• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Dealer Signature - Fact and Fiction.

Started by ego, Feb 12, 12:48 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego

Dealer Signature - Fact and Fiction.

Part 1.

Hello i just want to write about it and don't aim to cause trouble - feel is just a thought about 37 degree of freedom.

First we can try to understand one spin and with a raw explinantion capture what happens during a spin.

We have the dealer and he or she pick up the ball and push or touch the rotor to give it speed ( not the exact same speed as previous spin session ).

Then the dealer spin the ball from a different angel or different position then previous spin session and not with the same strength or force when he or she put the ball in motion.

Now the wheel have a new spin development session witch is not the same as the previous spin development session.

The ball will most common hit a different deflector and will from release moment travel with a different length ( shorter or longer turnarounds ) before it smack into the deflector and hit the rotor witch also will have a different position then the previous spin development session.

Finally the ball will start to jump and bounce on the frets on the rotors number ring and find a pocket of 37 degree of freedom and the scatter wont be the same jumps as previous spin development and it will end ( find a pocket to land in ) this will end this spin development session.

Cheers

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

Dealer Signature - Fact and Fiction.

Part 2.

No dealer signature with no present bias.

If one deflector hit more frequent the others deflectors then the ball at the end of the spin will hit it more frequent at the same spot - like a distance from A to B.

In a perfect world with a perfect bias we would have the following.

Issues 1 is that the ball has to make the same amount of turnarounds from the beginning to the very end - meaning the ball has to have the same strength or force.
For example making 18 turnarounds from start to end when it hits dominant deflector.

Issue 2 is that the rotor will not be at same position and we have no clue what numbers will be at this moment.
So the idea is to calibrate and measuring so we know witch number will be below the deflector when ball hits it - also a way to have distance from A to B.

Issue 3 is that we have not clue if the ball will make 17 18 19 turnarounds and that means that the rotor will travel with different movement before it smack into deflector - so if we can measuring the exact amount of turnarounds from start to end and calculate the difference rotor movement does - then we can also predict witch number will be below deflector when ball hits it - in a perfect world we would now have all we want - distance from A to B.

Issue 4 is the ball jumps that can scatter on the number rings in a random matter - but using certain ways to place bets to cover certain degree of pockets with numbers we will win more then we lose as we already know witch spread of numbers the ball will land in with true high probability based upon bias and physics.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

Part 3.

If we assume some one would use old traditional release point from dealer to get yardage or distance from A to B then its position doing so matters.
One common error or false positive during this is that some believe that you can use any position as long it is the same and constant to get a dealers release to achieve correct data and yardage from A to B.

I claim it is a false positive as the wheel is rounded and the vertical deflectors indicate 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 and pass that an hole new extra or less turnaround will be a fact ...
To get a accurate release some one has to observe and determine the dead area which the wheel will indicate depending of what kind of degree of tilt.

If we assume worst case scenario with a semi tilted wheel then the active deflector next to the one that is at sleep/dead will be the position from where you read release number after the dealer launch the ball and to get precise and accurate release you can wait for one full turnaround before you make your read ( as a 2 pin game is realistic and 1 pin game is past history ) ...
For obvious reasons this take effect and involves when two opposite deflectors hit more frequent and witch will give a nice effect with certain rotor speeds.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-