Discussion about Cut Point Methodology.

[ego]

Here will anyone be free to ask questions.
As I made my statement in the original post so will I not allow any talk about independent trails or gamblers fallacy or the house edge - as I already made does statement and with deal with does that is left at a later stage.


Cut Point thread is here:
link:://rouletteforum.cc/roulette-and-gambling-framework/cut-point-methodology/

[Bayes]

Thanks for post the CPM ego, no roulette forum would be complete without it!  

[ego]

Thanks for post the CPM ego, no roulette forum would be complete without it!  

True and thank you :-)

[Bayes]

One strategy is to try to capture a small quick correction to capture one out of two new states to appear direct after a strong imbalance.

That is why I compare it with betting against or with any bet-selection as for example as series of two and it would make no difference.

I'm assuming you don't REALLY think it makes no difference what bet selection you use, otherwise it's a lot of work you've done for nothing... 

[ego]

I'm assuming you don't REALLY think it makes no difference what bet selection you use, otherwise it's a lot of work you've done for nothing... 

True it is one way to look at it or assume :-)

[VLS]

Thanks for taking the time to post dear Patrik,

Appreciated! 

[albertojonas]

Dear Ego

i am afraid the cpm software has some kind of bug.

it sometimes doesn't show the correct window for 3.0std.

if i put 3.0 it shows windows with 2.5 std

another times the windows of perfect state it shows are not from the selected singels vs series
but the opposite.
odd behaviour.
as anyone else noticed or experienced this? (i am running this on mac os through crossover...)
i would love to have it working. do you have any update?

Cheers,
AL