Matrix Turbo !

[Twisteruk]

that's how I been playing.

At first I was waiting for 2 virtual losses before starting the progression as only had a bankroll for 10 stages, but have got a full 12 stage bank now   

Nice one 

[Twisteruk]

Real Cash Game No7 (Increased Stake)

Starting Bank 1002

Profit +50

Highest level was 5

Spins 106

Bank 1052


Total Profit +252

[atlantis]

I was playing all my Progression in one Column, IE having a progression for each column
I've since seen the light of day, and agree with Atlantis.

I play that way now, like this

123
333
333 Triggers
111 loss level 1 and level 2 and level 3
122 Trigger
1     Win level 4

Hi Twister,
I play that way too except in your example I do not get a loss in column 3 on the 4th line because I would have already won on the previous line when the double 3's turned into a triple. I would not play an existing vertical triple to turn into a quad so I would wait for a new number to break in column 3 first before searching for a new qualifier in that column...

So my take on the chart is:

123
333
333 Win level 1 (col3)
111 loss level 1 (col1) and level 2 (col2)
122 Trigger
1     Win level 3 (col1)

Thanks,
A.

[Twisteruk]

Hi Twister,
I play that way too except in your example I do not get a loss in column 3 on the 4th line because I would have already won on the previous line when the double 3's turned into a triple. I would not play an existing vertical triple to turn into a quad so I would wait for a new number to break in column 3 first before searching for a new qualifier in that column...

So my take on the chart is:

123
333
333 Win level 1 (col3)
111 loss level 1 (col1) and level 2 (col2)
122 Trigger
1     Win level 3 (col1)

Thanks,
A.

Urrrrrggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

I can always count on you to point out my errors lol 


I can hardly see lol Ive been lookin at my screen so much !


I will re do it 

[Twisteruk]

This is what I meant !!

Not sure.

I was playing all my Progression in one Column, IE having a progression for each column

I've since seen the light of day, and agree with Atlantis.


I play that way now, like this

121
333
333 Triggers
111 loss level 1 and level 2 and level 3
122 Trigger
1     Win level 4

Sorted, sorry about that   



Are we all on the same page now ?

[atlantis]

I can hardly see LoL I've been looking at my screen so much !

Same here. I've started using the eyedrops again!
Since my "Heaven 7" system idea has come crashing down I'm going to spend more time with the Vertical MATRIX family
Liking your real money results!
A.

[Twisteruk]

Same here. I've started using the eyedrops again!
Since my "Heaven 7" system idea has come crashing down I'm going to spend more time with the Vertical MATRIX family
Liking your real money results!
A.

Yeah I just read ure post over there. I never got time to get there I was so distracted with these others. Sorry it didnt work out for you. But there is plenty to smile about over here !

It works really well on BV NZ RNG

Fast too 


Look forward to reading your test results mate 

[chrisbis]

Yeah....................
........
It works really well on BV NZ RNG

Hi Paul.

Do U have a link for BV NZ please?

[Twisteruk]

Real Cash Game No8

Starting Bank 1052

Profit +42

Highest level was 7

Spins 124

Bank 1094


Total Profit +294

[Twisteruk]

Hi Paul.

Do you have a link for BV NZ please?

Its on the Front Page mate 


link:s://:.betvoyager.com

[Twisteruk]

@BW

When you check out the latest and we finalise the rules I can move this baby to Full Systems if ure ready 

[buffalowizard]

Hi guys, been at work today, but managed to crunch many numbers on random.org

I know it has no zero, but then neither does BV, and I think that is what gives us a winning system here.

I have based these findings on Twisters way of using 3 individual progressions on each column.

In total, 12,276 spins/numbers

What I did here is I stopped after a loss on the 7th, using the progression 1,1,2,3,4,6,9. If lost, then a 26 unit loss, but this was reduced by other columns winning at the same time. Only bigger losses were if 2 or even 3 columns lost. A 3 loss only happened once.

Findings were interesting

+717   

I got 5 runs of 10
3 runs of 11
And only 1 run of 13+ (I didnt find out when it ended as I had come to the end of the number list)

Would be interested to see what you guys think. Even with the one 12+ loss, it would be well over +500 in profit. I was looking at a cheaper more economical way to bet with larger units.

BW

[Twisteruk]

Hi guys, been at work today, but managed to crunch many numbers on random.org

I know it has no zero, but then neither does BV, and I think that is what gives us a winning system here.

I have based these findings on Twisters way of using 3 individual progressions on each column.

In total, 12,276 spins/numbers

What I did here is I stopped after a loss on the 7th, using the progression 1,1,2,3,4,6,9. If lost, then a 26 unit loss, but this was reduced by other columns winning at the same time. Only bigger losses were if 2 or even 3 columns lost. A 3 loss only happened once.

Findings were interesting

+717   

I got 5 runs of 10
3 runs of 11
And only 1 run of 13+ (I didn't find out when it ended as I had come to the end of the number list)

Would be interested to see what you guys think. Even with the one 12+ loss, it would be well over +500 in profit. I was looking at a cheaper more economical way to bet with larger units.

BW

Thats very interesting mate

Would loved to of known where that +13 ended !!!

Looks really good 

I must say I havent been playing that way though 

[buffalowizard]

I know it puts a new spin on everything, which makes it tough for concrete rules.

To be honest in over 12,000 numbers, I only came across a 12+ once (without zero), so maybe carry on playing the original way.

I was testing having each column seperate, do you still play this way Twister?

BW

[buffalowizard]

I suppose the best way to test this (even though I have done quite a few thousand myself) is to code in the two or three variants we have here, and find which one the most profitable.

It's down to how you prefer to play. If you only want to risk a small loss then play the stop at 7 rule. If you dont mind carrying on to more dizzy heights and rake in more winners then play the longer progression run.

To be honest,, either way wins healthily that's for sure. Hope we can get more testers on board

BW