The "middles" betting concept

[Asxetos]

Betting the repeaters(dominant) results in a loss … we have seen it so many times in all systems.
Betting the sleepers results in a loss … we have also seen it so many times in all systems.

But what about the middle ones??? Not the repeaters and not the sleepers but the ones in the middle.

Roulette is a dynamic game and if there is a way to beat it it has to be dynamic too.
By choosing to bet the “middles” we are acting dynamic for sure.

Example of playing the middle ones.

Track all the streets.
In every spin watch the street with the more hits eg . 5 times hit.
Also watch the street with the less hits                 eg.0 times hit.
So now bet all the streets that have 2 and 3 hits!

Notice:
Because this kind of betting is dynamic, in every new spin we have to always watch/observe 2 things
1) If a new street has come in or out of the range of the middles.(in the above example = 2 and 3 hits).
So we have to bet new streets ot take out of the bet streets that has won and got out of the range of betting.

2) We also have to watch/observe in every new spin if the most and less hit streets have change because we have to set new range of the “middles”

This was only a concept  that I chose to share with you.
You can bet other bets too except Streets with the same concept.
Its your choice.

If we have a big defference in the most and less hit street we can chose more middle bets .

eg . street most hit 15 street less hit 5.
so instead of chosing only the streets with  10 hits(exact middle) we can chose a bigger range like 9,10,11 hits.

It would be nice to hear some opinions about the concept and if it has been tested before.

[SamNL]

Very interesting observation Asxetos,

I just gave it a whirl on DB.

Streets 2, 7, 11 were the middle ones and they all hit after each other.

First street 2 after that street 7 and after that street 11 hit.

[warrior]

I don't really respond to any more systems but this one is interesting,I tweaked this a bit and I'm using a cycle of 6 on Line bets ,I'm sure it will work on streets with a cycle of 12. Nice idea

[iggiv]

as every stiff pattern, this one is doomed on a long run, sorry. Just test it in RX or manually with German casino data.
And the fact that this one is based on the table layout even though with inside bets (streets) makes it even worse.

[warrior]

as every stiff pattern, this one is doomed on a long run, sorry. Just test it in RX or manually with German casino data.
And the fact that this one is based on the table layout even though with inside bets (streets) makes it even worse.

If done in cycles it can can produce a profit ,and for get about long run what ever that means ,it's not how much you win it's how little you lose.

[iggiv]

I am not gonna argue too much. You can try it. You will see it for yourself. It can be used sometimes combined with other methods. If you gonna use it as it is frequently for long time you will see what happens.

[warrior]

I'm not arguing we know  all systems fail but it is possible to make a little money.long term is over used this is all I'm saying .

[iggiv]

i am not so sure about "all systems failing". But all stiff patterns fail for sure. Now the question is how you make "a little money". if you play regularly with such a method it will fail for sure. if you play once in a while you may win. But if this once in a while gonna last for years there gonna be eventually failure again.

[warrior]

If conditions are right you can win for a long time if not all systems,and phisics will fail .

[Turner]

I found a good return playing the numbers which are sandwiched between repeats.
22 5 33 14 29 22
Play 5 33 14 29. Same concept really.
Theres more to it than that...but thats the basic core