How to improve my strategy

[Kattila]

Since you havent changed any odds the answer is yes. And its not an opinion, its a fact.

I play pattern somewhat myself, but I never play against them since playing against an event will make you bet to many numbers. Ive made simulations of this in the past and the odds dont change a bit.

Ccliff
I  don t play against patterns exception  one method, most of the times I play  to catch one position ( position/distance  between same group of numbers), and  I do use similar triggers/patterns like in the other post. If you want to simulate one of my systems I can send you, in real play  wins more than lose so far, in long run....don t know.

[sentinel3]

I got edge playing 2 dozen bets, I tested many combinations of EC and one dozen bets, the positive result was only with this bet selection plaiyng flat.
I  want learn  something  new .  Maybe  I  dont  see something very valueable,  what  can change little  edge.

I  dont  think  that  negative  progression can change edge in 2 dozen  bets . Mayby Im wrong. Its  very  risky.

If I play 2 dozens. I wait for the ball to hit a dozen 4 consecutive times then go against it. Most wins come on the 5th spin.

[celescliff]

If you want to simulate one of my systems I can send you, in real play  wins more than lose so far, in long run....don t know.

If you had asked me that a month ago I would gladly have helped you, but I got my second child a month ago so the little time I can sqweeze infront of the computer I want to focus on me.

I'm sure someone else here that has more time than me can help you out. Sorry.

[ozon]

Today's topic about house edge reminded me of my tests with that bet selection
  Which is able to defeat the wheel without a zero
We always play a trend, always playing the last two dozen.
Unfortunately, I did not learn anything special to share this knowledge. I thought that someone would be able to invent something, even if he did not share it.
Playing something more than EC bets on wheel with zero is meaningless, so if you have any interesting options, I'd love to listen to them

[ozon]

A little more combinations.
This time we will choose baccarat, house edge is small and we do not have zero.
We only play Player
After 2 loses wait for virtual win.
MM 4 step positive progression.
10
22
49
110

The whole option is how we must achieve the minimum edge increase resulting from the bet selection.
If in some way our edge gently increases and we use this positive progress on the table with la partage rule, we will be able to do something that is theoretically impossible.

[ozon]

I have a question of a strange nature.
I do not believe in hitnrun.
But the situation is puzzling me when, each time we reset our result.
  If every time we reset the result, our situation in order to achieve 10 times in a row of a given EC result is greater than our waiting stream of 10 results in an independent.

My question follows why?

[ozon]

My question concerns strategies that give a positive profit at the beginning of the charts.
A part of profits gives us the beginning of the game, but with the posture we start to lose, and
My question is why the mathematical law decides about it

[ozon]

I see that on this forum, everyone has got in the ass of making sure that something works.
If someone with In RX programming skills, will be interested in tests, contact me.

Here I have transformed the old code and obtained such results, they are a non-zero wheel, on the wheel with zero the results are negative, but I have a few ideas that can reduce the house edge almost to zero, unfortunately I do not have the ability to program them

[Winner]

I see that on this forum, everyone has got in the ass of making sure that something works.
If someone with In RX programming skills, will be interested in tests, contact me.

Here I have transformed the old code and obtained such results, they are a non-zero wheel, on the wheel with zero the results are negative, but I have a few ideas that can reduce the house edge almost to zero, unfortunately I do not have the ability to program them

Nice results is thus still 2 dozen method?
And are you the same ozon from bet selection forum?

[ozon]

Yes, I use only one nickname.On another forum is me.
  This is not 2 dozen bet, I use a smaller sector based on streets.
But the assumptions for using the trend are the same.
I still have two concepts that can improve the results of this strategy, these are not opinions but hard facts confirmed by hundreds of thousands of simulation spins.
I still do not know if they are overwhelmed  HE, but it's worth trying

[Winner]

Yes, I use only one nickname.On another forum is me.
  This is not 2 dozen bet, I use a smaller sector based on streets.
But the assumptions for using the trend are the same.
I still have two concepts that can improve the results of this strategy, these are not opinions but hard facts confirmed by hundreds of thousands of simulation spins.
I still do not know if they are overwhelmed  HE, but it's worth trying

I followed you on there on the subject How to get an edge flat betting (in theory) I like the way you think

[ozon]

Winner
Exactly one concept that increases players edge, over the casino is tested in that topic, I had simulations of a few hundred thousand spins with no zero spins and always had an advantage of about 0.60% over the house.

[nichedelico]

Hi Ozon! And you think you can have this advatage with a 0 wheel too?

Nico

[Winner]

Winner
Exactly one concept that increases players edge, over the casino is tested in that topic, I had simulations of a few hundred thousand spins with no zero spins and always had an advantage of about 0.60% over the house.

Fantastic 👍🏼
Only if we can do this with a zero wheels you have the ultimate killer .

[ozon]

In general, I have another concept that uses insidebets and also gives an advantage over HE.
That's why I need a good RX programmer that combines all this into one.
And then it will turn out if it is good to win with HE.
I am very skeptical, I think it will be very difficult to break this boundary.