Latest discussion on repeaters(GF)

[iar000]

DSAA could answer this 

What is DSAA....

[nottophammer]

An idiot on gambling forum follow him and you'll be doomed

[Roulettebeater]

Problem sorted out, casino rejected  to cashout the whole sum at once, then they suggested to request three withdrawals each up to 350k

First withdrawal approved

[Gitano]

Hi All Gamblers,

I don't know if this my idea has been already talk
but I would ask you what do you think about bet only first 10 spins, begin every new 10 spins.
Betting until a hit in the first "Notto checkpoint 1 " .
Example:  31 win at 7º spin)..Taking new 10 spins it's good to see that range of ten spins win a lot of times..

1º ->31
2º->19
3º->14
4º->29
5º->8
6º->1
7º->31
8º->33
9º->27
10º->21

I Could wait for a 10 loser strike and start to bet  flat the next 10..

Thanks
Bye bye Gitano

[Gitano]

from spin 11

Hi Notto,
Why not from spin 2 ?

I bet 1,2
if I loose I bet 1,2,3
if I loose I will bet 1,2,3,4 and so on until  spin 9 or 10.
Reset all and start again from spin 11º looking like the 1º and repeat the procedure. 1,2, 1,2,3- 1,2,3,4 ...
Your checkpoints show 8/10.. 9/10 a lot

To increase accuracy I will wait 10/10 and next (in 20º to 30º) probably I will have 9/10... do you think ?

 

[Steve]

You really need to move on, what you talking about are basics and every professional player know them.

Really? Firstly, if someone is a "professional", they already know it. There aren't many professionals here unfortunately. I'm not having a dig. It's just the truth. So when someone says their system is something like "wait for 3 consecutive misses on the first dozen, then bet on the first dozen with a progression", they dont need to learn basics?

Plz explain a 5 repeater in 37 spin on the basis of ur rigid math 1/37. I said rigid math.

I already have, many times.

The odds of each spin are 1 in 37. So for ANY sequence of 5 spins, the odds are:

(1/37)^5 = 1 in 69,343,957
This includes a sequence like 1,2,3,4,5 or 32,15,19,22,0

The odds of a repeater need to be calculated based on the past few spins. For example, if we have seen 4 spins (with all unique numbers and no repeats), and want to know the odds of the next spin being a repeater, it is 4/37.

The math is really basic.

Players that dont understand it say things like "there MUST be repeaters".

Well yeah, statistically it's probable. Because the more spins you see, the more unique numbers will appear, and the greater the chances of a repeat.

Knowing this is USELESS. It's like saying "if we have spins like RRRRRRRR..... eventually red is gonna spin." Well duh. It doesn't help.

The difference between my simplistic example and repeaters is that repeaters are only marginally more complicated, but much more difficult for some players to get their heads around. But it's still all the same basic stuff.

You say people already know the basics. But they clearly don't.

[Steve]

I should add that although I studied applied physics at RMIT, I comparatively suck at math (I quit my course because it was as boring as cat shit, and wasnt teaching anything outside books). Perhaps I dont suck at it compared to the average player though. It's just that the math and concepts are really simple, yet still not being understood.

[Steve]

I'm guessing that...
This guy is single.
Wouldn't know what a vagina or breast felt like, even if it slapped him in the face (I can give vivid descriptions).
Has a Vitamin D deficiency.

Yet still loves life.

We can learn a lot from this man. Great share. 

[Steve]

You got me distracted. I have work to do. You did this.

I'm concerned about the viability of this study. The subjects appear to be HAND-picked, rather than random.

I would commission a new study myself, but missed my window. Too old now. Results may not be as desired.

[Taotie]

While we're at it...

[Steve]

Holy crap.
These come to mind...

1. If you smoke a pipe, there's a limit.
2. Do. Not. Have. Sex. With. Relatives.
3. What the fu....?
4. Cross Finland off your list. Avoid.
5. Smoking a pipe is not necessarily as bad as eating it.

[Taotie]

....all of the above. 

[ati]

The odds of each spin are 1 in 37.

Steve, I know you've been arguing about this for at least a decade. Everyone knows the spins are independent and the odds of next spin never changes. But I'm curious, do you accept that even though spins are independent, groups of numbers or events like repeats have some kind of connection and dependency?

[Steve]

Steve, I know you've been arguing about this for at least a decade.

I wouldnt call it arguing. More like trying to help.

do you accept that even though spins are independent, groups of numbers or events like repeats have some kind of connection and dependency?

No. Theres absolutely no connection. Thats the point. What people are perceiving as a connection is something very different.

You dont need to be an expert to understand this point. In educated groups, it is mundane everyday knowledge. But on forums, its a point of disagreement.

[Taotie]

While we're at it...

Hey, you do all realise he's got a whole box full?   

A box full of repeaters, scary stuff.