Spin File

[chrisbis]

Till exhaustion of all the possibilities??

Is that not the maxim of anything requiring testing?

Then again, one could say U test till Ur happy with the results, so in theory, if U started winning fairly early on in the testing period, U could end the tests because the results satisfied that
logic in one's procedure!!

[ophis]

36 000 000 ?

but where to get so many spins....

but all seems pointless when on one set of 200 000 spins system is in profit and on other set it is not....

its all random.

how to determine if system is good. anyone have definition for that?

[ophis]

another thing... if i will get graph of those 700 000 spins flat betting with end profit does it mean it is a grail?

[ego]

how to determine if system is good. anyone have definition for that?

Yes.

Later when I have time I will post about it - for beginners the Van Kellen Test is a good bench mark.

One simpel fact is that no serios testing is made using progressions - but i assume you alredy did know that.

[ophis]

Yes.

Later when I have time I will post about it - for beginners the Van Kellen Test is a good bench mark.

One simple fact is that no serios testing is made using progressions - but I assume you alredy did know that.

That would be great   

[iggiv]

You saying there is no system that can be in profit after 700 000 spins?

maybe that's right. the longer and more frequently u play --more chances to lose.

[Bayes]

for beginners the Van Kellen Test is a good bench mark.

I would be interested to learn about this test, I've never heard of it.

[ego]

I post it tomorrow - it is a simpel bench mark and no public system or system for money has what i know pass the VKT.

And yes you can win and pass 700 000 i did - not so difficult as you would in average get 15 isolated singel events in 500 000 - is just a matter how you deal with money managment.
All in with fibo progression 12 steps or aim for periodic events and divide fibo into different stage of attacks - but at 800 000 it tank with all in method - maybe it would last longer with stages and periodic attacks.

Basics is we dont talk about spins - it is usless if you want something valid you should talk about "placed bets" and not spins and you should not test using a progression when you develop a strategy as you should use flat-betting to get a valid picture of how your method peform.

[ophis]

Basics is we don't talk about spins - it is usless if you want something valid you should talk about "placed bets" and not spins.

Obviously we are not talking about 1 bet per 10 000 spins.

you should not test using a progression when you develop a strategy as you should use flat-betting to get a valid picture of how your method peform.

Very true