what must happen in next 100spins!?

[SWEET]

my half cent.
Ok, we already understand random and
unpredictable randomness, and limit of random.
Now, say ,
What must HAPPEN in next 100spins, guaranteed!?..

In next 100spins....The EC ,dz,dd,ds
streak of same ,(or chop of EC,dz)...

The EC, in next100spins
STREAK OF..

ONE...must happen.!
TWO...must happen.!
THREE ..must happen!
FOUR...must happen!
FIVE....must  happen???
SIX...??
SEVEN...??
EIGHT..??
NINE...??
TEN....??
ELEVEN and more...??

I read a research about this occurrences, somewhere in internet years ago... (unfortunately i cant find it, maybe someone could post a link...or members could do research )

and how we could take advantage to hilt, say, eg. a streak of three that MUST HAPPEN???

[SWEET]

Someone needs to research million spins to see what the least streak of EC, in 100spins increment.
Thus hypothesiscally IF the worst ever streak of EC was, say FIVE in row, then we could devise a strategy to mm for five-in-row, in every 100spins, fearlessly.
First by waiting for certain spins that has no 5in row, then bet the remaining spins for 5 to happen.

[Steve]

Random has the same limit as numbers.

You cant look at a sample of spins and say an event doesn't seem to happen in x amount of spins. It's all in proportion.

All been said before. Listen, or don't.

[SWEET]

Steve,
you dont have believe streak of 2,3,4, or five cant hit in next 100spins?

[Steve]

Sure it can. You need to understand why it's irrelevant.

[ati]

Knowing that something must happen is unfortunately not enough to win. You cannot tell when the event will happen, and you cannot blindly try to predict when it will happen, because the loss that comes from all the failed predictions will wipe out all your winnings or gets you into a hole.

Maybe not the best example, but think about this. Pick a football team, now you can definitely tell that the team will either win or lose two matches in a row in the next say 30 games. Is knowing that it will happen enough for you to profit from it? This is where sport bettors turn to statistics to increase the accuracy of their predictions.
Sure, you could pick the best team in the league, they will very likely win two games in a row, but the return is too small. It's like covering 35 numbers is roulette.

There has been many discussions about statistical imbalances in roulette and how they could help to increase the accuracy of predictions of when certain events that must happen will happen. But it's not very likely that you will find the solution. If there is one.

[SWEET]

Ati,
We dont try to predict what and when streak of x-in-row , will happen.

But it definitely MUST HAPPEN!
Say, eg. streak of TWO...must happen,
streak of THREE ....must happen..

Or ,
dare you say that streak of FOUR may not happen in next 100spins?!
Thats why we need someone to do research, what the worst shortest ever STREAK in 100spins.
If, say, the shortest ever is 4 in 100spins, then we could fearlessly devise a parlay mm to beat it, never to fear the worst from hell negative variance.

[SWEET]

personally, I think,
worst ever maximum streak of EC, is streak of three, meaning that there must at least a three-in-row in next 100spins.
Thus in EC bet, eg. if we bet only player, expect to see at least a three-hit-in-row in 100bet.
What if the 3in-row hit at the very last 97th hand??? you bet P  and lose from 1st to 96th... because 3P in row never materialize then PPP from 97th to 100th???

[SWEET]

of course everyone knows the simple parlay mm of EC in three hits =1,2,4=7u.

thus if the streak of three hit at the 97th, then how we devise a incrementally mm that recoup all the 1st to 96th  losses???
meaning the 100th hit win of 7units, recoup all the first 96 bets losses???

[gizmotron2]

Knowing that something must happen is unfortunately not enough to win. You cannot tell when the event will happen, and you cannot blindly try to predict when it will happen, because the loss that comes from all the failed predictions will wipe out all your winnings or gets you into a hole.

So true. The only thing that you can know is that something is happening while it happens. That in no way tells you what will happen on the next spin. Perhaps you should find out why people are winning using my method, RR.

[SWEET]

another parlay known to all is say, prepare 3u for next 3spins, thus

bet 1u, parlay winning plus 1.
bet 3u, parlay plus 1.
bet7u...=14minus 3=11u.

thus how 11u won, recoup previous first 96bets???

[ati]

I don't think it can help you to create a winning system. But I have tested 10,000 times 100 spins for EC streaks, what statistics do you want to know?

[SWEET]

So true. The only thing that you can know is that something is happening while it happens. That in no way tells you what will happen on the next spin.

Hi Gizmotron,
we cannot, and we do not predict, but we know for sure, that something MUST HAPPEN.

Please relook at our files, any EC bet of red black, player banker or even FTL.
You will noticed that, in every 100bet increment, there will be at least 3hit-in-row in 100bets.
Could anyone here show a bm casino's file that has only 2hit-in -row in 100bet???

Then again, everyone here knows, that
a chop also a strrak
eg.
pbp= three hit in row, if we be chops...
anyone dare say that bpb, or rbr, or hlh, or oeo ....that three in row, may not hit in next 100bet.
It has nothing to do with ecart, variance, voodoo, or PREDICTION.

It simply....must happen...!!!

[SWEET]

I don't think it can help you to create a winning system. But I have tested 10,000 times 100 spins for EC streaks, what statistics do you want to know?

please see what the shortest maximum streak in 100.
(my english no good😂...)
simply mean...see if the longest streak of EC in a particular 100bet...is only 3in-row..(there is no streak of more than 3hit...the longest is only 3 hit, for example)

.and what the worst maximum dozen streaks in 100 too.
thanks in advance.

[ati]

I hope I understand you correctly. So out of 10,000 tests 370 times the maximum streak was 3 in a row.

Please see below on average how many times an EC repeated in a row, within 100 spins. This shows that there is a good chance that a streak of 6 will happen at least once in every 100 spins. But not always!! 2240 times the maximum was 5, so it's unpredictable.

Streak of 3   11.8199
Streak of 4   5.7471
Streak of 5   2.7941
Streak of 6   1.3598
Streak of 7   0.6598
Streak of 8   0.315
Streak of 9   0.1495
Streak of 10   0.0738
Streak of 11   0.033
Streak of 12   0.0166
Streak of 13   0.0076
Streak of 14   0.0031
Streak of 15   0.0011
Streak of 16   0.0004
Streak of 17   0.0003
Streak of 18   0.0002
Streak of 19   0.0002
Streak of 20   0.0001
Streak of 21   0.0001

Sorry I don't have time for dozens now, I'm still at work.