Multi-line, Multi-pattern System

[GLC]

This is the best multi-line, EC method I have tried so far.  And, believe me.  I've tried a lot of them.

I call it the multi-pattern system because it takes advantage of streaking patterns.

This system takes advantage of streaks of the three most common patterns.

The patterns are: RRRRRRRRRRRRR or RBRBRBRBRBRBRB or RRBBRRBBRRBBRRBB.

I use a mechanical bet selection process that determines the next bet based on the previous spins.

My 1st line has a foundation based on playing for chops.  A chop is RBRBRB or alternating.

My basic bet is for a color change.  So if I see R I bet for B and visa versa.

There are some exceptions to this basic rule.  If I get 3 of the same color in a row, I bet for that color to continue until there's a change of color.

For example:  RBRBBB at this point I bet for B to continue until a R shows up.  As soon as a R shows, I start betting for chops.

Another exception is if I get and isolated BBRR I bet for the doublets to continue. Isolated means BRRBB.  (BBBRR this doesn't qualify.) 

In this case I would bet for BBRRBB for as long as they continue.

As soon as the sequence is broken, I go back to betting for chops.

My second line of bets is the opposite of this in that my foundation is betting for color streaks.

For example:  RRR I bet for R to continue until a B shows, and then I bet for B to continue.

There are two exceptions to this selection system also.

The 1st exception is if I get RBR or BRB I bet for the chops to continue.  As soon as they break, I begin betting for streaks.

The 2nd exception is the same as for my 1st line regarding BBRRBBRR.  After BBRR I bet for the doublets to continue.

As soon as they break, I go back to betting for color streaks.

The advantage this method has over the others I've tried like my post ROL vs BEH, is that you're not always betting against yourself.

In the other line methods if 1 side is streaking and winning, the other side is streaking and losing.

With this system, you only bet opposite colors until one of the 3 basic patterns begins and then both lines jump on the band wagon.

This helps keep the bet size lower and on streaks of more than 4, both sides are winning and not canceling each other out.

With what testing I have done, it is showing itself to be as profitable as some of the 3, 4, or 6 line systems but with much smaller bet sizes.  And much easier to determine how much and where to bet.

If any of you are interested, some help testing will be much appreciated.

Even 1 or 2 30 spin tests to get a feel for it would be good.

It can be played on any of the EC's or if you're really good, all 3 at the same time.

Almost any bet system will work. D'Alembert, 2 up 2 down, pluscoup, leveller, bread winner. 

I wouldn't try the martingale unless you use a limited marty, say 4 or 5 steps at the most.

I know there's a lot going on now, but when you get time, help me out.

My last session was:

160 spins
+126 units
Highest bet was 6 units
Largest drawdown was -2 units 498/500
Largest drawdown in a single attack was -19

Now I know this is a good session and not all will be comparable.  That's why we need to test and see what it's Achilles heel is.

Thanks for any interest,

George

[GLC]

I am going to post a short session so you can see how to play.

R/B  C    S    Total
R
R     -1   +1     0
B     +2   -1    +1   Reset
R     +1   -2    -1
B     +1   +3   +3   Reset  I bet 3  and won on Streak because of the RBR before it.
R     +1   +1   +2   Reset  Betting chops on both sides.
R     -1    -1    -2    
R     -2    +2   -2
R     +3   +1   +2   Reset  When both lines are betting the same it adds up.
R     +1   +1   +2   Reset
R     +1   +1   +2   Reset   Actual spins, no cooked books here.
R     +1   +1   +2   Reset   This is the power of this method.
R     +1   +1   +2   Reset   Oh my gosh.  How long is this streak going to go on.
0     -1    -1    -2    Finally, some bad luck.
R     +2   +2   +2   Reset, No so bad after all.  Ignore zero's, except for the loss.
R     +1   +1   +2   Reset
B     -1    -1    -2
R     +2   -2    -2
R     -1    +3   0
B     +2   -2    0
R     +1   -3    -2
R     -1    -4    -7    These 2 & 1 patterns kill the streak side.
R     -1    +5   -3
R     +2   +4   +3

This is the basic way I play.

It should go without saying that you always bet differentially when your sequence calls for a bet on both colors at the same time, in case a zero hits.

I use the spin before zero to determine my bet when zero spins.  It's really just add 1 to each and bet the same way since the zero didn't change the pattern.

This is 1 up, 1 down bet progression.

The BBRBBRBBR pattern will drive the streak side larger and larger.  

That's one of the Achilles heels for sure.

If you have any questions, I'll answer as soon as I read them.

Cheers,

George  

[GLC]

I'm sorry but I notice that sometimes when I use 'R' for Red when it goes from design to post it changes to "are" and when you read it, it doesn't make much sense.

Victor, can you help me out here.

Thanks

[GLC]

Hey, I just figured out how to get the smiley's in my posts.

I just had a session on Betvoyager, single zero wheel.

57 spins
+20 units
Highest drawdown 14  486/500
Largest bet was 10 units

Felt like a pretty hard fought battle, but the results were actually quite acceptable.

One important factor I failed to mention is that you only bet enough to give you a new high.

Example:  Let's say you are at -3 on your running total and your next bet is 4 on Red and 6 on Red.  Instead of betting 10 on Red, you only bet 2 on Red and 2 on Red.  If Red spins, you will be up by +1.  This helps to keep your bets lower.

If you are betting on both Black and Red, the difference for the above example can't be more than 4.

Example:  If you are suppose to bet 9 on Black and 3 on Red, you would only bet 7 on Black and 3 on Red.  Differentially, you would bet 4 on Black.  If Black wins, you will be +1.

Anytime a win will give you more than +2 units above previous high, reduce bets so you only win 1 or 2 units.

This will reduce the size of some of your wins, but it will also reduce the size of your bets.

As the wise sage has reminded us numerous times, "Play to not lose (or was it break even?) and the wins will take care of themselves.

Plus 20 feels like a good win target, but remember, if things are going well, don't cut yourself short.

On the other hand if things are going badly, take a lesser win or small loss and come back another day.

Cheers

PS.  Hey, now that I know how to use smiley's, I need a bigger selection to choose from.

[Twisteruk]

Hey, I just figured out how to get the smiley's in my posts


HA HA !

Nice one George 

I can already see ure not gonna overuse them lol 

[GLC]

Almost any bet system will work. D'Alembert, 2 up 2 down, pluscoup, leveller, bread winner.   I change my mind re: this statement.

2 up 2 down and bread winner don't work well with this system.

The 5 step marty works just fine when playing on a la partage game or better yet, no zero.

I've been having excellent results with the 5 step marty.

If I lose at 1-2-4-8-16, I recover with 2-4-8-16-32.

I have changed my mind about the bet selection sequence.

Instead of changing from chops to streaks after 3 in a row of a color, I wait for 4 in a row.

Instead of changing from streaks to chops after RBR or BRB, I wait for RBRB or BRBR.

This mitigates the effect of RRBRRBRRBRRB which comes up way too often for my liking.


George