BA Marty Prog On A Dozen

amk · Mar 09, 07:38 AM 2016

I wanted to see how rare people think the following session is.

It uses the BA marty prog on a Dozen instead of an EC (if you have been following BAs approach then you will understand the details in this post)

The below BA example is taken from the American Wheel. I am starting at spin 9 and go to spin 224. It has 86 RED hits in 215 spins.

Because this stat can apply to any of the ECs I can also apply it to Low and Dozen 1 (1-12)

However, for testing I turned 12 RED numbers into a Dozen (1,3,5,7,9,12,14,16,18,19,21,23)

In 215 spins this Dozen was hit 62 times, a 28% hit rate.

It went to a betting level of 16 units for 1 spin (BAs approach on RED went to 64 units), largest drawdown -91 (BAs largest drawdown -451), the zeros hit 13 times (twice as much as would have happend on the single zero wheel)

Lets say I did not get into he plus on spin 215, I would have had 4 more marty prog betting levels for a total of 148 more spins. That would total 363 spins.

Look only at the numbers spun (2nd column) and the total result in the far right, column 5 (all other data is irrelevant)
At spin 73 I achieve a 0 balance and start at betting level of 1 unit again.

9. 4 -1 -3 -1
10. 8 -1 -4 -2
11. 8 -1 -5 -3
12. 24 -1 -6 -4
13. 22 -1 -7 -5
14. 11 -1 -8 -6
15. 2 -1 -9 -7
16. 17 -1 -10 -8
17. 26 -1 -11 -9
18. 1 +1 -10 -7
19. 22 -1 -11 -8
20. 7 +1 -10 -6
21. 28 -1 -11 -7
22. 24 -1 -12 -8
23. 13 -1 -13 -9
24. 18 +1 -12 -7
25. 36 +1 -11 -8
26. 20 -1 -12 -9
27. 15 -1 -13 -10
28. 13 -1 -14 -11
29. 13 -1 -15 -12
30. 15 -1 -16 -13
31. 15 -1 -17 -14
32. 12 +1 -16 -12
33. 13 -1 -17 -13
34. 11 -1 -18 -14
35. 24 -1 -19 -15
36. 00 -1 -20 -16
37. 00 -1 -21 -17
38. 28 -2 -23 -18
39. 4 -2 -25 -19
40. 19 +2 -23 -17
41. 26 -2 -25 -18
42. 9 +2 -23 -16
43. 24 -2 -25 -17
44. 34 +2 -23 -18
45. 14 +2 -21 -16
46. 9 +2 -19 -12 go to 2 units +4 -2
47. 8 -2 -21 -14
48. 24 -2 -23 -16
49. 23 +2 -21 -12
50. 27 +2 -19 -14
51. 25 +2 -17 -16
52. 24 -2 -19 -18
53. 13 -2 -21 -20
54. 29 -2 -23 -22
55. 18 +2 -21 -18
56. 4 -2 -23 -20
57. 1 +2 -21 -16
58. 12 +2 -19 -12
59. 00 -2 -21 -14
60. 10 -2 -23 -16
61. 8 -2 -25 -18
62. 20 -2 -27 -20
63. 18 +2 -25 -16
64. 18 +2 -23 -12
65. 18 +2 -21 -8
66. 7 +2 -19 -4
67. 33 -2 -21 -6
68. 31 -2 -23 -8
69. 21 +2 -21 -4
70. 28 -2 -23 -6
71. 23 +2 -21 -2
72. 22 -2 -23 -4
73. 21 +2 -21 0 betting 1 unit as total went back to 0
74. 31 -2 -23 -1
75. 35 -4 -27 -2
76. 9 +4 -23 0
77. 31 -4 -27 -1
78. 25 +4 -23 -2
79. 32 +4 -19 -3
80. 35 -4 -23 -4
81. 27 +4 -19 -5
82. 29 -4 -23 -6
83. 31 -4 -27 -7
84. 23 +4 -23 -5
85. 6 -4 -27 -6
86. 20 -4 -31 -7
87. 1 +4 -27 -5
88. 13 -4 -31 -6
89. 7 +4 -27 -4
90. 27 +4 -23 -5
91. 26 -4 -27 -6
92. 34 +4 -23 -7
93. 29 -4 -27 -8
94. 33 -4 -31 -9
95. 00 -4 -35 -10
96. 17 -4 -39 -11
97. 34 +4 -35 -12
98. 28 -4 -39 -13
99. 1 +4 -35 -11
100. 6 -4 -39 -12
101. 22 -4 -43 -13
102. 3 +4 -39 -11
103. 35 -4 -43 -12
104. 4 -4 -47 -13
105. 2 -4 -51 -14
106. 34 +4 -47 -15
107. 5 +4 -43 -13
108. 36 +4 -39 -14
109. 33 -4 -43 -15
110. 10 -4 -47 -16
111. 3 +4 -43 -14
112. 15 -8 -51 -15
113. 24 -8 -59 -17 betting 2 units +4 -2
114. 27 +8 -51 -19
115. 36 +8 -43 -21
116. 16 +8 -35 -17
117. 23 +8 -27 -13
118. 9 +8 -19 -9
119. 2 -8 -27 -11
120. 22 -8 -35 -13
121. 21 +8 -27 -9
122. 11 -8 -35 -11
123. 33 -8 -43 -13
124. 00 -8 -51 -15
125. 19 +8 -43 -11
126. 12 +8 -35 -13
127. 16 +8 -27 -9
128. 14 +8 -19 -5
129. 31 -8 -27 -7
130. 8 -8 -35 -9
131. 1 +8 -27 -5
132. 19 +8 -19 -1
133. 11 -8 -27 -3
134. 8 -8 -35 -5
135. 20 -8 -43 -7
136. 15 -8 -51 -9
137. 19 +8 -43 -5
138. 25 +8 -35 -7
139. 28 -8 -43 -9
140. 31 -8 -51 -11
141. 32 +8 -43 -13
142. 11 -8 -51 -15
143. 4 -8 -59 -17
144. 21 +8 -51 -13
145. 6 -8 -59 -15
146. 28 -8 -67 -17
147. 8 -8 -75 -19
148. 00 -8 -83 -21
149. 33 -16 -99 -23
150. 35 -16 -115 -27 betting 4 units +8 -4
151. 20 -16 -131 -31
152. 5 +16 -115 -23
153. 34 +16 -99 -27
154. 4 -16 -115 -31
155. 21 +16 -99 -23
156. 8 -16 -115 -27
157. 3 +16 -99 -19
158. 20 -16 -115 -23
159. 0 -16 -131 -27
160. 00 -16 -147 -31
161. 10 -16 -163 -35
162. 10 -16 -179 -39
163. 22 -16 -195 -43
164. 0 -16 -211 -47
165. 16 +16 -195 -39
166. 9 +16 -179 -31
167. 0 -16 -195 -35
168. 11 -16 -211 -39
169. 35 -16 -227 -43
170. 9 +16 -211 -35
171. 00 -16 -227 -39
172. 26 -16 -243 -43
173. 29 -16 -259 -47
174. 33 -16 -275 -51
175. 0 -16 -291 -55
176. 11 -16 -307 -59
177. 29 -16 -323 -63
178. 32 +16 -307 -67
179. 24 -16 -323 -71
180. 16 +16 -307 -63
181. 30 +16 -291 -67
182. 24 -16 -307 -71
183. 20 -16 -323 -75
184. 20 -16 -339 -79
185. 30 +16 -323 -83
186. 14 +32 -291 -75
187. 33 -32 -323 -83 betting 8 units +16 -8
188. 30 +32 -291 -91
189. 19 +32 -259 -75
190. 9 +32 -227 -59
191. 15 -32 -259 -67
192. 4 -32 -291 -75
193. 1 +32 -259 -59
194. 10 -32 -291 -67
195. 33 -32 -323 -75
196. 14 +32 -291 -59
197. 26 -32 -323 -67
198. 20 -32 -355 -75
199. 31 -32 -387 -83
200. 7 +32 -355 -67
201. 23 +32 -323 -51
202. 22 -32 -355 -59
203. 7 +32 -323 -43
204. 28 -32 -355 -51
205. 9 +32 -323 -35
206. 00 -32 -355 -43
207. 14 +32 -323 -27
208. 22 -32 -355 -35
209. 24 -32 -387 -43
210. 3 +32 -355 -27
211. 26 -32 -387 -35
212. 31 -32 -419 -43
213. 14 +32 -387 -27
214. 22 -32 -419 -35
215. 29 -32 -451 -43
216. 25 +32 -419 -51
217. 9 +32 -387 -35
218. 12 +32 -355 -19
219. 35 -32 -387 -27
220. 31 -32 -419 -35
221. 18 +32 -387 -19
222. 30 +32 -355 -27
223. 7 +64 -291 -11
224. 16 +64 -227 +21 betting 16 units +32 -16

JimmieB · Mar 09, 08:44 AM 2016

I tried something similar this morning on Sky Vegas RNG real money 1p stakes (big spender!!), although I was betting the 32,15,19 sector, and before anyone jumps on me for playing a sector on RNG, I know, it's just easier to determine where the ball is going to land after you press the spin button!!

Played a total of 16 games, 332 spins, +480 units, highest step in the progression was level 4, 8 units per number, however, this hit on spin 112 of that game, the first spin at that level. This was the toughest game, I only had 1 hit is the first 37 spins, 3 in the next 37, 3 again in the next 37,and as already mentioned the 1 hit on the first spin of the next 37 spins. This game netted me 171 units alone. At one stage I got BR back to 100 less than what I started with, and I thought about ending it and taking the loss, as I would still have been about 250 units plus for the full session, however, I played on and got in the plus. As I was playing fast RNG I didn't take much more info, except the amount of spins per game, and the hits per 37 spins, within each game, however my starting BR of 534 was never in any real danger. The last game which was the 112 spins, my starting BR was 843,and at one stage it went as low as about 650ish.

This is by no means grailish, however, I think it might have some merit, although not with EC's, minimum should be 1 dozen, and there will be games where you are probably best to quit if not ahead, although, you've had some wins, and you're getting high in the progression...as Winkel once mentioned the grind will kill you...

Jim

thelaw · Mar 09, 09:02 AM 2016

The other way to approach it would be to have multiple "dozens" going at once, and then bet when they reach a certain limit (like 64 units).......same for ec.

The key to this would be a stop-loss built in to avoid the inevitable crash.

For sure, this is a great deal of work, but also great financial reward, as your table limits would be much more than a standard progression. So if you started normally with 1 unit..........but here started with 1 unti (@64 units) it completely changes your table limits.

News:

BA Marty Prog On A Dozen

amk

JimmieB

thelaw