Ignatuis

[mogul397]

Have I done this before?

Well, I have no chip on my shoulder or argument.  It's just to point out again,
that Ignatius method results always look the same. What I mean by that is
they all climb slowly up, with large bankroll requirements (that I've seen),
and have these random large negative spikes.

We all get that.

Are they playable? Not sure.  Cause it gets to be a bit of a background hummmm, and
doesn't draw much attention to test or work out bugs.

Ignatius, there must be a slower more focused way to present some of these.

[RouletteGhost]

Ignatus has been doing what he does for years

leave it be lol

he has some good ideas....most not playabale at live wheel because noone sits for hundreds of spins

that being said you can use his ideas and win a few units and move on

[thelaw]

Ignatus has been doing what he does for years

leave it be lol

he has some good ideas....most not playabale at live wheel because noone sits for hundreds of spins

that being said you can use his ideas and win a few units and move on

Agreed.

Ignatus likes to create methods/bet selection for fun, but that's usually where it ends for him.

Having said that, if you view it as ongoing research, then you can start to see patterns in all of his methods that are highly valuable outside of the methods themselves.

My only criticism is that he shouldn't delete threads when an idea fails.........leave it there for everyone to see......warts and all!!!

[Scarface]

Have I done this before?

Well, I have no chip on my shoulder or argument.  It's just to point out again,
that Ignatius method results always look the same. What I mean by that is
they all climb slowly up, with large bankroll requirements (that I've seen),
and have these random large negative spikes.

We all get that.

Are they playable? Not sure.  Cause it gets to be a bit of a background hummmm, and
doesn't draw much attention to test or work out bugs.

Ignatius, there must be a slower more focused way to present some of these.

I'm wondering myself if his methods are playable.  Most here look at his system and see 1 loosing session and disregard the whole system.  But Ignatus doesn't play one long never ending session.  He plays stop loss, and when the win or loss is reached he starts over with a new session.

Maybe this is the way to go...I don't know.  Many of his sessions win 8 or 9 times out of ten.  So, looking at it that way, it's winning long term.

I came up with a similar progressive style system that looked promising.  But testing it over 1000 spins continuously, it lost.  However, I played the same system to 200 spins with a stop loss and it did pretty well.  I actually tested 32 sessions for 200 spins and it won 27 times and lost only 4!  This was a big winner over 6000 spins!  Now if I would have played it continuously for 6000 spins I'm pretty sure it wold have lost big time.

Could it be that Ignatus has been showing us the way all along?  All his systems are based on a progression and around 100 spins.  For the most part, variance will occur 1 or 3 ways:  with you, against you, of fairly flat.  Progression can overcome a slight varance pretty easy.  So, when variance is so strong against your bet, that's what the stop loss is there for.   Maybe variance strong enough to overcome a progression is something that happens around 10% of the time...which explains why he can achieve 9 out of 10 wins.

[Scarface]

Ignatus, maybe you can take one of your most promising systems and focus on that, and test it further.  If it wins 8 out of 10, why not see what it does over 20, 50, or 100 sessions.  See if it still has the same win rate

[RouletteGhost]

Agree there.

Lots of 8 out of 10 wins

If he did 50 sessions and won 40 then we may have something. 80 out of 100 etc

[Proofreaders2000]

...they all climb slowly up, with large bankroll requirements...
and have these random large negative spikes.-Mogul397

If Ignatus/board members can figure out the condition(s) in which
the large negative spikes occur (to avoid) we'd have the Grail imo.