Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?

[RouletteGhost]

Yes

Falkor is a character

He scares me sometimes

He throws around 9-11 like:



Im afraid he wastes a lot of time because not many understand his posts and charts

If he better explained what he was doing then it would not be a waste of time

Unless ots for own self gratification

[Scarface]

Yes

Falkor is a character

He scares me sometimes

He throws around 9-11 like:



Im afraid he wastes a lot of time because not many understand his posts and charts

If he better explained what he was doing then it would not be a waste of time

Unless ots for own self gratification

Here I was thinking am I the only one here that don't understand this stuff. 

Falknor, try to break it down more clearly so we can understand better 

[RouletteGhost]

He is posting charts as if people understand it

Noone does

Maybe he thinks people get it? Maybe for attention?

Explain it more clearly thats why noone responds

[Still]

I doubt Priyanka cares about an immortal legacy from publishing a roulette bible of sorts.  But it does seem Priyanka cares about limiting comprehension to as few as possible by dancing around a few principles. 

My proposal also limits comprehension to as few as possible, but starts with a simple working methodology with enough edge to put some bread in pocket, while wondering how it all works. 

Giving a working method with a slight edge would serve to mask the principles behind the edge. 

This would achieve the same thing: limit comprehension to as few as possible. 

However, i prefer my proposal because it would reward the most sooner than later. 

The other way, no one is rewarded unless they also are struck by the lightning of genius at some point.

And my question is this: Are those who persist until struck by the lightning of genius actually the most deserving of obtaining this knowledge?  Is this really a good way to sort out the righteous from the unrighteous...by giving gratuity only to intellectual Goliaths?  Are grey-matter giants the most deserving of this knowledge?

My proposal would reward potentially the poorest of the poor, sans ego, who persist, immediately, and provide proof of concept.  Once the concept is sufficiently proven, the way opens up for those of more modest intellect (but with a good heart) to persist enough to find the secret of the principles involved.

[MrJ]

Absurdity 

Agreed but......what can ya do? Its the "new" era (play along, lol)

Ken

[The General]

It's another Charles Hamshire like scam.

[falkor2k15]

I doubt Priyanka cares about an immortal legacy from publishing a roulette bible of sorts.  But it does seem Priyanka cares about limiting comprehension to as few as possible by dancing around a few principles. 

My proposal also limits comprehension to as few as possible, but starts with a simple working methodology with enough edge to put some bread in pocket, while wondering how it all works. 

Giving a working method with a slight edge would serve to mask the principles behind the edge. 

This would achieve the same thing: limit comprehension to as few as possible. 

However, i prefer my proposal because it would reward the most sooner than later. 

The other way, no one is rewarded unless they also are struck by the lightning of genius at some point.

And my question is this: Are those who persist until struck by the lightning of genius actually the most deserving of obtaining this knowledge?  Is this really a good way to sort out the righteous from the unrighteous...by giving gratuity only to intellectual Goliaths?  Are grey-matter giants the most deserving of this knowledge?

My proposal would reward potentially the poorest of the poor, sans ego, who persist, immediately, and provide proof of concept.  Once the concept is sufficiently proven, the way opens up for those of more modest intellect (but with a good heart) to persist enough to find the secret of the principles involved.

Watch out for the intelligent and watch out for the poor; they will all deceive you with their own evil ways. The poor are poor because they are lazy like the Greeks. You have to figure out something more difficult, in some respects, than even the Holy Grail: specifically, what kind of person does this - or rather - which kind of person doesn't do this?
"And if you give them what they want, they will sh*it on your carpet in the living room"

Any ideas??

[Turner]

"And if you give them what they want, they will sh*it on your carpet in the living room"

Any ideas??

Rug Doctor!
Its like an industrial carpet cleaner you can hire from most supermarkets.

[nottophammer]

Rug Doctor!
Its like an industrial carpet cleaner you can hire from most supermarkets.

Very good Turner

[DoctorSudoku]

Falkor,
Given all the abuse that Priyanka has received on this forum (and probably elsewhere), why would she write such a book?

If her methods are as good as you depict them to be, she would be better off just applying her methods and strategies making money at casinos in the UK and elsewhere.

[falkor2k15]

Falkor,
Given all the abuse that Priyanka has received on this forum (and probably elsewhere), why would she write such a book?

If her methods are as good as you depict them to be, she would be better off just applying her methods and strategies making money at casinos in the UK and elsewhere.

Like I said: it's a conspiracy theory - currently at the ridicule stage - abuse is inevitable.

With such a book he/she may not be famous now - but would be in many years to come.

Priyanka deserves prestige. Making money is only half the fun. I wouldn't like to see all his/her research go down the drain... preservation is more important.

[Steve]

Like I said: it's a conspiracy theory - currently at the ridicule stage - abuse is inevitable.

Falkor if you really think Priyanka didnt cheat, and its all a "conspiracy theory", then either you didnt read or understand the facts. Or you're incredibly gullible.

[falkor2k15]

Falkor if you really think Priyanka didnt cheat, and its all a "conspiracy theory", then either you didnt read or understand the facts. Or you're incredibly gullible.

It's possible that she did cheat, but can still beat the game without cheating? According to my calculations I've already gained mathematical edge based on Priyanka's teachings - though I haven't actually tested yet. I just want to see if I can gain more edge first and try to understand the game better. Priyanka has progressed my understanding more than any other member contribution to this forum (or elsewhere). It's just the retracking/dispersion killing and personal permanence parts that baffle me. Dispersion is meant to follow us around from table to table - even if we take a half hour break - so I'm wondering if edge/advantage also follows us around? Don't you find Roulette to be a bit spooky? 

Another good quote from Priyanka:
"0 and 0/00 are the biggest problems. Now lets assume that they are removed. Can someone give me a winning method? No. It might win, it might lose, if we play a random game. So even without 0, we are having a problem at hand."
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17014.15

The conspiracy theory isn't that she cheated - that's down to interpretation - the conspiracy fact here is that Priyanka can beat BV it seems and possibly American Roulette too!

[Steve]

It's possible that she did cheat, but can still beat the game without cheating?

Yes you can beat the game. But read the facts about the case. Perhaps you are not understanding them. I'm talking about things like the server logs. Those arent hearsay or mere opinion. They are very clear facts.

According to my calculations I've already gained mathematical edge based on Priyanka's teachings - though I haven't actually tested yet

Two contradictory statements. On another thread I explained at least one mistake in his (HIS) teachings. Again me saying its a mistake is not my opinion.

Anyway I just dont want you or anyone to be misled about what happened with the game. It is not for my gratification or anything. It is I dont like to sit by and see people chasing their tails.

[falkor2k15]

Steve, have you got the raw log for us to analyse?

How do you explain all the efforts Priyanka has put into the Random Thoughts topics? Do you suspect she is testing with a biased simulator that had a bug in it causing her to win big; she then followed up on BV and happened to get lucky on that too whilst recording the video? Could that be why she came here to explain the principles behind her victories? Or do you suspect something more sinister in terms of cheating and rehearsing her winning BV videos; or could she just be outright delusional but good as a hacker?