Can Parachuting help?

[falkor2k15]

This is SICK!  Already seems like it can't lose... And the dynamic level 4 always seems to recover in a very short time... invincible with only 4 levels?



Death came in a flash of blows! 

[falkor2k15]

MAJOR breakthrough - I believe the grail has been found with only 3 parachute levels!!! 

This is all you need:


Further deep thinking and problem solving has led to this new radical view of parachuting! I will try to explain how I got to this new understanding...

[falkor2k15]

OK, so when I was playing the last strategy, I noticed it let slip the HCL2s quite early on - a short-lived event target indeed in terms of the greater scheme of things. I then played without missing out any DCL2s or LCL2s - but this needed some "interruption bets" in-between (or instead of) normal parachute level bets.

Re-evaluating the streams dependency as part of a hedge bet:
HCL2 <> DCL2 <> LCL2

--If the LCL2 hits then we win the game at a new high.
--If the HCL2 or DCL2 win then if we don't win at a new high we at least get reduced losses (can be adjusted for break even)

It then occurred to me that we need to start from the left-side first and try to exhaust the HCL2s (stream 1) as higher priority over streams 2+. Rather than trying to cover DCL2 and LCL2 at the same time with interruption bets - too much to deal with - we should indirectly bet them in support of recovering the HCL2s first and foremost. And should we be unlucky and let slip some DCL2s or LCL2s then we can use that to influence our decision on whether to abort the current game or to continue and decide how far to parachute beyond the HCL2s.

The other revelation I had: by drawing on a selection of parachute levels catered to EC stream 1 we end up omitting several stream 2-only (dozen) based parachute levels, but perhaps through reduced losses during the stitched, hedged & parlayed levels we could maybe "jump back" (if the BR recovered enough) to a previous unused DCL2-based parachute level - since we would have moved on from EC HCL2s as the primary focus. You could look at this as like a "hidden level" upgrade, hence we still get to use most CL2-based parachute levels even though we don't start off with them.

However, this betting plan had hardly got off the ground when I noticed how solid the first 3 EC parachute levels perform in terms of break even, free re-attempts, and perfectly utilizing the other streams in the right order. There is something magical about this. It has already made 1K without ever failing to recover. This is serious - with previously untapped extremes!

This has to be the most powerful system I have ever seen... I'll put up some screen captures to demonstrate the absolute power! Manz ain't ready for this... you get me? 

[falkor2k15]

Here's a level 3 with 3 x break evens followed by a win and recovery:


Here's a level 1 with 5 x break evens followed by a win and recovery:

This means that the concept of the Holy Grail is simply being able to, say, bet for a 50% EC with the option of breaking even instead of losing - so that we can always recover a losing session.

[Tinsoldiers]

Care to explain in plain English and easy to follow steps, eh?

[RouletteGhost]

this has been falkors thing since the beginning

post things people do not understand

he will never explain when you ask him to

he is a very very bad forum member

[falkor2k15]

Care to explain in plain English and easy to follow steps, eh?

There's only 3 levels, and all bets (hedged) are in the 2 screen captures above - totally transparent. It couldn't be more simple. The 4th level was set to be an isolated bet on High or Low, but in the end it wasn't even needed:

[RouletteGhost]

you are naive in assuming people can decode your chart

the time it takes you to make the chart you can explain it in a quarter of the time

this is why you are seen as a scammer

[falkor2k15]

you are naive in assuming people can decode your chart

the time it takes you to make the chart you can explain it in a quarter of the time

this is why you are seen as a scammer

You just have to read the topic. Let me know if you get stuck or if there's something you don't understand or I never explained properly. This system is much more simple than I envisaged in terms of being a winner. There's no complex money management or rules. We now need to follow up and try to understand why recovery is guaranteed. You can see in the 2nd screenshot that there was 5 EC equivalents (HCL1 losers) in a row with a maximum of 6 units wagered. If this was Martingale then it would have been:
1 - lose
2 - lose
4 - lose
8 - lose
16 - lose
32 - win

6 vs. 32 = Holy Grail!

[Steve]

Falkor your explanations are quite unclear, or more overly complex. You put a lot of work into your posts, but you really need to simplify things and put it into plain language. Remember people are lazy and short on time, and dont want to sort though lots of information.

[falkor2k15]

Falkor your explanations are quite unclear, or more overly complex. You put a lot of work into your posts, but you really need to simplify things and put it into plain language. Remember people are lazy and short on time, and dont want to sort though lots of information.

I tried my best by being over-explicit, and it's not fair that RG has come in right at the end of the topic demanding a simple explanation. This whole topic has been a long journey with daily despair. It's only right that RG starts from the beginning and quotes anything in particular that doesn't sound clear; in other words, some effort is needed on the part of the reader IMO starting from page 1. However, if I get time I will try to write an article that summarises the highlights from all previous pages on top of all the re-iterations I've already made, as it's been very exciting for me. Again, it's up to the students in the class to ask questions about bits they don't understand - not the teacher to simply broadcast everything over the air waves and expect everyone to understand instantly.

[Bigbroben]

Falkor,
The type of charts and bets you share are probably something anyone can understand if they just concentrate reading from page 1, which I haven,'t done yet.
When I do take the time to dive into the topic, I'll just print the msny pages and write notes as the reading goes.  So much easier to read paper and concentrate than reading on a screen
Will for sure comment once it's read.

Hang on!

[Steve]

Again, it's up to the students in the class to ask questions about bits they don't understand - not the teacher to simply broadcast everything over the air waves and expect everyone to understand instantly.

You put a lot of time into sharing things, but again keep in mind simple and clear is better than long and complicated. Nobody can force you to make things simple and clear, but you're just going to annoy people if you make things long and complicated. And they are much less likely to pay attention.

If you want people's attention, which you obviously do because you're posting, you need to consider their position too. If you have the attitude "its up to them to read, complicated or not", thats fine but you have to accept most people wont bother.

[falkor2k15]

Steve, it's not intentional. As I said I've tried my best to make it clear in my own explicit way with many reiterations - but that doesn't mean others are going to magically "get it" without making some effort to read something. The fact that he hasn't quoted anything or said "I understand that bit, but I don't get what that bit is" shows that he's not even providing constructive criticism. He's simply insulting the entire topic without having read a thing. How easy is that? To go to any topic, not read it, and say "I don't understand anything!"? Would an audio book make any difference I wonder...? To be honest, I think we are dealing more with trolling here than someone who genuinely can't understand a word I am saying. So that then comes to the next dilemma... why defend trolls? Do you sense emotional wounds in RG that might be similar to your own?

[junscissorhands]

To be honest, RG has never really been the sharpest knife in the drawer.

But the utter nonsense of the DaVinci code being put up by Falkor is unacceptable either. Why don't you post all this junk on your own website and forum (with only two active members) you and Atlantis.

I'm sure those two members appreciate this HG of yours