0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

ignatus

  • 3000+ Posts Member !!!
  • 4592
  • Rated: +156
Well now, this is a 18 numbers bet, played with splits, in a progressive bet. It's too early to say anything definite yet, although i won 8/10 from the first test, this luck can quickly change,(more testing is needed!) I know from earlier experience...

Procedure: For each new DOZEN hit, bet 3 splits within that doz; --bet the 2 unhit splits within the Doublestreet hit, AND the 1 split within the unhit split of the columnstreet hit.

When 1 doz (3 splits are bet) no progression, when 2 doz are bet (6 splits) +1u bet for each loss, (when hit within the 2 doz bet) when 3 doz are bet, double bets once,(and keep the same bet in progressionline from the 2 doz bet) then double bets for each loss, until hit.

Bankroll needed: 100u playing with 1u bets..

Played with 1u bets, (wingoal +100, stoploss -100u)

8/10 Games won

*

denzie

  • 2000+ posts MEMBER!!
  • *****
  • 2166
  • Never try , Never know
  • Rated: +52
Just like bomb it will drop and boooom. Common ignatus. ...... you keep sturing in the same pot.  ::)   :'(
EC's ? Dozens? Naaaah. BET THE NUMBERS THAT HIT ABOVE AVERAGE! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !  Forget my old topics. I've moved on. And so should we all do. Don't stay stuck in the same methods that didn't work and never will......

*

ignatus

  • 3000+ Posts Member !!!
  • 4592
  • Rated: +156
16/20 Games won And that's a 80% winrate..

*

ignatus

  • 3000+ Posts Member !!!
  • 4592
  • Rated: +156
Just like bomb it will drop and boooom. Common ignatus. ...... you keep sturing in the same pot.  ::)   :'(

Yes, that may be so, but random tells me otherwise. I love to prove you wrong Denize. You can be "lucky" for 10 sessions, but you can't be "lucky" for 20 session, that's a fact, according to my experience... So a 80% winrate seems to be a pretty fair stats for this one.

*

ignatus

  • 3000+ Posts Member !!!
  • 4592
  • Rated: +156
24/30 Games won yet another 8/10,..Total winrate 80% and that's the final stats for this one.

*

celescliff

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 213
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +17
Yes, that may be so, but random tells me otherwise. I love to prove you wrong Denize. You can be "lucky" for 10 sessions, but you can't be "lucky" for 20 session, that's a fact, according to my experience... So a 80% winrate seems to be a pretty fair stats for this one.


The problem is that you are stuck in the same limbo as you have been from day 1.

For example: You have over 2000 methods now,  and 1500 of those use a negative progression. Shouldnt your experience tell you that a negative progression simply dont work?

Some people can gain experience and some of them move forward with what they learned from methods they created. Unfortunatly you're not one of them.

If you want to gain experience,  read what people that have more experience than you are saying and with your creativity build methods based on that.

Its frustrating to see you share methods that shows that you never move forward.

Get out of the limbo and start learning.

*

ignatus

  • 3000+ Posts Member !!!
  • 4592
  • Rated: +156
For example: You have over 2000 methods now,  and 1500 of those use a negative progression. Shouldnt your experience tell you that a negative progression simply dont work?

Some people can gain experience and some of them move forward with what they learned from methods they created. Unfortunatly you're not one of them.

If you want to gain experience,  read what people that have more experience than you are saying and with your creativity build methods based on that.

I don't care what the "roulette experts" say and that they don't like progression. What i care for is a decent winrate, even the roulette-expert can show me a system that has a 80% winrate? Every system loses, nothing can win 100%... That's the nature of roulette. A flatbetting system can take a very long time to play,.. this one is easy to play, wingoal is reached quickly. Winrate is good. It's a decent method imo.

*

ignatus

  • 3000+ Posts Member !!!
  • 4592
  • Rated: +156
I made a video (from a request)...i had problems with my old videorecorder, so i had to get a new one


*

NextYear

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 715
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +14
I like this one, thanks!

*

ignatus

  • 3000+ Posts Member !!!
  • 4592
  • Rated: +156

*

celescliff

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 213
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +17
I don't care what the "roulette experts" say and that they don't like progression. What i care for is a decent winrate, even the roulette-expert can show me a system that has a 80% winrate? Every system loses, nothing can win 100%... That's the nature of roulette. A flatbetting system can take a very long time to play,.. this one is easy to play, wingoal is reached quickly. Winrate is good. It's a decent method imo.

Ofcourse they can, they just dont want to show them to the public. I myself had over 500 sessions with a method that had 100% winrate until it started to loose. Claming that your test of 30 small sessions have 80% winrate is false. You need to test alot more before you can make a conclusion.

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 3130
  • RouletteForum.cc Owner
  • Rated: +142
I don't care what the "roulette experts" say and that they don't like progression. What i care for is a decent winrate, even the roulette-expert can show me a system that has a 80% winrate? Every system loses, nothing can win 100%... That's the nature of roulette. A flatbetting system can take a very long time to play,.. this one is easy to play, wingoal is reached quickly. Winrate is good. It's a decent method imo.

i get what youre saying but you need to understand when the bet selection has random accuracy, all thats left is progression.

Now heres the key point..... if every system has random bet selection, then every system is no better than any other. So whats left is different progression.

Whats the difference in progression?  How aggresive it is. It could be a +1 unit after losses, or double up after every loss. You can also just stake 5% of your balance.

What progression is better? Well it depends on what numbers have spun. Some progessions like betting only a percentage of bankroll will sustain you longer, because you lose more slowly.

It comes down to this fact too..... the larger you bet, the more you risk. You can either get lucky on a spin and win big, or get unlucky and lose big.

This is really important stuff to understand. Because many people are looking at progressions and systems as a way to at least win in their lifetime. But that approach all comes down to LUCK. Different spins gives different results.

*

denzie

  • 2000+ posts MEMBER!!
  • *****
  • 2166
  • Never try , Never know
  • Rated: +52


The problem is that you are stuck in the same limbo as you have been from day 1.

For example: You have over 2000 methods now,  and 1500 of those use a negative progression. Shouldnt your experience tell you that a negative progression simply dont work?

Some people can gain experience and some of them move forward with what they learned from methods they created. Unfortunatly you're not one of them.

If you want to gain experience,  read what people that have more experience than you are saying and with your creativity build methods based on that.

Its frustrating to see you share methods that shows that you never move forward.

Get out of the limbo and start learning.

100% accurate   :thumbsup:
EC's ? Dozens? Naaaah. BET THE NUMBERS THAT HIT ABOVE AVERAGE! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !  Forget my old topics. I've moved on. And so should we all do. Don't stay stuck in the same methods that didn't work and never will......

*

denzie

  • 2000+ posts MEMBER!!
  • *****
  • 2166
  • Never try , Never know
  • Rated: +52
Claming that your test of 30 small sessions have 80% winrate is false. You need to test alot more before you can make a conclusion.

Spot on
EC's ? Dozens? Naaaah. BET THE NUMBERS THAT HIT ABOVE AVERAGE! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !  Forget my old topics. I've moved on. And so should we all do. Don't stay stuck in the same methods that didn't work and never will......

 

Popular pages: