chingy 711

[Tomla021]

anyone else try this ,, i tried some bacc hands  and it did well but of course there will be bad moments:
Its not my strategy I just saw it--belongs to chingy


This is a strategy which I have come up with, I have
  tested it with multiple random number generators
  and have been using it in live play. So far it has
  it been producing very good results in live play.
  Presently there are a few members of this forum
  using it and a few personal friends. If you would
  like to get a little more insight into the strategy
  I suggest you read the Red/Black thread here on
  the forum. I have received a few IM’s from members
  asking for more details and can the strategy be
  used with a small bankroll, so I thought I’d try to
  lay out the strategy in a separate thread.

  First let me say this is not the so called “Holy Grail.”
  So if your looking for an easy way to win this
  definitely isn’t it. This is a grind and there’s no
  guarantees you’ll win.

  The strategy is based on streaks of red and black.
  All your bets will be determined by the color of the
  prior spin. The theory behind the strategy is that
  the law of appearance states all series of even money
  chances will account for 3/4 of all trials and single
  even money chance only account for 1/4 of those
  trails. A series is 2 or more of the same (RR, BB, RRR,
  BBB, RRRR, BBBB, .....) If you were to run a RNG
  test of 100,000 spins, 75,000 of those spins would
  approximately account for series of 2 or more and the
  remaining 25,000 spins would account for single events.
  I know it may sound crazy, but it is true! The Laws
  of Distribution and Appearance can easily be verified.
  Yes there will always be deviations but if you ran
  many test you’ll see the ratio always comes near that
  3/4 series to 1/4 single events. The theory of this strategy
  is to try to capitalize on those series of red and black.

  The strategy has 4 levels of play, with each level giving
    you 6 betting steps. The odds of losing 6 of these betting
    steps is approximately 1 in 64. Thus for the strategy to
    totally collapse the odds are approximately (1 in 64) (1 in 64)
    (1 in 64) (1 in 64). In my RNG testing I did suffer a few
    total losts of all 4 levels. The thing is I was way
    ahead at the time and was able to handle the losts, and
    each time I was able to recover my losts and reach new
    highs before the next lost. In my limited live play of the
    strategy I haven’t yet suffered a lost of all 4 levels. I’m
    up a little over $6,000 in live play and a lost is definitely
    due. The strategy requires a sizable bankroll of 173 units,
    if you use $10 units that amounts to $1,730 investment.
   
    I have scaled the bankroll down for one of the members
    here on the forum and as of today he’s doing well and
    up about $1,000 but only plays for a 5% profit goal per
    session. I also have a personal friend who plays this
    strategy with $50 units and HAS had one lost so far,
    but even after that lost he is still showing a profit of
    over $15,000.

    Remember this strategy is based on a “hit and run” game.
    I personally only play for 4 to 5 units profit per table. I
    average any where between 4 to 40 spins per session.
    Must of the time I reach my goal of 4 to 5 units per table in
    under 20 spins and then move to another table.

    Here are the bets for the strategy:
        (Level 1 - $10-$16-$22-$28-$34-$40 = $150 (Up $6 on a lost, down $4 on win.)
        (Level 2 - $15-$24-$33-$42-$51-$60 = $225 (Up $9 on a lost, down $6 on win.)
        (Level 3 - $30-$48-$66-$84-$102-$120 = $450 ( Up $18 on a lost, down $12 on win.)
        (Level 4 - $60-$96-$132-$168-$204-$240 = $900 ( Up $36 on a lost, down $24 on win.)
      Any two consecutive wins decrease to whatever level value of the that level, (if Level 3
      and win two bets in a row instead of going down $18 you decrease by $30),
      but never lower than the starting level amount.

      Sorry, I have to run, have to be on job sight early to met architect. I know their
      will be questions and will definitely try to answer as soon as possible.
      I have made some tweeks to the strategy since playing live play and will
      pass them along later. I’ve tested hundreds of systems throughout the years
      and even though this may fail in the so called Long Run, I’m having fun with
      it and so far I’m well ahead! This is a grind and not for everyone.
                  Thanks to all those who have shown a interest!  Louie

[Rewster88]

Dont do this.. Did a run with real money about 2 years ago.. Start with 1000... After 6 days i was up 660 playing 2 sessions a day. After this it was like someone on willhill put the magnets on the roulettewheel on and i saw a losing streak that is still going on..lost every penny of my br including the profit. You will survivr one or 2 total loss.. But when it happens you recover the recover with the recover so please stay far away..

R

[RouletteGhost]

DO NOT PLAY AT WILLIAM HILL EVER

[Tomla021]

Hey people im not talking about william hill or bad internet gambling sites....I play only real casinos, I more want to know if you think it could win in general:)

[Rewster88]

Then still i go for the no..you can better play martingale then this

[sturrock]

DO NOT PLAY AT WILLIAM HILL EVER
Tell me about William Hill!!!!! That is where I play and get funny results, but just put it down to very bad luck 

[RouletteGhost]

william hill has very bad reviews

check casino meister

bad bad bad!

[nowun]

This method has many followers on one of the other forums where Chingy711 (Louie) originally posted it.  Like all rigid methods though it has it's failures.  Chingy is very honest though, he posts results of both his good and bad sessions.

[GLC]

I don't know if this matters at all other than to keep us all honest.  He states that if you play 100,000 hands, 75,000 of them will be singles.  From what I know about math, there will be 50,000 singles and 50,000 2 or mores.  Of the 50,000 2 or mores there will be 25,000 2's and 25,000 3 or mores, etc...  Just saying??

GLC

[GLC]

Here's a post that I made a few days ago that adds a little rationale to his increase amounts on losses and decrease amounts on wins.

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15389.msg132261#msg132261

GLC

[bleep24]

Re:   William Hill.

Are people warning about WH for RNG play or is Live Play (Dealer) suspect aswell.   We all know RNG is.  What`s this about magnets.  I have seen mention about magnets before but I thought it was dodgy casinos.  I volunteer to go under tables and check for devices and dealers legs!