The VdW Matrix: can we profit in 81 spins?

[falkor2k15]

About unfair payout odds: that's only one side of the coin. The other side is probability. So for EC:
1) You get paid 1:1
2) You have 50% chance (notwithstanding house edge)

You can't change (1), but you can change (2).

Using Non-Random you can induce dependency between events, which can then lead to bias. So it's possible to push that 50% up to 51%, 52%, or even 60%, when the opportunity arises, based on the established dependency. But with Non-Random I stumbled across something even more remarkable...

A quote by celescliff: " It's starts off as a slow game with small wins and small losses and then boom, out of nowhere, she makes 1-5 high wins before she quits for the day."

Did you know that in some Non-Random situations we have not 60% chance, or even 99% chance - but 100% certainty that something will happen next event? For example, let's say we usually expect a dozen to appear 33% of the time as an independent event. Well, with Non-Random we have ways of frequently arriving at a situation where, say, 2 dozens have to show next 100% of the time and the 3rd dozen has a 0% chance of showing; you get into a situation where one event gets locked out. That's when you bet your house.

[MrJ]

Just find a mechanical system that works most of the time and when you do lose you are still ahead

They exist

"Most of the time". I agree with you on that RG.

Some people, if it doesn't win everyday, they have no interest in it, damn odd.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

"Most of the time". I agree with you on that RG.

Some people, if it doesn't win everyday, they have no interest in it, damn odd.

Ken

theres a LOT of methods that win most of the time

and with discipline stopping on a loss, will yield you ahead at the end of the week

those methods are attacked by those that "know better"

grassroots was and still is a decent method....not blind betting, but betting against the roulette wheel spitting out the same fixed pattern every 3 spins.

most days are winners....

just because the math of the method does not beat the house edge (none do unless it is AP) does not mean it is a stupid way to play. thats just the opinion of people

again are we playing to make a living or to make a little profit here and there? or for fun?

i have a 5 DS (30 number) method that I have been testing...wouldnt dare post it...i dont need criticism, i need to do me

[Turner]

2) You have 50% chance (notwithstanding house edge)

You can't change (1), but you can change (2).

secretly, when no one is looking, put some chewing gum in the zero