Great tip to generate random roulette numbers...

[RouletteKnight]

I guess some of you already know, but maybe some don't.
For those of you who don't have RX,

Go to this website:
link:://:.random.org/integers/

First blank indicate the number of numbers you want to generate.
Second and third blank put a value of 0 and 36
Third blank format in 1 column.

You will have a list of "roulette" numbers appearing. Copy the numbers and paste in excel spreadsheet,
and "voila", you have all the numbers at your disposal. The numbers are also as random as they get as
they use disturbances from atmospheric noises. The only thing is you have to do is to manually calculate your wins
and loses...

There you go...

[foogus]

There is a limit on the number of numbers you can generate each day, but it resets so the next day you can do more.  I think the limit is about 70,000 per day.

[Azim]

There is a limit on the number of numbers you can generate each day, but it resets so the next day you can do more.  I think the limit is about 70,000 per day.

For those that want to use this system/method dynamically.

Here is another way to beat the online Randomness.

Download about 10,000 number's from random org, prior to playing. Populate your spreadsheet.
This way there is less chance of being tracked, not that I am saying online casino's are rigged.  But that will resolve a lot of issues in your mind.  You can't be that unlucky by waiting 7 spin matches and playing 5.  YOU REALLY REALLY HAVE TO BE UNLUCKY NOT TO HIT.

Forget playing with static data. Change your data prior to playing. IT WILL BE COMPLETE RANDOM.

I am not sure, if Crystal is up to it or not.  He can modify his program to allow a file to be loaded and create a dynamic look up file.

I would have done it but don't want to step on Crystals foot considering he has already started with it.

If Crystal says no. I can get something out by next Sunday.

That's what I tried to tell everyone. But no one was keen.  It would be a perfect dynamic system with number's changing every session anyone played.

[Steve]

disturbances from atmospheric noises

Do you mean these are "random", or "unpredictable" with any known approach?

Imagine if you were in the middle of the ocean on a boat, and wanted to predict how big next wave is likely to be.

The previous "events" have nothing to do with future events, right? Or not? Well most people will tell you previous roulette spins have no connection to future spins.

Or is it better to say the past few waves can offer clues as to how big the next wave might be?

Nodes, anodes, destructive and constructive waves. It is not at all difficult to use previous wave results to forecast a range of the most likely, and least likely, possibilities. For example, you may say after a specified time period, there is no expected wave at all, indicating both constructive and destructive wave, with zero overall effect (no up or down), then you can assume with a high degree of certainty that the next movement will be either up or down, and you have calculated a redued probability that the next wave will also have no up/down. It is not a certainty, but better odds than random, provided you had enough data from multiple reference points.

Beating roulette is no different. Model the relationship between variables, results, and other variables and results.

Many people have tried similar approaches to beat roulette. But they will look at "streaks", which is like looking at a 3d object with one eye.

[Azim]

Do you mean these are "random", or "unpredictable" with any known approach?

Imagine if you were in the middle of the ocean on a boat, and wanted to predict how big next wave is likely to be.

The previous "events" have nothing to do with future events, right? Or not? Well most people will tell you previous roulette spins have no connection to future spins.

Or is it better to say the past few waves can offer clues as to how big the next wave might be?

Nodes, anodes, destructive and constructive waves. It is not at all difficult to use previous wave results to forecast a range of the most likely, and least likely, possibilities. For example, you may say after a specified time period, there is no expected wave at all, indicating both constructive and destructive wave, with zero overall effect (no up or down), then you can assume with a high degree of certainty that the next movement will be either up or down, and you have calculated a redued probability that the next wave will also have no up/down. It is not a certainty, but better odds than random, provided you had enough data from multiple reference points.

Beating roulette is no different. Model the relationship between variables, results, and other variables and results.

Many people have tried similar approaches to beat roulette. But they will look at "streaks", which is like looking at a 3d object with one eye.

I would have agreed to this. But knowing they have 6-7 for sure towers all over the world to generate these number's you have to be very presise in knowing which tower and what time. Unlike the  wave which is where you are at that moment

[foogus]

The actual limit is 60000 per day per IP.