what must happen in next 100spins!?

[SWEET]

Streaks of dozen also must hit.
Anyone dares say "streak of 3" of a single dozen wont happen in next 100spins?

By betting,
parlay+1 of single dz for 3in row.

bet1=2+1+1=4
bet4=8+4+1=13
bet13=26+13=39-3=36units.

now the question is,
any  record that
"dozen, streak of 3",
not happen in 100spins?

[mickavelli]

As in Ati's files, streak of 4hit, may not happen in next 100spins,(400spins/1million ) thus we lose
whole br.

And we may encounter 'only ONE streak of 4hit" at the very end of 100bet.

thus need to devise mm to recoup losses if "only one streak of 4hit at the very end"

WE need to know what the count, number, of worst ever hit of "streak-3in-row"... in 100spins

Hey sweet, what's stopping you from being dealt the worst ever streak when you sit down?
Sorry not trying to sound negative but you started this with a non random question and took things to a guessing of when will something happen that is not guaranteed to happen game.
Plus, how come you are so interested in such long playing sessions?
You can calculate the minimum number of hits per partition etc for much shorter sessions and explore other guaranteed structures that make up those worst case scenarios to help in devising a plan

[SWEET]

if dozen streak3hit, did not hit in many 100spins, then we could bet
"dozen streak2hit".

we could see that many
"dz streak2hit",
in 100spins.

simple parlay+1

bet1=2+1+1=4
bet4=8+4=12-2=10units.

thus, bet 1u for next 100spins.
if streak2hit happen...

none=lose-100units.
once=+12-100=-88u losses.
twice=+24-100=-76 losses.
thrice=+36-100=-64 losses.
*
nine=108-100=+8.
thus flat bet parlay needs NINE streak2hit to profit.

the pertinent question is, in dz record, of 100spins increment,
what the least ever count of streak2 hit?

if we could have faith what worst may happen, we could devise a progression mm.

Hope you could help research your files.
Thanks.

[SWEET]

Hey sweet, what's stopping you from being dealt the worst ever streak when you sit down?
Sorry not trying to sound negative but you started this with a non random question and took things to a guessing of when will something happen that is not guaranteed to happen game.
Plus, how come you are so interested in such long playing sessions?
You can calculate the minimum number of hits per partition etc for much shorter sessions and explore other guaranteed structures that make up those worst case scenarios to help in devising a plan

Hey Mickavelli,
I am keen to learn your "partition" , please tell more.

We not try to guess, but rather, try to understand what the worst ever hit, or as known to others as VIRTUAL LIMIT.
it simply mean something MAY NOT HAPPEN BEYOND A TRESHOLD,
say,bm, record worst ever EC is 69hit in 200spins, and rng is only 30 hit in 100 bet.
thus you NEVER see any EC less than 69hit/200 or 30hit/100bet yet till today.
search the net, and read them.

[SWEET]

we not guessing nor predicting.
we know some length MUST hit, because there a RECORD,, and so obvious....and non random too.
we just need to research what the WORST EVER  in the past 300years of casino.
say, EC,
streaks of 3, MUST HIT in next 100spins.
what unknown is what the least ever amount of streak of 3hit in 100.

Streak of 4, may absent in next 100bet, as Ati's files... where four 100 increment in million spins. there simply no "streak of 4hit"

same as dz streaks of2hit,
I dont think there ever a 100 without streak2hit.
it must hit, must happen, just need to know what the least ever recorded so we could build mm around it.

Dozen, streak of 3hit, may absent in next 100. we just need to research for sure

[SWEET]

in EC, 69hit or more Must happen in next 200spins.
30hit or more must hit in next 100spins.

that called VIRTUAL LIMIT...and non random, and must happen
(except in rng when you could corrupt program cheating)

members of other forum claim they could bet to win the,
only 69hit/200spins, and only 30hit/100spins with their own labby progression.
I believe they could,

labby could win, since labby needs only 33%+1 hit to win 1 unit.
But the progression run up to hundreds units per bet...5000u br, which is just impossible for us to bet in casino

[Steve]

There are no limits. Everything is in proportion to amount of spins.

You're looking at completely the wrong thing. Do you want to understand it?

[SWEET]

There are no limits. Everything is in proportion to amount of spins.

You're looking at completely the wrong thing. Do you want to understand it?

Steve,
you're right that PROPORTION to amount of spins.

that proportion will be large and small, namely variance.
The proportion cant become to large or too small...
look back at any history spins record, there never less than 69hit/200bet in any EC bet.
that the lowest proportion,and largest never exceed 131hit/200bet.
that a written record, yet broken, we cant dispute that.
thus if we want to win EC bet, we need to devise mm that can survive the 69/200, or else.

[Steve]

If you're thinking variance is the enemy you must overcome, you're heading the wrong direction.

[SWEET]

Anything that continues three in a row is  nothing. It's so common that it's unremarkable.

Please explain how you intend to exploit triples? That is the real trick you know.

Gizmotron,
Triple is so common, but it is remarkable,
(as I sound like a broken record player) we need to know, what the least possible for triple to hit in 100 spins, Historically...

look at past history bm record, when we know the worst ever, then we can devise mm around the worst ever, and bet fearlessly.

for example, hypothesiscally,say
worst is only EIGHT TRIPLE,
then flatbet parlay+1, can win.

[SWEET]

below a data of dozens.

let see how the streak of dozen 1, happen



Zumma American roulette , dozen one only hit 19/100 .

3
3
2
2
2
3
3
0
2
3
2
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
1
3
2
3
3
3
1
3
3
2
3
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
1
3
2
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
1
2
3
1
1
0
3
1
2
0
2
1
2
3
2
0
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
0
3
3
2
2
0
3
1
0
3
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
0
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
1
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
1
3
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
3
2
3
1
3
1
3
2
2
2
0
1
2
1
2
3
2
3
1
0
2
3
2
3
1
2
0
2
2
1
3
2
2
3
3
2
1
2
1
3
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
1
3
2
0
2
0
3
1
1
3
2
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
3
2
3
3
1
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
1
3
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
1
0
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
3
3
2
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
0
3
1
2
1
3
3
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
3
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
0
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
2
2
1
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
0
1
1
2
3
1
2
3
3
3
3
0
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
3
0
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
0
1
1
2
1
1
3
2
2
3
2
1
3
3
2
2
1
2
0
2
0
3
1
3
1
3
2
1
3
2
3
3
0
3
2
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
3
1
3
3
2
3
3
1
1
1

[SWEET]

We can see that, though dz1 only hit 19 time, it still streaking up to 2,3 and even four.
ok, someone already roll up his eyes, as this just small data!😁.
But the point is, no need to predict or guessing, STREAK3HIT  of dz MUST HAPPEN!
we just dont know, the worst least count amount of streak3hit.
Thus need help from avid members to research!
we see lots of streak2 too, and when a single dz sleepy, the other TWO DOZEN, streaking like crazy!!!
look forward to hear from you guys!

[Kali49]

Hi everyone,

I was wondering if you guys know if it is possible to use artificial intelligence to predict the next number in roulette?

I googled it and I found this article, this guy uses some online AI to play live roulette here is the link to the article:

*** link removed (is dead anyway)

I was looking for an A.I algorithm for a long time, I guess I need to learn how to code.

[Steve]

Sweet, dont you think that has been tried a million times before?

I was wondering if you guys know if it is possible to use artificial intelligence to predict the next number in roulette?

Yes, it's similar to what I did. If done correctly you can find and exploit statistical anomalies of real wheels. The real trick is doing it in a practical amount of spins.

[Kali49]

Gizmotron,
Triple is so common, but it is remarkable,
(as I sound like a broken record player) we need to know, what the least possible for triple to hit in 100 spins, Historically...

look at past history bm record, when we know the worst ever, then we can devise mm around the worst ever, and bet fearlessly.

for example, hypothesiscally,say
worst is only EIGHT TRIPLE,
then flatbet parlay+1, can win.

Is that possible?