• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

Started by gizmotron2, Jun 02, 09:50 AM 2020

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

precogmiles

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Sep 25, 10:07 AM 2020
I was but I got to thinking that it can't be true that first try attempts can go on a losing streak for 3 months at a time.

So here is a question for you.  Would you like to see me wreck Baccarat, Craps, Roulette, and Blackjack just by taking people here on a very simplified one on one instruction of Reading Randomness? If I do it I mean these games would all be done. It would spread like wild fire. Could you stand watching this happen like a virus? It just means that I could not use it anymore.  I guess you could try ESP on slots.

First prove it then make your grandiose statements.

You seem to like the idea of playing this amazing guru. But when we ask for proof you can't demonstrate it.

To be frank if RR is as good as you claim why not just get to the top 5 In roulette simulator or MPR. That would shut up everyone.

Have you noticed how the critics of precognition have shut up?  Do you know why? Because precognition was used to get me to 1st position of MPR and has got me 1st place of roulette simulator on multiple occasions.

It is simple, less talk and more action. Anyone can claim anything, nobody cares about claims.

People care about facts and winning methods.

gizmotron2

Quote from: precogmiles on Sep 25, 11:05 AM 2020First prove it then make your grandiose statements.

You seem to like the idea of playing this amazing guru. But when we ask for proof you can't demonstrate it.

To be frank if RR is as good as you claim why not just get to the top 5 In roulette simulator or MPR. That would shut up everyone.

Have you noticed how the critics of precognition have shut up?  Do you know why? Because precognition was used to get me to 1st position of MPR and has got me 1st place of roulette simulator on multiple occasions.

It is simple, less talk and more action. Anyone can claim anything, nobody cares about claims.

People care about facts and winning methods.
OK, I'll take that as a yes.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Herby

Quote from: precogmiles on Sep 25, 11:05 AM 2020Have you noticed how the critics of precognition have shut up?
Because you are such a waste of time, you have no clue of math, you are not able  to program.
You left this forum to get a real life, seems you failed as always.
Now you are back, still precoxing.   :xd:

precogmiles

Quote from: Herby on Sep 25, 11:15 AM 2020
Because you are such a waste of time, you have no clue of math, you are not able  to program.
You left this forum to get a real life, seems you failed as always.
Now you are back, still precoxing.   :xd:

This is all that is left of the system junkie losers like this herby troll. All they have are just personal insults.

I am first place on MPR with a Winrate of 1.4 I'll let you do the maths on that.

They can't deal with the fact precognition works, because they have spent the last 10 year's wasting their lives trying to make 1 + 1 = 3. Losers.

precogmiles


Moxy

Quote from: precogmiles on Sep 25, 11:24 AM 2020
This is all that is left of the system junkie losers like this herby troll. All they have are just personal insults.

I am first place on MPR with a Winrate of 1.4 I'll let you do the maths on that.

They can't deal with the fact precognition works, because they have spent the last 10 year's wasting their lives trying to make 1 + 1 = 3. Losers.

Battle of the numbers flubbers?

gizmotron2

Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Moxy

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Sep 25, 12:42 PM 2020
I'm working on that.

Both you guys flub numbers and both you guys don't even play out on the field.   This is hilarious. 

gizmotron2

"My edge is a large enough number of people doing this and producing win to loss results that are demonstrably beyond the possibility of inaccuracy."
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

winforus

Quote from: Moxy on Sep 25, 12:11 PM 2020
Battle of the numbers flubbers?

The difference is day and night.

Precogmiles, gotten first place on MPR and RS, while Gizmo has a losing record on both.

Precogmiles uses flat betting, while Gizmo admitted that he can't win by flat betting and needs to use progression.

There are many other people who have succeeded by using precognition. You can even find some on this forum.

There is 0 people that we know of, that have succeeded with RR.

On top of that, Gizmo is a pathological liar - after all the BS he posted, you can't take anything seriously that comes out of his mouth.

gizmotron2

Quote from: winforus on Sep 26, 06:17 AM 2020On top of that, Gizmo is a pathological liar - after all the BS he posted, you can't take anything seriously that comes out of his mouth.
You are a wise person and everyone should follow you like the Pied Piper.

I figured out what to do about it.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

winforus

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Sep 25, 10:07 AM 2020
So here is a question for you.  Would you like to see me wreck Baccarat, Craps, Roulette, and Blackjack just by taking people here on a very simplified one on one instruction of Reading Randomness? If I do it I mean these games would all be done. It would spread like wild fire. Could you stand watching this happen like a virus? It just means that I could not use it anymore.  I guess you could try ESP on slots.

You have been talking about it for 15 years, and after 15 years you couldn't beat RS nor MPR. And you think that you will wreck all those games all of the sudden? All talk, and nothing to show for it, just like a typical BS charlatan politician.

At this point, it's best if you got some professional help and took time off - you are beyond delusional.

Moxy

Quote from: winforus on Sep 26, 12:40 PM 2020
You have been talking about it for 15 years, and after 15 years you couldn't beat RS nor MPR. And you think that you will wreck all those games all of the sudden? All talk, and nothing to show for it, just like a typical BS charlatan politician.

At this point, it's best if you got some professional help and took time off - you are beyond delusional.

Is Precog afraid of EC?

gizmotron2

Quote from: winforus on Sep 26, 12:40 PM 2020You have been talking about it for 15 years, and after 15 years you couldn't beat RS nor MPR. And you think that you will wreck all those games all of the sudden? All talk, and nothing to show for it, just like a typical BS charlatan politician.

At this point, it's best if you got some professional help and took time off - you are beyond delusional.
Yes I have. But three years ago someone here suggested a video. I watched it and saw something great. I worked on it a little. Got really good at it. Taught it to someone else, waited a year. Then a year ago I wrote about it as an experiment to see if anyone could learn it self taught.  You are always a jerk. Keep up the great job. So I have only been talking about this for a little more than a year.

Now don't hear that. We need you to stay in the mud with 15 years. That way people that listen to you will see you as a dope.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

winforus

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Sep 26, 02:33 PM 2020
Yes I have. But three years ago someone here suggested a video. I watched it and saw something great. I worked on it a little. Got really good at it. Taught it to someone else, waited a year. Then a year ago I wrote about it as an experiment to see if anyone could learn it self taught.  You are always a jerk. Keep up the great job. So I have only been talking about this for a little more than a year.

Now don't hear that. We need you to stay in the mud with 15 years. That way people that listen to you will see you as a dope.

Except that's not how you went about it - once you again you are distorting the truth. You made up excuses and lies, as to why you lost on MPR and RS, and the fact that you taught 30+ people, and turned them all into a winning players.

Question: Did you turn 30+ students of yours into winning players before you saw the video or after?

If stating facts and caring about truth is being a "jerk", then I am happy to be one.

You have positioned yourself as a "guru", or somebody who has been successful at this for many years. You did not present yourself as someone who is testing something out, or somebody who is doing experiments. Your arrogant attitude plus so many lies along the way, is the reason why I should continue to call you out on your BS, until more people catch on.

Whenever I present actual arguments and facts that you can't deny, you write some silly response or go on personal attacks like a little child.

-