VADDIS SOLVED

[alexlaf]

Very nice post person.

[alexlaf]

(Sorry to tell you: that is a completely wrong approach to roulette)
 Why is that wrong Winkel?
I am trying the same thing as person.. How you suggest to approach roulette..?

[winkel]

Not a good reply winkel..if gut worked u should be directing to him to that strategy

That´s the problem with roulette.
Everybody thinks he just needs a good strategy and he will become rich in a few weeks.

I know a book "How to become a millionaire". It´s a bestseller. Guess how many readers became millionaire.

I can give you the name of the book "how to play golf successfully" you won´t win the Augusta-Tournament.

You could buy a racket, but you will not win the "All-England-Championship"

There is much more needed than a good strategy:
You don´t have to be in need of money.
You must afford to lose and to restart with a new bankroll.
You don´t have to have problems, anger, hate, revenge-ideas.

You have to enter a casino in the same mood as you would enter an amusement-park. You know you will spend a lot of money, but you will have had fun.

[6th-sense]

There use to be lots of discussion over the years about this winkel..
Everyone of them totally agree with what you are saying...
Members should read your post above as it's pretty correct

[gianfrancopierino]

bigmoney is laughing at us with this thread, you can give advices,, even contradictory, it wont matter

[Person S]

Clearly this is a psychological reason, i.e. not wanting to lose the bankroll. I read somewhere that a Chinese man lost a billion dollars in stocks, but he still had 3 billion left, which means that he has enough money for his children and grandchildren for many years. But he was so worried about it that he almost shot himself.

[Person S]

But if Winkel says play at your own pleasure, but before that he suggests a chain system capable of winning. What is the point of all this? First claim it is possible, and then admit it won't work. And the example with the books - to become a champion the odds are probably 1/1000.000. A lot of random variables to go all the way. Well we have a 1/37 wheel in front of us and we're still not champions)

[winkel]

But if Winkel says play at your own pleasure, but before that he suggests a chain system capable of winning. What is the point of all this? First claim it is possible, and then admit it won't work.

I knew it from the beginning and you proofed me right.

What did you expect, when you found this forum?

Open a thread.
Find a guy who is spreading his "always winning" System for free.
Gives you the starting bankroll as well.
You don´t have to pay it back.

Calm down boy.

I´ve got some strategies that work for ME!
But do YOU have the abilities to make it work for you?

The only way to win at roulette is: Knowing when to start and knowing when to stop.
Read the reminders at the top of the forum:

Every system has its winning and losing streak. But in the lon run they will fail.

You won´t get it as a present. You have to work for it and learn for years and years.

[Person S]

I agree that there are people who are looking for easy ways to win, and I was like that in the beginning - that's for sure. It was naivety and ignorance of the basics. But then I read a couple of wise people and started researching what they were spreading, I also studied a probability theory textbook on my own trying to get something out of it. It developed my intellect a little bit, yeah.
If you can play the game and win, then my respect to you. I can't do that yet...
The solution you are suggesting for the guy is a straight path into the clutches of a cheat, and there are people on here who have fallen for it.
It's like lust, there's such a poison of the mind in some eastern philosophies. And when the thirst takes over the mind everything - all resources go into quenching it, more often than not unsuccessfully. But that's a little off-topic.
In the end, I am interested in reading some topics, they are useful not only in roulette, but also in life, it's like food for the mind.

[Person S]

Obviously, no one here is going to encourage you, hey come on - it's the right thing to do. It's okay.

[Person S]

And no offence Winkel, it's just that your message sounded like it was a good solid foundation, it was kind of hopeful. But then you went and said it was useless. We start building a house, but then we are told - hey quit your job, go to another place, we start building a house there, and again they say quit your job and go to the next place. As a result, we change, and change, and change places, and there is not a single house, but only pits and unfinished walls. If we are building something, we approach it thoroughly.

[6th-sense]

Winkel didn't say it was useless..

He's telling you that you need to to actually practice and know the shortfalls and physcology of betting with money you havnt got..

That has to be combined into an overall play.he's not being contradictory ..he's telling you experience is the key and he cannot teach that..

His experience becouse he can play it means it works for him..and others who are experienced

[nottophammer]

Been following and best to stay out.
But like Winkle says and you second it 6TH.
When the idiot turns up, tell him GUT works, he'll spout it's been tested and don't work.
He means he can't win with it.
Winkles graph that goes 36;0x down to zero and the others going up to 37, is what Turbo is all about. Repeat.

But you have to practice like Azim said for GUT; same for Turbo.

How do you use Turbo's top 3 or better top 9. He has mentioned or should I say riddled about 9.

Good luck

[winkel]

it's just that your message sounded like it was a good solid foundation, it was kind of hopeful.

let me direct you to a strategy:

see pm

[Person S]

Thank you very much Winkel, I will check it out. 
Yes you need experience, that will be a plus. But as you know, even champions have a way of losing. The only thing that separates them from the beginners is that they don't fall into tilt.

Notto hi, I'm also researching Turbo and watching part 3 and your charts, I've noticed that the repeats are more often from late, as Eugene showed the numbers jumping from last to first place. Although it may not always be the case, but it is frequent. And the 2/3 law is not unimportant either. But I haven't put the puzzle together yet....