0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

winforus

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 276
  • Member
  • Rated: +43
Thank you tool. Why should just the democrats get a kick out of manipulating people.

I am convinced that you have schizophrenia or some other mental disease, just like your idol Trump.

Anyone with a brain, can read your thread, take a look at your games and chart, and easily conclude what I have already said here.

*

gizmotron2

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 902
  • Member
  • Rated: +20
I am convinced that you have schizophrenia or some other mental disease, just like your idol Trump.

Anyone with a brain, can read your thread, take a look at your games and chart, and easily conclude what I have already said here.
That's pretty important for you to be that smart. You are just smart enough to get nothing from my sharing. Thank you for buying into that Spandex Boy Parade. You belong.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

winforus

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 276
  • Member
  • Rated: +43
That's pretty important for you to be that smart. You are just smart enough to get nothing from my sharing. Thank you for buying into that Spandex Boy Parade. You belong.

Facts still remain the same, which you continue to ignore. Your claims of RR being an AP was disproven, given that you couldn’t win on mpr nor on roulette simulator. Your losing results on roulette simulator were very similar to any other progression system, it wins and then crashes.

You can write all the nonsense you want, it won’t change these facts.

If your “reading randomness” is a winning, AP method, then you should be easily able to win and show winning results. Instead you create countless number of excuses.

*

gizmotron2

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 902
  • Member
  • Rated: +20
Facts still remain the same, which you continue to ignore. Your claims of RR being an AP was disproven, given that you couldn’t win on mpr nor on roulette simulator. Your losing results on roulette simulator were very similar to any other progression system, it wins and then crashes.
No it has not been disproved. I did 50 sessions without a loss twice and then fuked the world up just to catch peons like you in the trap. So don't plan on winning this. I already destroyed your impressions. Before I ever shared this last July I already confirmed it all. This is not about comparing dicks.  It's about sharing it in a world of skeptics.  Those that reject it are dogshyt to me. You are nothing but road kill along my way.  Your presence is like that of an idiot expressing his needs ant a Mensa meeting.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 7022
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +512
Gizmo, Exactly what verifiable proof of your claims have you provided? (that your system is the HG/works)

*

gizmotron2

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 902
  • Member
  • Rated: +20
Gizmo, Exactly what verifiable proof of your claims have you provided? (that your system is the HG/works)
Absolutely none. All I did was instruct people that want to learn it. I don't care what the naysayers have concerns about. I just teach and they show results. That's how it's going to be. People will learn this and they will be the truth in the long run. Those that don't want to learn it can do what they do. I don't care.  I proved that I could teach it to another person and that is the only proof that I need.  I'm using human nature. People want to win. There is nothing stopping them and nothing to pay for.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

*

Herby

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 535
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +36
You simply are too stubborn to accept the facts and the truth.

Really ridiculous is your licking and sliming behaviour.
You are not able to reflect yourself but you tell us the truth.

The result is, if there was any truth in your words it's not acceptable from a person with such a poor behaviour you show. (Dry your tears you are not the only one)

Don't TALK about truth, SHOW some.

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 7022
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +512
All I did was instruct people that want to learn it

All I've seen is clues.  I havent seen anything solid people can test. If I'm wrong, exactly what actionable information have you taught people?

Like is there a very clear resource explaining a principle people can test?

precogmiles

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 732
  • Member
  • Rated: +49
Good video, this will again go over peoples heads.

Winforus, you are right. Too many system junkies who have been on these forums for over 10 years still don't understand these basic truths.

I sometimes wonder at the IQ Levels. You have people on other roulette forums who still think progressions are the holy grail. It is pathetic.

Repeaters and progressions do not work!
precognition is real. Good luck!

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 7022
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +512
If people don't want to learn, they won't.

Im looking forward to getting to more advanced stuff instead of grade 3 math.  Again people understand things when its really basic like red/ black. But the logic goes with crap like repeaters.

And it won't all be traditional AP. There will be a lot about suggested new approaches.

winforus

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 276
  • Member
  • Rated: +43
No it has not been disproved. I did 50 sessions without a loss twice and then fuked the world up just to catch peons like you in the trap. So don't plan on winning this. I already destroyed your impressions. Before I ever shared this last July I already confirmed it all. This is not about comparing dicks.  It's about sharing it in a world of skeptics.  Those that reject it are dogshyt to me. You are nothing but road kill along my way.  Your presence is like that of an idiot expressing his needs ant a Mensa meeting.

50 sessions is still short term, you can find other people on there who won 50 sessions, then losing it all.

And no, you didn’t lose on purpose. That is a lie. At first you claimed you were bored, then something else, and then you claimed it was all part of your plan - which is a lie. If you were telling the truth, you wouldn’t need to lie.

Like Steve said, you provided 0 proof that what you preach is AP method - so far you lost both on MPR and Roulette Simulator. You talk the talk, but can’t walk the walk.

winforus

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 276
  • Member
  • Rated: +43
Really ridiculous is your licking and sliming behaviour.
You are not able to reflect yourself but you tell us the truth.

The result is, if there was any truth in your words it's not acceptable from a person with such a poor behaviour you show. (Dry your tears you are not the only one)

Don't TALK about truth, SHOW some.

The truth has been shown to you many times on this forum, the latest video is one of the examples.

If you are not willing to accept the truth and verify it for yourself (you can do the same thing Steve shown in his videos), then that is your problem.

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 7022
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +512
I did 50 sessions without a loss twice

How long is a session? How many spins?

and then fuked the world up just to catch peons like you in the trap

Do you mean then you deliberately lost, just to mess with people?

This is not about comparing dicks.  It's about sharing it in a world of skeptics.

In this industry, skepticism is a good thing.

Exactly what have you shared that can be verified as accurate?

Those that reject it are dogshyt to me

Reject what exactly? Your claims? Please be specific.

 If you mean your claims alone, without verifiable information, why should people believe claims alone?

You are nothing but road kill along my way.  Your presence is like that of an idiot expressing his needs ant a Mensa meeting.

He is rightfully challenging your claims. Speaking like this to him isn't justified.

*

gizmotron2

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 902
  • Member
  • Rated: +20
He is rightfully challenging your claims. Speaking like this to him isn't justified.
I built an entire teaching thread where anyone can go and read it. All the questions get answered there. But people just want to troll and argue without learning the skills. That is like justification these days, that's for sure. I even created a practice software for anyone to use. It's all there. But blanket accusations and wrong conclusions only verify that these people have not spent any time trying to prove it for themselves. They want their hands held and to be spoon fed. They want it proved to them before they will try it. There is a way to do this and it is not to get a rise out of me. So I squish them like bugs. Why be nice to someone that just wants to troll?
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

pepper

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 277
  • Member
  • Rated: +6
Im looking forward to getting to more advanced stuff instead of grade 3 math.
I can't really watch this videos. It's all obvious stuff and the same stuff every mathematical expert will tell you: you cannot beat roulette.

I like to look at the opposite of everything. If people claim the world is round, I like to look at the possibility of it being flat. All conjure against flat earthers like they are sooo stupid, yet they accept the fact that they may not even be real or be where they actually are, like the video precogmiles posted demonstrates. Your reality may not be what it seems.


Share via delicious Share via digg Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via reddit Share via stumble Share via twitter

 

Popular pages:
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2