingale progression for 8 steps?

After all your messing around with this game that's what you bring to the table?


People, this guy is a wind up for sure.

Norman Bates the second...

[ignatus]

no, im not kidding, and what is your problem Skakus?  i have done over 1300 spins....and i haven't busted yet as you can see...

[buffalowizard]

Isn't this everyone's first system?

At least he's waiting for 5 losses I suppose lol

[Spin4Fun]

I dont think Ignatus is the only one putting system on the forum that will sink...

But any way...i tested it with +8000 live DB spins ... i have seen worser systems...

[Turner]

Ignatus...I wont be rude.
This is basic learning. Of course its winning now. How long do think the martingale has been going?...so why are there so many other progressions?. Thats because martingale is an explosion....and not a slow one.
Why is there a theory called RTM? Whats it built up to and regressing back down to?
Ill tell you.
Its yoir disaster waiting to happen. If 12 ec dont show in a row...why are there RGM ideas?
Buffs stat is right and wrong.
Probability is Buffs stat not variance
Variance is 12 1 12 3 10.
It happens. Ive seen it.
You dont see 12 in a row every few hundred spins
You see 12 in a row averaging every few hundred spins  within millions of spins
You have to know stray cats can scratch you, first, before you know not to stroke stray cats

[ignatus]

Thank you Buffalowizard for testing.

yes, ofcourse it's a risk playing with martingale. i've tried +1/-1 progression also with random numbers, but random cannot be trusted, i believe playing live is best.