• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

It works - RNG

Started by slopez007, Aug 23, 01:25 PM 2020

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Herby

Quote from: Joe on Aug 25, 10:42 AM 2020I didn't say that the law of the third doesn't work
Nobody said that you said this above.
Reading, understanding and logic ....

Herby

Quote from: Joe on Aug 24, 10:55 AM 2020the law of the third only 'works' because spins are independent!

The word only is wrong.

Herby

Of course Joe is right with most of what he says, but here is a (very) little logical mistake.

gizmotron2

Quote from: Joe on Aug 25, 10:36 AM 2020Previous numbers and stats can't tell you what the next spin or spins are going to be on their own any more than the map can tell you what it feels like to actually walk up the hill.
I'm glad that we all agree on that point. So to be clear as crystal, past spins have no ability to predict the future.  So to beat Roulette you must use something other than prediction. Math will not predict when a trend will start, how long it will last, and when it will end. So you can't use math to beat Roulette either. So what do you have to work with? There is coincidence and luck. Both of these things exist. They don't use math and they don't use prediction. They do exist.

There are phases of good luck and phases of bad luck. They occur in randomness as coincidence. There is no predictability to them either. But they do have a common characteristic to them. They have time. They have a length to them that can be used against them or for them.  That is the skill of this.

But you mathZombies want it to always be about prediction and how right you are to point out that prediction is impossible. That makes you the donkey. You are a donkey that is stuck up to his eyeballs in mud. I'm glad too. You will be last in line and a day late to the party.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Moxy

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Aug 25, 11:16 AM 2020
I'm glad that we all agree on that point. So to be clear as crystal, past spins have no ability to predict the future.  So to beat Roulette you must use something other than prediction. Math will not predict when a trend will start, how long it will last, and when it will end. So you can't use math to beat Roulette either. So what do you have to work with? There is coincidence and luck. Both of these things exist. They don't use math and they don't use prediction. They do exist.

There are phases of good luck and phases of bad luck. They occur in randomness as coincidence. There is no predictability to them either. But they do have a common characteristic to them. They have time. They have a length to them that can be used against them or for them.  That is the skill of this.

But you mathZombies want it to always be about prediction and how right you are to point out that prediction is impossible. That makes you the donkey. You are a donkey that is stuck up to his eyeballs in mud. I'm glad too. You will be last in line and a day late to the party.

I have you gotten laid yet.  It's on me.

gizmotron2

Quote from: Moxy on Aug 25, 11:47 AM 2020I have you gotten laid yet.  It's on me.
That needs translation.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Herby

Quote from: Moxy on Aug 25, 11:47 AM 2020I have you gotten laid yet.  It's on me.
This kind of trolls makes this board very very unpleasant.

This board is a product of Steve , the quality of this board is a sign of the quality of his other products.

Herby

Sorry, moxy is no that bad,
the name who I meant was something like " precoxman", I forgot, it was not important enough to remember.

Joe

Quote from: Herby on Aug 25, 10:49 AM 2020The word only is wrong.

Herby, try proving the law of the third without assuming spins are independent. It can't be done.  :thumbsup:
Logic. It's always in the way.

Joe

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Aug 25, 11:16 AM 2020Math will not predict when a trend will start, how long it will last, and when it will end. So you can't use math to beat Roulette either.

I'm not trying to. But physics? Yes, that can beat roulette.
Logic. It's always in the way.

Moxy

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Aug 25, 11:50 AM 2020
That needs translation.

It's a good stress reliever.   Vegas is open.   My treat.

Herby

Quote from: Joe on Aug 25, 12:01 PM 2020proving the law of the third
proving was not the question,

the law of the third can be fullfilled if the spins are not independent

Joe

Quote from: Herby on Aug 25, 12:18 PM 2020the law of the third can be fullfilled if the spins are not independent

Prove it.  >:D
Logic. It's always in the way.

MumboJumbo

Newbie players 🤔

cht

Quote from: Joe on Aug 24, 04:16 AM 2020
Instead of betting on the unhit numbers after 37 spins, try betting the same number of numbers picked randomly. You'll find that the results are the same. Why? because outcomes are independent and past spins don't influence future spins.
Here're the 3 sessions where I rolled 37spins for history data then make a 37units(cover zero) even chance bet for every spin for the next 18spins to spin55. The result for each spin is either breakeven=-1, win=+35, loss=-37

Summary

session1   9w       5L        4BE       18bets
session2   6w       4L        8BE       18bets
session3   7w       4L        7BE       18bets
                  41%    24%     35%

54bets, 41%win, 24%loss and 35% breakeven(-1)

Small sample size bets based on historical data.

I provide this sample proof to disagree what you wrote.

-