• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

VIDEO: The best way to beat roulette

Started by Steve, Oct 07, 08:14 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Steve

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

If you wanted to know how it compares to other computers that require clicking buttons to take timings:

* Manual clicks each have an error of about 50ms. The computer in the video has an error of about 1ms because it detects the ball multiple times on each pass. So it gets predictions much earlier, and with much greater accuracy.

* The hybrid never gets tired, and doesnt make mistakes. Players dont even need to look at the wheel.

* Any amount of players can get predictions. You can have even 5 players at the same wheel, all betting on different numbers (to cover multiple peaks). None of the nonsense like bluetooth muses for just 1 extra player, with transmissions like radio beacons with constant emission and no encryption (even a simple bluetooth scans detects this). In contrast, the Hybrid computer's transmissions are impossible for casinos to detect.

* It takes timings of rotor and ball simultaneously. With the exception of my Uber verion computer, all other computers require clocking of first rotor, then ball (or reverse order). A problem with this is you may not even get timings before no more bets is called. The Uber also allows multiple users clocking the wheel AT THE SAME TIME, so errors are reduced to near nothing.

For a comparison of all roulette computers, see :.roulette-computers.com/comparison.htm

Another page is:
link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=20664.0

If you dont understand the information, you probably dont have the right mindset for roulette computers. You may even be duped into believing a $500 computer is better.

There's a lot more to it. If you visit me to see it, you'll understand why some computers are $500, why the hybrid is $80,000, why I've been sent numerous other computers for free by people who bought them, and why some people have a pre-occupation with attacking me. You'll also understand why the hybrid cost several hundred thousand dollars and 3 years to develop, and why simplistic computers can be coded for $50 by a programmer in India. If you want only simplistic computers, save yourself from paying $500 to other developers as I give similar computers for $0.00 to my players.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

judgeholdem1848

I consider you to be the world's foremost expert on roulette, by a shot so long you need a telescope to see the barrel*.  The rest run from lacking down an 89 degree slope, dropping below zero into a hades of fevered delusion. 

I've learned quite a bit from your websites and posts, including and especially this one.  For a bit of fun, you might guess on which point.  In that sense, you're my roulette professor.  Thanks.  Sincerely.

*An interesting question, and maybe the only one you or your team might feel inclined to answer, is, "how many guys are there in the world who could explain the schematic to the Hybrid Computer or analogue in detail?"  It's hard to believe we're it.  But like SETI, there's no extant evidence — of which I'm aware — that we're not. 

-