Fallacy 3

[ignatus]

inspired by P.A's thread about variance and using streets for this method, i tried this fallacy myself with good results! 

OK, this is how i play

TRIGGER- wait until a minimum of 3 or black/red hits in a row, then when a switch of color comes, bet for the same color to hit again (or in this case any of the 6 streets bet hit) STOPLOSS after 3 losses in a row. if the color bet is hit , but not any of the streets hit STOP

If RED is bet, bet all the 6 street that contain 2 Reds in it.
If BLACK is bet, bet all the 6 streets that contain 2 Blacks in it

Progression +1/-1

First test was played with 1u bets

[Steve]

Try it over a statistically significant account of spins, then post again. Many systems with progression get similar charts then eventually tank.

[Chrisbis]

Hi Ignatus.
On first read the explanation of method is very confusing. ...
Is it a Colour EC bet or a Streets bet?
Cheers

Edit.....
Got it now