• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Aceft bet

Started by 6th-sense, May 03, 01:22 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

6th-sense

Going to throw this out there regardless most people know this transforms to 13223 but what does this mean..before any says it doesn't exist it was said the bet was made in dozens and columns...I've done some testing and have come up with the theory that it's or seems to be a parlay bet played on both dozens and columns i.e. You constantly bet on dozen 1 and in column 1 and if hit then parlay winnings on next stage in the run and so forth..if a miss just start bettin again from scratch...now I don't know if it's any different in reality to betting on any other random 5 combinations of dozens columns etc but it holds up... you may not get that excact combo for hundreds of spins in a row but you also not be losing hundreds of units either as when parlayed you are missing a lot of units put down ...but you are not chasing random but waiting for random to confirm to this pattern...I think this could be used in ds streets etc maths I think says it could work becouse of units saved by parlaying the winnings missing a lot of spins out I've gone through 6000 spins so far and up over 2000 units even though the dozen combo side never hit in a thousand spins ...I think it's worth thinking about so just sharing this idea so please naysayers etc just think about this logically it's 242 units won on a hit from 1 unit parlayed in a hit in the combo in a 1000 spins you would expect at least 300 if the 1st choice then parlayed...that's 600 spins and that's without the parlay going alll the way up the 5 selected bets..yes we get the 1st bet dozen or column repeating but regardless we also have a lot if the times going up that parlay selection even if it doesn't win..so just sit back and think about the logic...sometimes it hits that combo 2. ..3...4.. and more in that 1000 spins so think about the units win against the units placed and parlayed ...thoughts

RouletteGhost

Sorry can you please explain it better

Thanks
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

6th-sense

thought it was self explanatory .....the sequence i gave seems to repeat more than others ...maybe any sequence can work but this seems solid...ive asked falkor to rx it but its too long and boring for him but if a hg was to be made i think it would work on parlay bets ...flat bet and played on casinos money..you will win without progression.. random will conform to any pattern you so desire...its that pattern that would repeat the most...in your eyes ...that you seem fit...this pattern is constant...take grassroots ..a..b..c or the combinations...would that make profit parlaying?....take betting against 10 reds in a row anyone knows this is old school but how many people bust on betting against it? been a late reply but its the way forward

DoctorSudoku

Breaking it into chunks of text (i.e. paragraphs) would certainly help us comprehend it better.
What is the fastest way of destroying your bankroll at the casino?

Play roulette with GLC's progressions.

-