Double Dozens Winner

[buffalowizard]

For those that want a bit of action, such as betting every spin on 2 dozens, then just take a look at this.

Firstly, we bet against the last four results. Dozens are 1,2,3

Here are actuals:

1113 <So, our betting stream would be 2/3, 2/3, 2/3, 1/2

The next spun number was 3, so that's a win.

Now the sequence looks like this: 1133, so the new betting stream is 2/3, 2/3, 1/2, 1/2

Hope that is clear, as the basic betting strategy. It's pretty unoriginal but plain and simple.

The problem is, you can and will run into 4,5 losses in a row, which we all know with 2 dozens, can be a deep hole you struggle to get out of.

Look at this sequence in terms of win/loss:

LWWWWWWWWWWWWLLWWLLLLWWWLLLLLWWWLLLWW

A lovely run of 12 wins on the trot, but followed by a 4 loss, quickly by a 5 loss and then another 3 (the zero being chief culprit) Should be devastating right?

Actually, using my staking plan, this little run ends in +1

Here's a run I just noted down, these are the kinds of runs you can expect.

LWWWLWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWLWWLWWWWWLLWWLWLWWWLLWWWWLLWWW

Note, the 18 wins in a row. This session ended in +22

There are 3 stages of progression 1/2  3/5  8/10 and 20/40

The trick is, you stop after a double loss, thereby cutting out massive losses on losing streaks 4 or more long.

The re-entry point, is another win at the next progression stage, so

WLL <stop at -5.  W <you have lost the first 2 steps of progression, so now bet 3 units  W  < -2  and now back to 1 unit as always after any win.

Look at this horror show:

WLLWLLWWLLLWWLLLLLLWWLLWWWLLLLLL Ends on -15

Not too bad from such a frightener, and one that can easily be made back.

If you re betting for example at 5 in the progression, and you lose, then the next bet will be 8. Only on a win, is it returned to 1 unit. That is important.

Example:  LLWLW  You get the double loss on 1st progression step 1/2, wait for the win, then bet 2nd progression step 3 units, lose, so next would be 5 units, and a win.

Here is another tricky string with a few double losses for you to look at:

WWWWWLWWLLWLWWWLLWWWLWLLLWWWWLWWLWLLWWWWWWLLWWLWW

+1

When a zero hits, I just take the dozen immediately before it, when tracking, so you can still bet every spin.

If you encounter the dreaded LLWLLWLLWLL then go home and cry into your beer

BW

[buffalowizard]

Just played another run:

WWWWWWLWLLLLLWWWWWWWWWWWLWWLWLWWWWLWWWLLLWWLLLWWLWWWWWWWLLWWLWWWLWWWWWWW

+23

[buffalowizard]

LWWLLWLWWWLWLWWLWWWWWWLW
LWWWLLWLLLWWWLWWLLLWWLLWWL
WWWWWWWLWWWWLWWLLWWWWLWWWWWWWWWW   +8

[paul2007]

Hello there!  I play two dozend and collumns most of the time using a pattern breaking system, simimlar to yours.  But my downfall is progression. . .  I have been using . . .



Could you do a quick example of your progression, i have looked and cant get my head around it.  .

Thanks. . .  :)

[buffalowizard]

Hello there!  I play two dozend and collumns most of the time using a pattern breaking system, simimlar to yours.  But my downfall is progression. . .  I have been using . . .



Could you do a quick example of your progression, I have looked and can't get my head around it.  .

Thanks. . . 

Hi Paul, yes there are 4 steps. You only move up to the next step if you encounter two consecutive losses. You dont keep betting after 2. You wait for a new trigger

Cheers
Buffalo

[vundarosa]

"There are 3 stages of progression 1/2  3/5  8/10 and 20/40"

======

care to explain a bit better how the progression works. You say its a 3 stage but you have four pairs in there....

vundarosa

[vundarosa]

Hi Paul, yes there are 4 steps. You only move up to the next step if you encounter two consecutive losses. You don't keep betting after 2. You wait for a new trigger

Cheers
Buffalo

That seems to work very well. Just played for real money 27 cycles, thats 108 spins.
Got 73 Wins and 28 Losses. Most wins in a row 9 and most losses in a row 3. That was an easy section...

vundarosa

[buffalowizard]

Yes i made a mistake, it is a 4 stage progression

Of ocurse you can make it less aggressive if you wish.

Good to here you doing well

BW

[rolf-harris]

Its not how many stages there are, its the progression itself I can't understand.......
I am looking to try this system but can't get my head round the staking.

[GLC]

Its not how many stages there are, its the progression itself I can't understand.......
I am looking to try this system but can't get my head round the staking.

rolf-harris,


Here's the way I understand the progression.  We start playing betting 1-1 on our 2 dozens.  We continue to bet 1-1 until we lose.  On a loss we enter our progression of 1-1/2-2; 3-3/5-5; 8-8/10-10; 20-20/40-40.  That's 8 different bets.


Our first loss represents the 1-1 of our progression so our next bet is 2-2.  If it wins, we immediately drop back to 1-1 and continue betting until another loss.  If our 2-2 bet had also lost, we would have stopped betting until we had a fictitious Win.  That's our trigger to resume betting at the next level of our progression which is 3-3.  If this wins, we drop back to 1-1.  If it loses, we bet 5-5.  If this also loses we again stop betting until a fictitious win and we resume betting at 8-8, etc...


Remember anytime we win, we drop all the way back to 1-1 even though we will be in the hole on a win after losing the 2-2 bet. 

Also, remember that we always stop betting after 2 losses in a row and wait for a Win to trigger resumption of betting.


In my mind the nice thing about a bet like this is that the worse the run of luck, the more we lose, but we don't lose nearly as much as if we were betting the pure martingale progression for a double dozen.  Buffalo is counting on the W's to make up the losses so we always end in the plus.


That's the way I read it my friend.


Cheers,


GLC

[Jointu]

Hi buffalowizard

Still playing this system?

I like it so far.

I do not have time to run some tests but will in the near future.

Thank you.

[buffalowizard]

Hi guys,


This one did well in testing, but time and an insatiable thirst for developing 'new' methods put this in the slipstream.


George is spot on with his staking explanation, and it is of course an area that can always be tweaked and improved. Hope you do well with it.




BW