• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

If you have a winning strategy, this proposal is for you.

Started by ozon, Apr 23, 04:00 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The General



Attempting to "read randomness" is like looking for patterns in the clouds, and both are just as useless when playing roulette.

I've got a dollar that says that RouletteGhost's system can handily beat Gizmo's.

Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

gizmotron2

Thanks for the endorsement Snowman. I can always use a disparaging comment from you. If you don't like it then it for sure has a chance.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

junscissorhands

Don't be so naive.

SWEET

Hi Ozon,
Here a very simple strategy you may test ...that I learned from a member....(with permission)


Double dozen bet.
The progression=1u for 100spins, 2 for next 100, 4 u for next 100spins, stop at profit.

When last =dz1, bet dz1&2,
When last =dz2, bet dz2&3,
When last=dz3, bet dz3&1,
When zero hit, disregard, and take previous last as indicator.

Virtual bet till negative -20u in first 50spins, then bet with the said progression, till 300th spin...or profit.
Cut loss at -20u.

RouletteGhost

Seeet, thanks for sharing a method

It’s a relief

Everyone wants to goto PM or pretend they have something but won’t share it (we know they are lying)

Thanks!
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

gizmotron2

Quote from: The General on Aug 12, 06:53 PM 2018
Attempting to "read randomness" is like looking for patterns in the clouds, and both are just as useless when playing roulette.

I've got a dollar that says that RouletteGhost's system can handily beat Gizmo's.

I just got done with another two and one half hour training session with student #1. It's starting to get to a point that standard deviation won't allow it to recover to the expectation of a session ratio of 2.33 to 1. He starts each day now by doing 10 sessions in front of me while we also discuss what the statistics of what he is doing means in terms of ratios. While he is doing that I wrote a sim that just blindly bets on Red only on the single zero wheel. After 100,000 sessions run it determined that with the zero the win loss ratio for sessions won or lost was 1.8 to 1. I took the zero out and ran it again. This time it came out at 2.33 to 1.

That is the exact number my method needs to break even. Now my method includes the zero and it needs to balance at 2.33 to 1 in order to break even. But the House edge comes out to 1.8 to 1 in power testing the large number value. So in reality, my method must beat 1.8 to 1 to prove it's better than the statistical large number average.

Today student #1 had 9 wins and 1 loss today. So now the testing is up to 52 wins and 10 losses for a session's lost or won ratio of 5.2 to 1. Now this is not some mechanical system testing. The student is running real challenges to beat randomness by reading it and guessing. There is no prediction being used either.

You guys will have to grasp onto the last possible explanation here and that is that it's a wild lucky streak. So start pilling on about how this is just a small sample and that it proves nothing. I can wipe out everything with this knowledge. I can make you skeptics eat crow. But my plan is to get a small army around the world to make that happen. I don't want anything from them either. They are free to go get what they can for as long as they can and keep it all for themselves. This is certainly better than what Ed Thorp did to Blackjack. He was a total blabbermouth. Let's hear it Dr., General, Xander, Snowman, Caleb, etc...
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

-