Multiple Martingale aka "how to turn $285 into $5300" continued......

[thelaw]

This will be a continuation of a thread that was locked after it derailed into infighting (note that I was part of the problem, so I figured we could at least get something constructive out of it).

The discussion left off with several members wanting to test a 1-2-4-8 Marti over 1000s of spins with possible virtual bets of 2-4 losses.

Here is what I propose :

1) Start with a simple Martingale with 2 virtual losses followed by 1-2-4-8

2) Then a larger Martingale or other system to cover these lost bets (EX. 3 step Labby using 5 units per line=15 after you win 3 bets)

Then we can continue to add larger bets when necessary with each step/system to recover

Go back to #1 after new high.

[denzie]

What I really like to see is ....

RRR
RRRR
RRRRR
RRRRRR
etc....or any ec

If we know this in let's say 250spin sessions..tested over 1000's sets. Then we would get a pretty good idea how and when to bet. Wouldn't we ?

[thelaw]

What I really like to see is ....

RRR
RRRR
RRRRR
RRRRRR
etc....or any ec

If we know this in let's say 250spin sessions..tested over 1000's sets. Then we would get a pretty good idea how and when to bet. Wouldn't we ?

If we go in assuming it will tank, then we can add another system for the second step to recoup. So just a matter of when, not if it will fail.

Essentially we are asking; "what are the chances that a Labby will fail right after a Marti failed.

We can stack these into a workable system long term.