2:1 with 50/50

[GLC]

Disclaimer:  I statements made by me regarding how I will act in the future and be dismissed by myself on the slightest whim.

Even though it is still 2010, I am going to publish the final winning system of the year.

Buy-in  100 units.
Stop loss  100 units.
Win target 1,000,000 units.
Progression: 1-1-1-1-1-2-2-2-3-3-4-5-6-7-8-10-12-14-17 = 100
Two part bet.

Bet 1 unit on penultimate dozen.
If win, bet the original unit plus the 2 won on a penultimate even chance.
If win this 2nd bet, start over.  You will be at a new high.
If you lose either of the 2 bets, move 1 step to the right on bet line.

Simple and effective.  No tracking.

Enjoy,

G.

P.S.  If we can improve our selection of a dozen to bet it will make this system much more effective.  Same for the even chance bet.

Triggers, LW's, etc...

[SAKIS]

If win, bet the original unit plus the 2 won on a penultimate even chance.


can you explain that please? you bet color?

[GLC]

If win, bet the original unit plus the 2 won on a penultimate even chance.

can you explain that please? you bet color?

Correct.

You can bet any even chance that you like.
This also works if you bet for the last dozen to repeat and if win, bet for the last color to repeat (or hi/lo, even/odd) suit yourself.

I have been using the following trigger to bet on the dozen.
I wait until I have all three dozens in the last 3 spins and then I bet for the dozen that hit first of the three to hit again.  I bet 3 times for it to hit.

If I don't win, I wait until three unique dozens hit again and then bet the 1st one to hit on the 4th, 5th, or 6th spins.  If I lose here, I wait for another trigger.

Example:  dozen 3 hits, then dozen 1 hits, then dozen 2 hits.
That's all three unique dozens, so the 1st dozen to hit was the 3rd dozen.  I bet for the 3rd dozen to hit next.  I give myself 3 chances for it to hit.  If it doesn't hit in 3 spins, I stop betting on it; wait for a new trigger and continue moving 1 step to the right on my line with each loss.

Clearer than mud, I hope.

[chrisbis]

George My friend George.

How we Doing here buddie?

Now then, In starting Ur new Topic 2:1 with 50/50, U say-

Simple and effective.  No tracking.

Then in post #2 its changed to-

I have been using the following trigger to bet on the dozen.
I wait until I have all three dozens in the last 3 spins and then I bet for the dozen that hit first of the three to hit again.  I bet 3 times for it to hit.I have been using the following trigger to bet on the dozen.

Is it tracking, or are we not tracking/triggering my friend?

Also, the other day, U published a brilliant post under the heading-
HELP TEST!
U said-

Another idea is that if you post a system under the "Full Systems" heading, you must have played  ?10? sessions and still be well ahead or else you should start it under "Notepad" or something.

Has this 2:1 with 50/50, past that test of Urs George?

Just wondered buddie, if Ur sticking to Ur brill suggestion, so that new ideas can get the testing they deserve.

PS. I'll be testing.


Would U like to join in the discussion we are having about playing 3 DOZENS?
Its here mate.

Love Ur take on the whole subject, that jamesshoffner22162 has started,
In the twin/parallel Topic.

[GLC]

My dearest friend Christopher,

I didn't make it clear, but I changed my method of play for testing in the 2nd reply.  So yes, there is tracking and a trigger in that one.  It's just a suggestion.

If you will note, my post titled Help Test got only 25 reads and no replies.  I assumed that to be an outright rejection of the idea.  Therefore, I follow the bouncing ball.

Unfortunately, my creative juices are flowing faster than my testing juices. :LoL:

by the way, please note my disclaimer at the beginning of the post.  That gives me license to violate every thing I say including the little peccadilloes you pointed out.

I have been so busy with my own systems lately that I haven't really had a chance to look at the 3 dozens system.

I have been reading your comments James' system, but haven't gotten involved yet because I can't play online and no casino near me has even close to the bet spread needed.

Thanks for making me have to explain my inconsistencies to the whole world.  I didn't think anyone paid that much attention to what I write anyway.

Another by the way.  If you want the real deal, check out my system titled 2nd dozen.  I just made a tweak to it that is testing out very well.  I could go so far as to say that you can discard every other system you are looking at and just focus on the 2nd dozen and you'd be way ahead of this simple game of roulette, but I won't.

Cheers my friend,

George

[GLC]

I recommend that this be played with the trigger I mention above and that it be played with a modified D'Alembert bet method.

When we lose twice, we add 1 unit to our bet.
When we win once we reduce our bet by 1 unit.
When we are at a new high we reset to 1 unit.

Cheers,

George