• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Long and Short Range Wheel predictor

Started by ignatus, Oct 08, 06:13 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ignatus

Long and Short Range Wheel predictor

Short range= 8 pockets away +neighbours (or less)
Long range= 14 pockets away +neighbours (or more)

2x5 Sectors bet (on each side cw & ccw)
==============================================

This is something i noticed  most hits either come within this "Long" or "short" range,

But i need help with this, to find a TRIGGER??  :question:

I'm thinking, perhaps wait for 3 short range hits, then bet for long range for the next 3 spins OR wait for a switch between short/long range and bet for that particular new range hit to continue for the next spin??

Any ideas are welcome??

Thanks




If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

I imagine the Bet would be somthing like this.... (did a compromise with the low-bet)........Still the bet will still be a 50/50-trigger,(High/Low-trigger) so..This is just an idea,......? IS This workable or shall i throw it in the trash? (i tried and failed with my triggers), i need some help here....pls

...the question is still about the TRIGGER??

:question:
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Proofreaders2000

I noticed with EC's the opposite will hit
after one side hits three consecutive times

R,R,R,B
O,O,O,E
H,H,H,L

Perhaps that could be applied here?  :)

Proofreaders2000

You could start with the long range start of
session, then three short range, repeat steps.

ignatus

Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Oct 08, 10:36 PM 2017
You could start with the long range start of
session, then three short range, repeat steps.

Thanks proof,

But what im tryin, that SEEMS to work i call "dealers signature trigger" Cool name huh?  ;D

This is my idea, ranges long and short, (seem to repeat alot), and then;

Trigger (After a series of short/ or long range hits, when the opposite range hit, bet that it will continue for ONE spin)

..HHL (then bet L, for the next 1 spin)
..LLH (then bet H, for the next 1 spin)

Test 1 & 2 (played with 5u bets)
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

sorry for bothering you,  :-X i thought this was a clever idea , predicting the next spin in some way,..but it turned out to be a pure guessing game, or worse,...

all my triggers failed (including proofs triggers)

either the bet must be changed (or a VERY good trigger must be found)- i doubt it will ever be found with this kind of bet, BECAUSE it's pure random, and i thought i could predict random in any way, but a 50/50 bet (or worse) is very hard to predict....
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

kingmaq

Quote from: ignatus on Oct 09, 02:50 AM 2017
sorry for bothering you,  :-X i thought this was a clever idea , predicting the next spin in some way,..but it turned out to be a pure guessing game, or worse,...

all my triggers failed (including proofs triggers)

either the bet must be changed (or a VERY good trigger must be found)- i doubt it will ever be found with this kind of bet, BECAUSE it's pure random, and i thought i could predict random in any way, but a 50/50 bet (or worse) is very hard to predict....


On Roulette there is no way of getting away from the 2.7% HA because the events are all independent outcomes (probability)

In order to be successful you have to overcome much bigger obstacles, like the variance. Winning or losing is not about the house edge. The house edge is the entry fee, the rent of the store. You can not avoid paying rent, but the rent is NOT what makes stores make money or going bankrupt.

Jun

I don't agree, there are certain short-term random patterns you can take advantage of reducing the HE to almost 0.0

But math guys or Ap'ers will ofcourse disagree.

ego

ignatus i have a book who describe this method in detail with the name wheel signature - i also have rrsys wheel signature system
i regard the methods using pocket counts with some physics involved like dealers release number or you could count distance from outcome to outcome

i have a Huxley wheel and could make some spins - but i also notice that the spins you download for different casinos using roulette extreme make a line sign after each dealer change (if you look at the txt file) then you only need to take every second outcome and you have cw or ccw direction seperated from each other

i can i share the rrsys system with you and write about the other at this topic - just send me a PM if you would like to get deeper into discussion about this method - note this offer is only for ignatus so to others don't waste you time sending me message to get rrsys system

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


Ignatus here is one solution using several short distances into a larger sector - see attach file ...
This method i attach would work with distance cw and ccw ...


Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ignatus

Quote from: ego on Oct 11, 11:42 AM 2017
Ignatus here is one solution using several short distances into a larger sector - see attach file ...
This method i attach would work with distance cw and ccw ...

Thx :)
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

-