Some may understand this some may not.

[TwoCatSam]

What concerns me with these bet selections, is that two players who didn't start tracking at the same time, could have a trigger at the same time but on opposite dozens.

Could I get an example of this?

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Moving on....it works soso ....but they all do. Try extremely voodoo !!!

What is "extremely voodoo"?

[TwoCatSam]

Wait for a rare event then bet against it.

But you wait forever and a day!!

And then you're chances are the same as if you had never waited.

Sorry, it's true.

Sam

[ati]

What concerns me with these bet selections, is that two players who didn't start tracking at the same time, could have a trigger at the same time but on opposite dozens.

Could I get an example of this?

Sam

Sorry, I looked at it again and I was wrong. With this system it doesn't matter if player 2 stars tracking at a different spin.

[TwoCatSam]

Well, I hate to rock the ol' proverbial boat, but.............

This idea would work much, much better using the last two dozens to come.  I tried it today and it did alright, but it would have been much better using the last two.

Why?

Because dozens do two things:  They get hot and go to sleep.  When They get hot it looks like this:


1
1
1
1
1
2


When they are cold, it's like this:

2
3
2
3
2
3


Either way, betting the last two will get you a winner.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

So what happened?  Why is there no action on this thread?

Frankly, this is a pretty good method of play and I am going to try my hardest to make it better.  Is it "it"?  No, I doubt it, but it is a very viable method of play.

Am I wrong, or was this "it"?  Now everyone is chasing another rabbit!  Where are you who sent me all the stuff and told me how "he" won thousands? 

I just don't get it...........

Sam

[ati]

I believe some guys discussing it in private. I will definitely do more tests, probably around next weekend.
I used to play double dozens with a modified D'Alembert progression, to make it as safe as I can. What I did was starting with 1 unit on two dozens, after a loss 2 units, on a win back to 1 unit. (break even) If the 2 units lost, I bet 3 units, but I only went back to 2 units if I won twice in a row. If I won the first one with 3 units, and lost the second one, I bet 4 units, but only needed one win to go back to 3.
I know it's not the simplest progression and can be very slow, and requires progression tracking, but at least there is no need for hundreds of units for a session to play.

[denzie]

Like i said...it works soso... and this is NOT it. They saw 7l's only 1 time in 3 years...uuuuhhuuu... I've seen that twice already.  Same with that cute sunny cube....what a load of cra........

[TwoCatSam]

ati

My tests are with real quarters.  (Big spender!!)  Your progression is a good one.  I had Nick program that into a test sheet for the bot a while back. 

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

denzie

Yes, the sun square is just numbers that sometimes predict the winner.  Most times they don't.

Sam

[denzie]

Sam ,

About the square. ...was a good laugh.
About the voodoo...it's a thread from Nowun ...extremely voodoo
About your twist here on the dozens...what progression you suggest?

[denzie]

*extremely simple voodoo method

[probasah]

So what happened?  Why is there no action on this thread?

Frankly, this is a pretty good method of play and I am going to try my hardest to make it better.  Is it "it"?  No, I doubt it, but it is a very viable method of play.

Am I wrong, or was this "it"?  Now everyone is chasing another rabbit!  Where are you who sent me all the stuff and told me how "he" won thousands? 

I just don't get it...........

Sam

Hey Sam,

Tested this on 5000 spins. Positive result. Tested on another 5000 spins. Not only it wiped away the first winnings, very big dd.
Method says not more than 7 loses in a row. That is BS. Test it on any 10000 RNG numbers, or live spins or whatever. I guarantee you WILL see not only 7 but 8L in a column or more.
Results are as expected. Take any random double dozens bet method and you will get the same results.
Bets were in average 3 bets per 100 spins. When you get that L L L L L L  after three loses LLL  (trigger), Not only you need a huge Bankroll to begin with but you have to wait like crazy to actually bet.

Sam, i think the Holy Cow (Grail!) is about MONEY MANAGEMENT. not about bet selection.
I think there are some players that have found what works and what doesnt, but no one is speaking out loud.
Matrixes and "secret" formulas are simply BS.

Best regards,
Alex

[Chris555p]

The author of the system says clearly not to play it on rng.....; I have been playing it at real BM live dealer and autowheel;
and hit rate is extraordinarily high; In more than 1 week of playing I have never seen any LLL after 2LL. It works perfectly for
me.

[probasah]

The author of the system says clearly not to play it on rng.....; I have been playing it at real BM live dealer and autowheel;
and hit rate is extraordinarily high; In more than 1 week of playing I have never seen any LLL after 2LL. It works perfectly for
me.

Hey Chris,
I am not talking without knowledge. How about an example with 12k RNG numbers. You can verify for yourself. The trigger was 3 LLL. (3 not 2LL)

         
   consecutive loses in a column:       12  ..................................    12L! not 7L!
   consecutive BET loses       9
   total spins #   12288   
   Total Bets   293   
   Av.Bets100 spins   2.38444   
         
   Wins   183   
   Loses 110   

See attached docx with W/L history.
I will attach as well the list with the 12k numbers
Now i ask you this:How can anyone deal with 9 consecutive Loses (imagine Martingale) AFTER 3 LLL as a trigger?


PS:If you or anyone else wants to test any list with live spins, give me the list and i will give you the results.

Best regards,
Alex