Multiplayer roulette ready

[Tomla021]

the amount of spins really dont mean as much as is talked about here.... unless its an absurdly low amount......
If people can win more in less spins and it continues , thats obviously the superior system by far!!!!!! the idea is to win as much as possible per spin.....continue doing that and you have the cats meow......

[RouletteGhost]

the amount of spins really dont mean as much as is talked about here.... unless its an absurdly low amount......
If people can win more in less spins and it continues , thats obviously the superior system by far!!!!!! the idea is to win as much as possible per spin.....continue doing that and you have the cats meow......

Thats how i feel

[denzie]

HE etc.... yeah if you play non stop the same thing. Yep it will catch you. But roulette has patterns that come and go. So triggers can work. For example. ... we see 7 times doz 1 repeat.  We gonna see that 3 times in one hour ? No. It's possible?  Yes. But will it ? No .

10x red. Cool. 15 minutes later another 10x red. Cool. 15 minutes later another 10x red. Of course it's possible. But some will never see it in there life.

These just easy examples. It's not about limits ...but we know what the wheel spits out on average. Same with gut...it's made on millions of spins to see what happens. And tadaaa. ... we can exploit it even though the non bet nrs have the same odds of hitting.

[The General]

Unfortunately your beliefs in "limits" are rooted in the gambler's fallacy, and your examples aren't very good.

[RouletteGhost]

Unfortunately your beliefs in "limits" are rooted in the gambler's fallacy, and your examples aren't very good.

You can call it whatever you want

I don't care

I only play with money I can afford. If triggers float my boat, that's how ill play. Noone is in any position to say whether thats right or wrong.

When that ball flies around the wheel and we have money on the table we are in the same boat. I don't care how you play.

[Turner]

OK...I tidied up before it goes tits up.

[RouletteGhost]

Turner ur post was funny. Shouldnt have deleted it

[denzie]

Unfortunately your beliefs in "limits" are rooted in the gambler's fallacy, and your examples aren't very good.

Thx for the advice 

[Turner]

Turner ur post was funny. Shouldnt have deleted it

well...it was upstaged...leave it..its fine.

We had a laugh anyhow

[TurboGenius]

This is why I made the "basics that no one wants to hear" thread.
It's true - no one wants to hear it, believe it - or use it as info when making a successful way to play.
Instead it's "My opinion matters and the math doesn't".

And what do you think of people who have the evidence right in front of them, but still dont get it? Drives you nuts, right?  Actually its more they dont care. Willful ignorance.

"Ignorance" isn't a insult - but it's a good word to explain how some people think.
When you put the value of a 'opinion' over the proven, set-in-stone reality of math (no less)...
then it's just ignorance and that can change over time - but only once someone realizes that their opinion was wrong. Happens wayyyy too often with kids who "think they know everything" and you can tell them all the facts in the world but it won't matter to them - all that you get back is resistance, until at some point in the future they will come and say "You were right".

So - lol....
No past spins
No Triggers
No entry and exit points based on triggers.
No leaving the table or casino to find the grass greener somewhere else.
Just a few - not my opinion - these are facts. Anyone who wants to ignore them is completely free to do so and risk their bankroll on their opinions instead of fact.
And to the 70,80,90 pages on some "method" that is only based on these things - is a complete waste of time to read. People are certainly pros when it comes to taking something simple and making it complex - only to end with the same answer, instead of just listening.
You can say that 2-1=1 in one post - or read 80 pages of
(1+i)*(2-i) = 1*2 + 1*(-i) + i*2 + i*-i = 2-i+2i-i2 = 2-i+2i+1 = 3+i where i = -1
That's your choice. It's your time to waste.

[RouletteGhost]

.

[3Nine]

This is why I made the "basics that no one wants to hear" thread.
It's true - no one wants to hear it, believe it - or use it as info when making a successful way to play.
Instead it's "My opinion matters and the math doesn't".

"Ignorance" isn't a insult - but it's a good word to explain how some people think.
When you put the value of a 'opinion' over the proven, set-in-stone reality of math (no less)...
then it's just ignorance and that can change over time - but only once someone realizes that their opinion was wrong. Happens wayyyy too often with kids who "think they know everything" and you can tell them all the facts in the world but it won't matter to them - all that you get back is resistance, until at some point in the future they will come and say "You were right".

So - lol....
No past spins
No Triggers
No entry and exit points based on triggers.
No leaving the table or casino to find the grass greener somewhere else.
Just a few - not my opinion - these are facts. Anyone who wants to ignore them is completely free to do so and risk their bankroll on their opinions instead of fact.
And to the 70,80,90 pages on some "method" that is only based on these things - is a complete waste of time to read. People are certainly pros when it comes to taking something simple and making it complex - only to end with the same answer, instead of just listening.
You can say that 2-1=1 in one post - or read 80 pages of
(1+i)*(2-i) = 1*2 + 1*(-i) + i*2 + i*-i = 2-i+2i-i2 = 2-i+2i+1 = 3+i where i = -1
That's your choice. It's your time to waste.

Yet, math beats a math game? Please elaborate.  Thanks.

[Steve]

Rg maybe just go make fools of casinos

Ps advantage play is anything that works. That's why it's called that.  Not just vb etc.

[RouletteGhost]

Rg maybe just go make fools of casinos

Ps advantage play is anything that works. That's why it's called that.  Not just vb etc.

I have a sense of humor

Life is not roulette.

I was messin around

[MumboJumbo]

And to the 70,80,90 pages on some "method" that is only based on these things - is a complete waste of time to read. People are certainly pros when it comes to taking something simple and making it complex - only to end with the same answer, instead of just listening.

You said well, what if I tell you that method or system for HG can be only one page long? Will you believe me?