How to improve my strategy

[ozon]

I am very skeptical about the possibility of breaking the barrier of HE.
But sometimes I try to improve any concepts that showed a positive edge on the wheel without a zero.
I will describe here how I obtained such charts and I will try to combine concepts and extract the best.

In this post, I turned a positive result playing always the last 5 streets with positive progression 1-2-4-8

[ozon]

The second concept that came to me all the time was the graphs from the beginning of this topic.
I've done a lot of positive results playing flat bet on no zero wheel by choosing the last two dozen or hottest dozens.

The next step was to limit the selection, I was wondering how to limit the selection to fewer numbers.
after thinking, I came to the conclusion that if the last 2 dozens give edge it will be the same with columns.
I decided to combine it.
We always play only the numbers that belong to the last two dozen and the last 2 columns, which limits us from the 24 numbers we played before until the 16 we play now.

[ozon]

In the   first concept I notice playing 5  streets, that it is the  optimal number of numbers , because only  they gave  such results with  positive progression , 15  number
In secound concept we have 16 numbers which gives us very close to the optimum.
What I noticed was the selection of 16 numbers based on 2 last dozens and 2 last columns is very streaky, we have a lot of loses, but also wins what works perfectly with limited 4 step positive progression.

For now I did not have to do the simulation in RX.
I did manual tests on R sim   , but  dont  trust  them  , too positive for  me

[Blood Angel]

I am very skeptical about the possibility of breaking the barrier of HE.
But sometimes I try to improve any concepts that showed a positive edge on the wheel without a zero.
I will describe here how I obtained such charts and I will try to combine concepts and extract the best.

In this post, I turned a positive result playing always the last 5 streets with positive progression 1-2-4-8

Thank you for actually describing what it is that you are doing!

[ozon]

I had some time and modified some strategy.
The results were really good, but the tests are on RS which makes them very unreliable.
The strategy consists of waiting, triggers and erroneous beliefs.

Strategy.
We start the sessions, wait 11 spins, record of streets, if we have 6 unhit streets at spin 11, we play unhit streets for 3 spins, stop after win or take loss.
We create EC bets with better conditions.
Alot of empty sessions without triggers, but the results looked really good, in very few cases, we have more than 6 streets, then we add spins so that there are only 6 streets.

[Anastasius]

Last 5 streets goes from 200k spins winning into losing just from zero number?

I played well in real wheel long time with last 2 double streets sound similar

[ozon]

Yes, zero is the biggest enemy.
Especially when you use positive progression, just a negative edge is reinforced by larger stakes.

[The General]

Yes, zero is the biggest enemy.
Especially when you use positive progression, just a negative edge is reinforced by larger stakes.

You're biggest enemy is the house edge.  And it exits on every number, not just the zeros.

[nottophammer]

And wobbly wheels if you can find one

[ozon]

General.
I was talking about the same thing, one number too much.
One number too much = -2.7% = house edge

[ozon]

Rather, I would focus on this strategy, which I added today and test it proprely.

[ozon]

What MM would you suggest when we are able to reduce variance for EC bets.
By this I mean that bet selection behaves mildly, there is a bad series, but usually they are less drastic than when playing static bet selection.
In long run playing flat there will probably be no difference because HE will do his job.
But by using some negative MM, we may be able to get an advantage.
What would your advice be?