Roulette computer for sale

[Steve]

Roulette computer for sale

See How a Roulette Computer Team Won £1.3 Million In 3 Days::.youtube.com/watch?v=zOivlYqAIZk (Also download video from roulette-computers.com/ritz.wmv) Basically roulette computers are hidden devices that measure ball and wheel speed to predict the winning number. They are by the quickest and most effective way to beat roulette. They are legal in approximately half of casinos, but you must apply […]

Source: Roulette computer for sale

[GARNabby]

Casinos are such SOB's that I think that they would shut a game down once it becomes unregulatable.  I suspect that this notion is written into even basic gaming law.

[ausguy]

Like any good parasite you don't kill the host you just "milk" it without them even knowing.

With so many "beasts" to choose from, sharing yourself around is the obvious way to go. I believe, Steve, this is already part of your players MO strategy ?

[Steve]

1. No casino tolerates consistent winners. They'll do whatever they must to stop winners.

2. They know professional players and roulette computers are around, but they rely on detection of them, then changing the game procedures until the players leave.

3. Some casinos stopped offering roulette because the regulators no longer consider it a "fair random" game. ie they believe it is too exploitable. This is an extreme and very rare measure though, so I dont expect that trend will become widespread.

4. Winning is half the problem. Then you need to avoid detection. Both are not difficult though. Especially with the roulette computers, the teams swap the winners to increase winning (more covert this way). But 2-3 members is enough, or you have to split between more members while taking too much from the wheel

[GARNabby]

Like any good parasite you don't kill the host you just "milk" it without them even knowing.

I think that you mean symbiosis.

sym·bi·o·sis
ËŒsimbÄ"ˈōsis,-bÄ«-/Submit
noun
1. interaction between two different organisms living in close physical association, typically to the advantage of both.

The casino word for that is shill.

Real parasites tend to kill the host.

With so many "beasts" to choose from, sharing yourself around is the obvious way to go.

With so many, it would appear that there's "no cure for the beasts".

[ausguy]

GARNabby - SYMBIOSIS ?        ".....typically to the advantage of both". I think not, when most players lose, so in reality it's only the casino that has the reward advantage.

Not all parasites kill their host. They are the ones I had in mind. Leeches are a classic example. The blood sucking ones get their fill & once bloated drop off their host. Once all is digested they then find another host or it could even be the same host, whatever the case they're re-running their successful process. Other annoying bastards are tapeworms, hair nits, scabies, bed bugs, crabs (in pubes), mites. Sure some can be bad, like ticks that release toxins that can do you in.

So we are now in the age of the casino leech. Armed with one of Steve's new roulette computers he/she/they attach themselves to the host casino.

Once "bloated" they drop off the host, consider their position & either, sooner or later, re-attach themselves to the same host or locate themselves to a new host.

Casinos are extremely concerned about this new breed of "parasite". 

[GARNabby]

Once "bloated" they drop off the host, consider their position & either, sooner or later, re-attach themselves to the same host or locate themselves to a new host.

link:://croatiantimes.com/?id=6752

Could you imagine what would happen if someone figured out how to beat a casino?  People are leeches too.

[ausguy]

GARNabby -  You said, "People are leeches too"  I already said that with my,...."We are now in the age of the casino leech".

Re: The Croation Times (CT) story it's like "journalists" everywhere = NEVER LET THE TRUTH GET IN THE WAY OF A GOOD STORY.

Just checking on the human blood held volume. A 70 kg person has about 5 litres of blood & maybe this lighter older woman who died, 4 litres ?

The CT story is saying that the leeches sucked her dry, meaning a BS 4L ?  To do that would need 100's of the buggers ? I don't think any medico would have hundreds of them in use ?

Within the story it was revealed that the woman was 86 & had heart disease + other withheld (by her) health conditions ? The autopsy found 32 bite wounds & estimated 1 litre of blood was lost ? (That seems excessive, unless they're gaint size leeches because 1,000ml/32 = 31.25ml per leech = 2 table spoons +). An "expert" admitted that if the elderly woman was in good health the blood sucking would not have killed her.

Blood donors usually give just under 1/2 litre per visit. The Red Cross site said the body replaces that lost blood in 24 - 48 hours. On google a site said that a 40% blood loss can be fatal. 40% of 4L = 1.6 L. If in good health the old woman would most likely have lived by still having 3 litres within her ?

[GARNabby]

Hi, ausguy.

That was an interesting post.  Thanks for the time you put into it.

[Steve]

Certainly true about journalism and truth. They are paid to make it "interesting", to sell advertising. Not to be factual and boring.

The woman that died should also be responsible for herself. You'd need to be nuts to have that many leeches on you and think it would be ok. But I believe its primarily the "doctor's" responsibility.

As for casinos and winning players, the casinos know there are consistent winners. Casino surveillance used to focus on their own staff, now its one everyone. But if the player does it right, its like finding a needle in a haystack for surveillance staff.

[rajucb12]

Casinos are this sort of SOB's which i feel that they'd sealed an activity straight down the moment that gets unregulated. My spouse and i suppose this view is created in perhaps basic gaming rules. With a great number of "beasts" to pick from, sharing your self around is the evident path to take. In my opinion, Charlie, this is already component of your people MO technique?