Hangman

[ignatus]

Here is the video-demo 

[6th-sense]

I didn’t think you were betting on the same splits in the same double streets like you did on split 26/29. And split 27/30 I was playing for 5 unique splits in the ds in the column ? I wouldn’t have played split 27/30 as it’s in the same ds ? But it’s working great the way I’m going

[ignatus]

I didn’t think you were betting on the same splits in the same double streets like you did on split 26/29. And split 27/30 I was playing for 5 unique splits in the ds in the column ? I wouldn’t have played split 27/30 as it’s in the same ds ? But it’s working great the way I’m going

Alright, but it has nothing to do with the Doublestreets, it has to do with the columnstreets

as i tried to explain;

A "columnStreet" is for an example 1-10, or 15-24...IF number 10 hits you bet split 7/10. with in that columnstreet 1-10... If number 18 hits you bet split 15/18....and so on BUT you only bet 1 Split within each columnstreet..

[6th-sense]

LOl got you..have to change the way I bet..still seems to work but I could have been lucky I’ll do it properly tomorrow thanks for clarifying I was betting for an individual split in each double street in the column and not betting any other split in that ds no wonder it was taking so long but worked

[ignatus]

Continuing the test session....

As you can see in this chart i lost the progressionline 9 Times, BUT STILL i recovered and reached a new high! 

[valvo]

Hi Ignat,

Can you explain what you mean by only bet "only bet 1 Split within each columnstreet..?

If I get a 6 then a 9 I would only bet the 6 and 3, Is this the correct meaning?

[valvo]

Also are the numbers you are testing on Roulette Extreme downloaded from casino or using there RNG ?

[ignatus]

Hi Ignat,

Can you explain what you mean by only bet "only bet 1 Split within each columnstreet..?

If I get a 6 then a 9 I would only bet the 6 and 3, Is this the correct meaning?

Hi valvo 
Yes, that's right. if 6 hits, you bet split 3/6. Then if nine (split 9/12) hit (no bet) because columnstreet 3-12 is already bet!

All testings have been done with real live-spins, yes.
cheers

[jerome26b]

Hi Ignatus,

promising system but i don't understand your progression, after betting 5 base unit it becomes negative

base bet  total delta

1  17
1  15
1  12
1  8
2  16
2  6
3  9
4  7
5  0
6  -12
7  -29

Jérôme

[ignatus]

Hi Ignatus,

promising system but i don't understand your progression, after betting 5 base unit it becomes negative

I've tried another progression now, meant to be played with 1u bets (or minimal stakes) on RNG, and with a 750-1000u BR it may work? idk  only did one test so far, Highest step in the fibonacci-ladder was 21u.....

10 numbers fibonacci

1 1 1|2 2 2|3 3 3|5 5 5|8 8 8|13 13 13|21 21 21|34 34 34|55 55 55|89 89 89

Go back one step in the ladder OR Re-start at same the level ((when hit)) for the next bet/trigger,

Until reached a new high- Then reset

This must be further explained, When start a new bet (at any step) let's say first step; then you bet 1+1+1+1+1 splits THEN when 5 splits are bet you begin anew on the next level; 2 2 2, (if that's lost) you go 3 3 3 etc, until hit....Let's say you get a hit on the third level (3u) THEN you could choose to go back one level (2u) OR stay at the same level (3) Let's say you go back one level OK then you start again 2 2 2 2 2 splits bet THEN when 5 splits are bet, you go to the next higher level 3 3 3, then 5 5 5...and so on....

[ignatus]

OR ELSE, you could -FLATBET-   

(First test played with 25u bets, with random spins in RX)

[ignatus]

First Live-session Flatbet. (played with 5u bets)

This is how you play flatbet ; -bet every columstreet-trigger 1+1+1+1+1 Splits bet. WHEN 5 splits bet/lost, (or when win) Restart bet/procedure with the single current split hit.

[willtherock]

What about

Bet - Number each bet - net profit
1-5: $1 = 17, 15, 12, 8, 3
6: $2 = 11
7: $3 = 14
8: $4 = 12
9:$5 = 5
10: $7 = 6
11: $10 = 10
12: $14 =12
13: $19 =7

$1 units = bankroll of $335. I wonder what the odds are on 5 splits 13 times. Have to be pretty good?

[ignatus]

What about

Bet - Number each bet - net profit
1-5: $1 = 17, 15, 12, 8, 3
6: $2 = 11
7: $3 = 14
8: $4 = 12
9:$5 = 5
10: $7 = 6
11: $10 = 10
12: $14 =12
13: $19 =7

$1 units = bankroll of $335. I wonder what the odds are on 5 splits 13 times. Have to be pretty good?

Yes, that's a great idea! Thanks 

Problem for me, Is that i can only play with 1u bets= 1 SEK (minimum stakes) on RNG, Every Live-table has a minimum stake of 5u, but for a 1 dollar=8 SEK (Swedish krona)

That would mean, for me, minmum BR, with this system 335*8= 2680 SEK (And for me, that's ALOT of money)
or else if you calculate with my swedish Live-casino minimum stake 5 SEK that would be 5*335= 1675 SEK (that is also still Alot of money for me)... :S

But if you are rich and can afford it ok, not for poor players like me...

so, the only option then left, for me is to play this with minimum stakes on RNG. 335 SEK THAT i could afford!

and if anyone knows of a Honest, decent RNG-casino, you could tell me, ? thx

[ignatus]

You could also use an ordinary 10 numbers negative progression, that would be more cost effective;

2+3+4+5+7+10+14+19 = 64 (yours)

2+2+3+4+6+8+11+16 = 52 (ordinary 10 numbers negative)