Dozens call the colors

[GLC]

Here's an idea that I had based on Compa's R/B system and a system Atlantis published a couple weeks ago.

This system is based on betting that a trend will continue. 

If the 3rd column hits, since there are more reds than blacks and we're betting the trend will continue, we bet for a R to hit next.

If the 2nd column hits, since there are more blacks than reds and we're betting the trend will continue, we bet for a B to hit next.

If the 1st column hits, since there are an equal amount of reds and blacks, we bet that whatever the last color was will hit again.

In other words, if we just spun a red number that was located in the 1st dozen, then we would be red again.

If the colors are chopping when a number in the 1st column spins, we play for the chop to continue.  This goes for the doublets also.  If the colors have been RRBB and the last black number was in column 1, we bet for R which would continue the doubles.

The bet following a 1st column number is optional.  It might be better to skip betting after the 1st column spins and only bet after a 2nd or 3rd column spins.

If a zero spins, just skip the next bet and pick up again depending on which column spins next.

I've only tested a few hundred spins but it is winning so far.  I was playing to bet after a 1st column spin.  I have been using the 2 up, 2 down betting system.  Start over anytime you are at +1.  I know that a few hundred spins is nothing, but if anyone is interested, give it a try and tell us how you do.

This is just something I thought might make for an interesting bet selection method, so any suggestions are very welcome.  It may become a full system eventually.

Cheers,

George

[GLC]

After looking at this closer, I see that it isn't that much different from some of the suggestions in Compa's R/B system.

I might play around with it a little and see what happens.  Maybe post a few tests if it looks promising.

Drat!  We're going on vacation for a couple of weeks and I won't be able to spend much time testing for a while.  It's so aggrivating when boring and mundane parts of life interfere with the important things like roulette.

G.

[VLS]

It's so aggravating when boring and mundane parts of life interfere with the important things like roulette.

G.

[GLC]

Just kidding Victor.

Hey all,

Just completed another session with this system.  I have decided that it works much better by not betting after a 1st column number.  Here are the statistics on the last session:

339 spins
118 wins
99 losses
122 No Bets
Most losses in a row 6 (2x)
Longest run without 2 wins in a row 13 (for the fibo better)

I decided to not bet after a number from the 1st column because I kind of agree with Moles when he says that betting every spin is suicide.  Another reason is that I would have lost a few more than I won of the 1st column numbers.

Still looking farily promising.

G.

[GLC]

Next session not so good.

106 losses
88 wins
338 spins
7 losses in a row 1x

I suppose it would take a lot of testing to determine if it's any better than just playing Red every spin or Black every spin.

I think you could come out ahead if you used Lanky's 6 point divisor, but it would be a long, hard climb.

The bread winners betting system could pull out eventually if you had a high enough stop loss.

Good night

George