XOXOX or "Tic Tac Toe" by Dane

[amk]

2Cat,

I think it might boil down to playing or creating a new method everytime you play?

You play for just one win, or.... a total loss of your progression or flat bet to -25% of your BR......

Once you reach 1000 methods played once, you play all the winning methods once again, after this round you play the new remaining winning methods once again etc. Just one idea.

To be honest I think I will never be a able to play 1000 methods once in a live casino or even on a online live casino.

[TwoCatSam]

amk

I see this as sort of a hit and run--and one that might have merit.  I will admit, there are few times I go to the casino when I am not up 25% of my bankroll in the beginning.  (Those few times can kill!)  Rotating systems is a great idea.

My problem is universal:  I am there!  I don't want to quit and go home.  I just drove 30 miles and have played one hour or less.  My bankroll is so small, I only make $10 or so before I have to leave.  Where's the fun in that?

So maybe I need to switch systems constantly and pretend I'm someone else!

Sam

[GLC]

George

For years I sought a logical answer as to why something would or would not win.  With the exception of the unlimited bankroll coupled with the table with no limit, I never have found it.  Most things are voodoo.  Look at the stuff Proofreader posts.  Is there a reason why betting the way he does makes sense?  Or Mr J and his "Two's Company".  Or XOXOX.  None of them make sense by math or logic.

So I consider everything voodoo of some sort.  John Legend's "Pattern Breaker" was based on a flawed logic and look how that turned out.

I do believe that a person who sits in one place will be overlooked before he will be hit.  XOXOX moves about a lot as does the two by Mr J.  Perhaps that's it.  Proof's systems only bet for a limited time and then change or quit.  Perhaps that's it.

I am going to do an extensive test of Mr J's "A Method With Teeth".  He claims that to be his number one system/method other than the two he won't discuss.  I will use the Zuma tester and will open a thread when I get some data.

The more I study roulette and random, the more I come to realize my ignorance on the subjects.

TwoCat

I'm in total agreement with every word you just wrote.  I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.  Also, playing the wheel vs the table shouldn't make any difference unless there is such a thing as dealer signature.  Flawed wheels are less likely, and should be a thing of the past.  Nevertheless, this system would capitalize on a flawed wheel as well.

I went out to our local casino today and tested my wheel based adaptation to our airball machine and walked away with over 100 units (quarter units is all they have down here).  Is there such a thing as airball wheel signature?  I can't tell for sure, but I'm leaning toward "Yes!" for our airball machine.  Every system I've tried playing that would do better if a signature existed has won.  Maybe not enough to prove beyond a doubt a signature exists, but more promising than if I had lost.

When dealing with such a small disadvantage, it can be easily overcome with slightly better than odds spins your way.  And that can go on for a very long time before the hammer falls the other way.

Keep trying to have fun.

GLC

Edit:  While I was typing, you posted your last post.  I have that same problem.  It's hard to get a balance between betting enough to make it interesting and risking more than you can afford to lose.

[MrJ]

George

For years I sought a logical answer as to why something would or would not win.  With the exception of the unlimited bankroll coupled with the table with no limit, I never have found it.  Most things are voodoo.  Look at the stuff Proofreader posts.  Is there a reason why betting the way he does makes sense?  Or Mr J and his "Two's Company".  Or XOXOX.  None of them make sense by math or logic.

So I consider everything voodoo of some sort.  John Legend's "Pattern Breaker" was based on a flawed logic and look how that turned out.

I do believe that a person who sits in one place will be overlooked before he will be hit.  XOXOX moves about a lot as does the two by Mr J.  Perhaps that's it.  Proof's systems only bet for a limited time and then change or quit.  Perhaps that's it.

I am going to do an extensive test of Mr J's "A Method With Teeth".  He claims that to be his number one system/method other than the two he won't discuss.  I will use the Zuma tester and will open a thread when I get some data.

The more I study roulette and random, the more I come to realize my ignorance on the subjects.

TwoCat

Yeah, there is no way I believe....pick ANY numbers, it makes no difference. Only the lazy person (not you Sam) thinks this way. Cant tell you how many times I have fallen asleep while driving because I only got 2 hours of sleep.....up all night testing roulette ideas.

Ken

[Dane]

Yeah, there is no way I believe....pick ANY numbers, it makes no difference. Only the lazy person (not you Sam) thinks this way. Cant tell you how many times I have fallen asleep while driving because I only got 2 hours of sleep.....up all night testing roulette ideas.

Ken

"THE HIGHWAY IS FOR GAMBLERS, BETTER USE YOUR SENSE
TAKE WHAT YOU HAVE GATHERED FROM COINCIDENCE" (Bob Dylan)

Lack of sleep might be as dangerous as drinking & driving!
I myself get additionel rest through Transcendental Meditation;
and I have meditated almost as long as film maker Davin Lynch.
Unfortunately learning this scientifically validated method nowadays
may cost as much as a new car 

[Drazen]

Dane

Reading your posts and methods I see great understanding and knowledge in combinatorics.

Concernig tic- tac- toe on roulette, I wonder what Alfred W. Hales and Robert I. Jewett would say about your ideas discussed here

Cheers

[Dane]

Dane

Reading your posts and methods I see great understanding and knowledge in combinatorics.

Concernig tic- tac- toe on roulette, I wonder what Alfred W. Hales and Robert I. Jewett would say about your ideas discussed here

Cheers

Thanks! Most of us don´t  know these persons.
Maybe you can Enlighten us?

TIME is still essential.
Recently I have combined somewhat strange criteria with a DEADLINE:
At least THREE repeated numbers in FIVE of the six well known DS.
Counting those is easier than counting spins.


               

[Drazen]

Well their theorem is one of the techniques in Ramsey theory. Also,one of the members here recently pointed it would be useful to research on that subject. And that member seems to found a way to create very nice edge over the game 

I still think all that is a bit of long winding process but maybe for some it might be worth in the end.

Concerning Tic tac toe, simply said, these gents proved that certain types of this game cannot end in a draw.

Cheers

[Dane]

DRAW.  It reminds me
that I have a CHESS appointment to keep tomorrow.
Apart from that: Thanks for the information.