Trapper Lines

[ignatus]

Look at 2 Last hit DOZENs, -Now you bet the 2 UnHit Lines within those 2 Last Dozens hit. Also bet 1u on the last Unhit Dozen(This is a Hedge bet, just re-bet if hit). (3u bet in total).

Progression (any you like) I use a simple doubleup after Each loss,

TEST1. RNG, 5u bets.

From my experience this is a "LOW RISK" gameplay, because? Even if you  would have a couple of losses Drawdowns would not be so great etc,...

[Let Me Win]

Why are you allowed to post this boring repetitive B.S every single day?

[nottophammer]

Why are you allowed to post this boring repetitive B.S every single day?

LMW; nothing wrong with him posting his ideas, but Steve should give him his own section. Then you would not have to look at them.

[Let Me Win]

Yes, that would be a good idea.

What disturbs me most of all is that the minus first rule of physics is that information is never lost.

Thus this daily nonsense from IGNATUS is going to eventually end up in a black hole 🕳 and remain there forever.   

[sturrock]

You keep on posting Ignatius. You are one of the main reasons I come to this forum.
If you had a system that could win a million bucks a year you would get some dick complaining that it does not win 2 million a year. 
I have not seen these idiots come up with anything better than you post
Keep up the good work!!!!

[Gitano]

Right,
I want a main topic with all the Ignatus threads!!
Thanks Ignatus for all the ideas u give to the community.

[Let Me Win]

Sturrock, if you have not seen anyone post ideas better than IGNATUS then you can't have been looking very far.

I have methods developed from reading deep ideas shared on this forum over the years by quality over quantity posters.

You are defending the indefensible.

I am a system player I don't use AP methods of any kind nor do I use computers other than for tracking methods.

So my fight is not against system players let's be clear about that.

But progression and triggers are both mathematically proven fallacies.

If you can't accept that is a fact you really are a moron and can't be helped.

[Let Me Win]

It's utter bollocks.

A hedge bet?

OMG why you want to hedge on a negative expectation?

This is the best ideas you have read on here?

[Let Me Win]

Tomorrow there will be another system called "FcukMe1" which will be based along the lines of....

Wait for something to happen then bet something then if lose do the same again but increase the stake next bet.

And so on and so on and so on day after day week after week year after year decade after decade and yet still you will actively support it and encourage more more more.

Finally I understood by encountering people like you at this forum how it was possible for Kim Kardashian to become a multi millionaire and attract millions of followers....

I also understood why dementia rates are increasing again thanks to you.

[sturrock]

So I'm a moron?  You have the Holy Grail, do you? You make millions from roulette, do you?
You never lose?, do you?
Get a life !!!! lol

[sturrock]

Let Me Win........ YOU HAVE PISSED ME OFF NOW. MY MOTHER DIED OF DEMENTIA  after a 10-year battle which caused my Dad to lose everything including his house just to get care for her. THIS IS NOW PERSONAL ARSE HOLE

[Robbert]

Settle down...

Just relax.

[sturrock]

I quite agree with Robbert. At the end of the day, it is all a bit of fun. People take this far too seriously. No more from me

[Joe]

I am a system player I don't use AP methods of any kind nor do I use computers other than for tracking methods.

So my fight is not against system players let's be clear about that.

But progression and triggers are both mathematically proven fallacies.

Well I thought progressions and triggers were the essence of systems. All systems have elements of one or the other, or both. Correct me if I'm wrong? I'm neither defending nor attacking systems, just saying.

I can't see any way of creating a system which doesn't involve some kind of fallacy.

[Let Me Win]

We can play a system/method using flat betting so no progression.

We can use our own personal fallacy or in my case collection of fallacies for our bet selection safe in the knowledge that all bet selections are created equal so our fallacy selections are perfectly valid.