• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

B-V system with minor tweak

Started by GLC, Nov 26, 06:25 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GLC

This is a system for even money bets and you can play roulette, craps or baccarat with it. 
It also was tested through an year permanences of 4 casinos (50 spins or less per day) and results were:
Casino                                      Year        Net profit in units
Casino-Bad Homburg/Germany 1998        2518
Casino-Baden/Austria                1997        2401
Casino-Bad Wiessee                  1998       2607
Casino-Campione/Switzerland    1998       2478

1. Basics of the system:
The system is based on 2 kind of decisions and they are :
Opposite previous spin
Same as previous spin.

Create 4 columns. 
Col 1 is the spin results.
Col 2  enter Same or the Opposite of the last spin.
Col 3 you enter S or O for all the odd spins, 1-3-5-7-9 etc...
Col 4 you enter S or O for all the even spins, 2-4-6-8 etc...

Track the 1st and 2nd spins.
If the 2nd spin is the same as the 1st spin write an S in Col 2 & 4
If the 2nd spin is the opposite of the 1st spin write an O in Col 2 & 4
If the 3rd spin is the same as the 2nd spin write an S in Col 2 & 3
If the 3rd spin is the opposite of the 2nd spin write an O in Col 2 & 3

When you have 7 spins you will have 6 decisions in col 2, with 3 decisions in cols 3 & 4.
We always check the last 3 decisions in a col to decide how we are going to bet.
We will bet either opposite the last spin or same as the last spin.
In the last 3 decisions, if at least 2 of the decisions were Same, we will bet same as last spin.
If at least 2 of the decisions were Opposite, we will bet opposite the last spin.
We will not bet unless cols 2 and either 3 or 4 agree.

If we are playing an even number spin cols 2 and 4 must agree for either Same or Opposite.
If we are playing an odd number spin cols 2 and 3 must agree for either Same or Opposite.

Letââ,¬â,,¢s say we are betting spin #31, An odd number spin so we will be dealing with cols 2 & 3.
If the last 3 decisions in col 2 are Same, Same, Opposite, we will bet 1 unit that the next spin will be the same color as the last spin.
If the last 3 decisions in col 3 are Same, Opposite, Same, we will bet that the next spin will be the same color as the last spin.
Since Col 2 agrees with col 3, we bet 1 units that the next spin is the same color as the last spin.
Had the last 3 decisions in col 3 been Opposite, Same, Opposite, we will bet  that the next spin will be the opposite color to the last spin.
Since cols 2 and 3 donââ,¬â,,¢t agree, this is a no bet situation.


Letââ,¬â,,¢s say we are betting spin #32, an even number spin so we will be dealing with cols 2 & 4.
If the last 3 spins in col 2 are Same, Same, Opposite, we will bet that the next spin is the same color as #31.
If the last 3 spins in col 4 are Opposite, Same, Same, we will bet that the next spin is the same color as #31.
Since cols 2 & 4 agree, we will bet 1 units that the next spin is the same color as #31.

We compare col 2 with either col 3 or 4 depending on if our next spin is an even or odd number.
They must agree with each other before we can bet.
If 1 shows Same and the other shows Opposite, no bet.
                       
You can now continue the same process.  If you win +20 units or lose ââ,¬â€œ12 units then you stop  play.  You can also only play 50 spins, but all this is up to you.
BANKROLL: 12 units.

This is a brief summary of the B-V system from the 302 systems.
I have tweaked it a little bit, but it is basically the same.
Any questions are welcome.

LOL,

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

I've been analyzing this a little more and it looks like it is trying to find streaks.

Either streaks of the same color such as RRRRRRR or streaks of chops such as RBRBRB.

When things are all over the place, it gives a no bet signal.

It's a lot of work to figure out something that isn't that hard to do by just looking at the recent history.

It's a flat bet on top of that, so I'm a little suspicious of the tests he said were conducted at the 4 casinos.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

I know this has been dormant for a couple of years, but that doesn't mean anything.  It can always be brought back to life if it proves to have some promise.  I've been using this bet selection method and using the Tera TNT bet progression method with pretty good success.  Of course both methods are tweaked just a little bit, but not much.  Nothing spectacular, but it feels like it's picking up trends after they're pretty strong which means we can skip some of the losing bets in the transition phases.

The author claims that the original system was tested at 4 casinos for 1 year of betting 50 spins or less per day.  Assuming that they did 50 spins per day for 365 days and their net wins were around 2500 units for each casino.  That is a win rate of .13 units per spin or 1 unit won for every 7.7 spins.  At 50 spins per hour, that's about 6.5 units per hour.  Not too shabby especially since it's a flat bet system.  The flat bet is really a little misleading because they actually bet 2 units per betting opportunity. 

Oh well.  To be ahead anything after playing 72,000 spins is a pretty strong system.  We have to take the author's word for the results which is always suspect.  I don't know that he was trying to sell the system.  If he wasn't, it would give more credibility to his claims.

Just bringing it to your attention in case anyone's interested.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

TwoCatSam

Thanks, George.

So this is on-going?  That is, once you start you do not have to stop and *ind a new trigger?  You just continue betting as bets are called *or.

Will you try it, George?

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Ralph

The casino numbers should be the same day and different casinos, if we see different dates and places years back, we can suspect they have test until found a good one.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

GLC

Quote from: Ralph on Mar 31, 08:53 AM 2013
The casino numbers should be the same day and different casinos, if we see different dates and places years back, we can suspect they have test until found a good one.

I see your point Ralph.  They were not on not the same day, they were 2 different years as well.  My guess is that at one time he was selling this system and wanted to be able to prove his results somehow.  That time is long past so his numbers have to be taken by faith.  And most of us probably fall the grouping of "Oh ye of little faith".
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

TwoCatSam

Quote from: Ralph on Mar 31, 08:53 AM 2013
The casino numbers should be the same day and different casinos, if we see different dates and places years back, we can suspect they have test until found a good one.

So, true, Ralph.

Those who are con*ident will tell you a day in advance:  Spielbank  Table Three  April 1.

But what do I know!!??  I have no ehp!!

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

TwoCatSam

GLC

That is why we test *or ourselves.

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

GLC

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Mar 31, 07:33 AM 2013
Thanks, George.

So this is on-going?  That is, once you start you do not have to stop and *ind a new trigger?  You just continue betting as bets are called *or.

Will you try it, George?

Sam
Yes Sam.  This is a bet every spin possibility.  We don't bet if the two columns we're checking don't agree.  In other words if the dominant result in column 1 was Same and the dominant result in column 2 was Opposite, that's a no bet situation.  They must both agree.

I have only hand tested this.  Not enough to draw any solid conclusions.  Using the Tera TNT progression method and I haven't gotten into trouble yet.  That means that there have been a fairly balanced win/loss result.  The most I've lost in a row is 5 times.   

Like I said, that's in only a few hundred bets so nothing conclusive.

Yes, I would play this even at this early juncture; for quarters that is.  Not ready to risk any big bucks yet.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

-