Thank God for Randomness...

[ignatus]

Had some luck with this one:

Bet all doublestreets, after 1 spin remove the current hit doublestreet, and +1 bet on all other ds. OK now, keep the same bet and +1u bet for each loss, and each doublestreet hit is removed until all doublestreets are hit. 

Then restart: bet all doublesteets, do one spin,

* remove any ds hit, until all is hit
*+1u bet for each loss

Thank God for randomness....

[rouletteKEY]

Just to throw this out...not sure what this post has to do with randomness but...waiting for the last sleeper usually doesn't end well.

Maybe just targeting the 5th of the 6 DS'  That way you are only betting on two for a shorter period of time.  (will keep your outlay down and progression numbers lower...remember every progression doesn't have to end in profit...sometimes getting a decent chunk back and getting out of the bet to live another day is victory enough...think of the big picture)

I don't play doublestreets but if I was playing for a sleeper (which I would be highly unlikely to do) I would start testing by waiting for four different DS's to show and then use a mild progression with a stop-loss on the other two and play for one win...so once the 5th showed I was out of the bet.  If testing showed it made a profit in more cases than not then maybe up the base base on the attack after a loss to try to regain ground against my overall bank.

Just a suggestion Ignatus as another place to investigate...I don't play DS's   Another way might be to wait for that last one to hit and then play it for awhile with a mild progression positive or negative and hope for a decent run over a 12-18 spin sequence....get a few hits quick, get out...if it goes right back to sleep...get out quick then too and re-track

[Steve]

I'm not sure what you are saying, but the thread title is basically saying "thank god for unpredictability".

Please explain what you mean.

[amk]

Can both randomness and balance exist at the sametime?

Perhaps all randomness is part of a balance, and balance exists out of randomness

If this is the case then I understand why balancing happens but not the randomness?

[Steve]

You cant beat roulette by waiting for balance.

Say you get 100 reds, and 1 black... and:

Player 1 thinks: ooh red is on a streak, so they bet red.

Plater 2 thinks: ooh black is DUE, so they bet black.

This situation happens 1,000,000 times.

WHO WINS?

Neither. Because in every case, the odds of winning on each spin are still less than 50/50. And even when they won, they still receive an unfair payout.

Anyone who understands this will understand why most systems fail.

[ignatus]

I'm not sure what you are saying, but the thread title is basically saying "thank god for unpredictability".

Please explain what you mean.

from this short test randomness been in my favor, that means it's so random that every doublestreet will hit in enough time to make profit....that what i mean, randomness will strive to hit equally around the carpet (or the wheel) in the long run and this is a mystery ...this method takes advantage of this phenomenon

[ignatus]

one tweak is to restart when there is only one ds left (don't bet the last ds)...

[Turner]

And what if zero hits first spin. Just bet nothing then the 5 that didnt hit. Same outcome. Still a daft idea.

[ignatus]

it's not a daft idea, why? randomness strive to hit equally around the wheel and the carpet, now to avoid greater losses , don't bet the last two ds.

im still experimenting with this bet, and if you have better ideas (tweaks) let me know...

[ignatus]

Further tweak: -don't bet the last 3 ds. Double for each loss

[ignatus]

Further tweak: -don't bet the last 3 ds. Double for each loss

+1000 in 500 spins, (5u bets) no major drawdown.

i can't show you the chart since i have no internet connection of my own, but it looks good so far

[teo]

from this short test randomness been in my favor, that means it's so random that every doublestreet will hit in enough time to make profit....that what i mean, randomness will strive to hit equally around the carpet (or the wheel) in the long run and this is a mystery ...this method takes advantage of this phenomenon

Would suggest you find a thread by Flatino,called;Let win...and you will find out nothing phenomenom about.

[ignatus]

Would suggest you find a thread by Flatino,called;Let win...and you will find out nothing phenomenom about.

would suggest you try playing it before comming with this "smart" comments. How can you judge at all when you have no idea?

i said +1000 in 500 spins, (5u bets) no major drawdown

[Steve]

If you are designing a system around "balance", this wont work and I explained why. It has been tried countless times before.

[system player]

This system is already in" roulette secrets"